For many years metformin has been the gold standard in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. According to recommendations of the most important diabetes associations, this is the first-choice drug for use as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Metformin is also recommended in combined treatment when monotherapy is no longer effective. It is then combined with a sulfony­lurea, an incretin, flozin, or insulin, irrespective of the number of insulin injections per day. Besides its properties used in the treatment of diabetes, metformin has been treated for some time as a drug of a so-called pleiotropic activity, as each year brings new reports about its favourable effect in different conditions. At present, the scope of reimbursed indications of this drug has been expanded to include prediabetes, insulin resistance syndromes, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Metformin does not stimulate insulin secretion by the beta cells of the pancreas, and thus it is a drug that does not cause hypoglycaemia. The blood glucose-lowering effect of the drug is a consequence of hepatic glucose production inhibition, and of peripheral tissue (muscle tissue, fatty tissue) sensitisation to the effect of insulin of both endogenous and exogenous origin. The exact mechanism of metformin action at the cellular level remained unknown for a long time. Studies performed in recent years have provided a great deal of information that enables better understanding of the mechanism of action of the drug as well as the clinical effects resulting from its use. Metformin, besides improvement of glycaemia, is neutral to body weight, is cardioprotective, improves lipid profile, and has a probable anti-cancer effect. Metformin accumulation in the intestinal mucosa may interfere with FDG (18F-deoxyglucose) PET-CT image assessment. The aim of this article is a detailed discussion of metformin properties, its mechanisms of action, and clinical effects. For many years metformin has been the gold standard in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. According to recommendations of the most important diabetes associations, this is the first-choice drug for use as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Metformin is also recommended in combined treatment when monotherapy is no longer effective. It is then combined with a sulfony­lurea, an incretin, flozin, or insulin, irrespective of the number of insulin injections per day. Besides its properties used in the treatment of diabetes, metformin has been treated for some time as a drug of a so-called pleiotropic activity, as each year brings new reports about its favourable effect in different conditions. At present, the scope of reimbursed indications of this drug has been expanded to include prediabetes, insulin resistance syndromes, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Metformin does not stimulate insulin secretion by the beta cells of the pancreas, and thus it is a drug that does not cause hypoglycaemia. The blood glucose-lowering effect of the drug is a consequence of hepatic glucose production inhibition, and of peripheral tissue (muscle tissue, fatty tissue) sensitisation to the effect of insulin of both endogenous and exogenous origin. The exact mechanism of metformin action at the cellular level remained unknown for a long time. Studies performed in recent years have provided a great deal of information that enables better understanding of the mechanism of action of the drug as well as the clinical effects resulting from its use. Metformin, besides improvement of glycaemia, is neutral to body weight, is cardioprotective, improves lipid profile, and has a probable anti-cancer effect. Metformin accumulation in the intestinal mucosa may interfere with FDG (18F-deoxyglucose) PET-CT image assessment. The aim of this article is a detailed discussion of metformin properties, its mechanisms of action, and clinical effects.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Novel markers of insulin resistance and progression of atherosclerosis include the triglycerides and glucose index (TyG index), the triglycerides and body mass index (Tyg-BMI) and the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR). Establishing independent risk factors for in-hospital death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) remains critical. The aim of the study was to assess the risk of in-hospital death and MACCE within 12 months after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients with and without T2DM based on TyG index, Tyg-BMI and METS-IR. Methods: Retrospective analysis included 1706 patients with STEMI and NSTEMI hospitalized between 2013 and 2021. We analyzed prognostic value of TyG index, Tyg-BMI and METS-IR for in-hospital death and MACCE as its components (death from any cause, MI, stroke, revascularization) within 12 months after STEMI or NSTEMI in patients with and without T2DM. Results: Of 1706 patients, 58 in-hospital deaths were reported (29 patients [4.3%] in the group with T2DM and 29 patients [2.8%] in the group without T2DM; p = 0.1). MACCE occurred in 18.9% of the total study population (25.8% in the group with T2DM and 14.4% in the group without T2DM; p < 0.001). TyG index, Tyg-BMI and METS-IR were significantly higher in the group of patients with T2DM compared to those without T2DM (p < 0.001). Long-term MACCE were more prevalent in patients with T2DM (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the prediction of in-hospital death and the TyG index was 0.69 (p < 0.001). The ROC curve for predicting in-hospital death based on METS-IR was 0.682 (p < 0.001). The AUC-ROC values for MACCE prediction based on the TyG index and METS-IR were 0.582 (p < 0.001) and 0.57 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: TyG index was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death in patients with STEMI or NSTEMI. TyG index, TyG-BMI and METS-IR were not independent risk factors for MACCE at 12 month follow-up. TyG index and METS-IR have low predictive value in predicting MACCE within 12 months after STEMI and NSTEMI.

(1) Background: The aim was to assess whether combined aerobic and resistance training performed under hypoxic and normoxic conditions had an impact on diabetes control, VO₂max (maximum oxygen consumption), and echocardiological and anthropometric parameters in men with long-term type 1 diabetes. (2) Methods: Sixteen male participants (mean age: 37 years, mean HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin): 7.0%) were randomly assigned to two groups: training in normoxic conditions or training in conditions of altitude hypoxia. All subjects participated in 60 min combined aerobic and resistance training sessions twice a week for 6 weeks. At baseline and in the 6th week, echocardiography, incremental exercise test, and anthropometric and diabetes control parameters were assessed. (3) Results: After 6 weeks, there was no significant change in HbA1c value in any group. We noted a more stable glycemia profile during training in the hypoxia group (p > 0.05). Patients in the hypoxia group required less carbohydrates during training than in the normoxia group. A comparable increase in VO₂max was observed in both groups (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in cardiological and anthropometric parameters. (4) Conclusions: Combined aerobic and resistance training improved VO₂max after 6 weeks regardless of the conditions of the experiments. This exercise is safe in terms of glycemic control in patients with well-controlled diabetes.

Atherogenic indices: Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio, Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), Atherogenic Coefficient (AC), Castelli's Risk Index I and II (CRI-I, CRI-II) are used in clinical studies as surrogates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Risk prediction of MACCE in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has vital role in clinical practice. We aimed to assess prognostic value of these indices following AMI. We analyzed patients with AMI with and without T2DM and the prognostic values of atherogenic indices for in-hospital death and MACCE within 12 months after AMI. Of 2461 patients, 152 in-hospital deaths (6.2 %) were reported (74 patients [7.4 %] with T2DM and 78 [5.3 %] without T2DM; p = 0.042). MACCE occurred in 22.7 % of patients (29.7 % with T2DM and 17.9 % without T2DM; p < 0.001). TG/HDL-C and AIP were higher in T2DM patients compared to those without T2DM (p < 0.001). Long-term MACCE was more prevalent in patients with T2DM (p < 0.001). The AUC-ROC for predicting in-hospital death based on TG/HDL-C and AIP was 0.57 (p = 0.002). None of the atherogenic indices was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death or MACCE at 12-month follow-up in patients with AMI. AIP was an independent risk factor for death at 12-month follow-up.

Introduction. Self monitoring of blood glucose is one of basic elements of effective diabetes treatment. Due to proper self monitoring of blood glucose adequate modification of diabetes treatment — fulfilling criteria of good glycemic control — is possible. Effective treatment enables prevention of late diabetic complications — a cause of disability or death in diabetic population. Material and methods. 765 type 2 diabetic patients (above 18 yrs) treated with both oral hypoglycaemic drugs or insulin in different schemes were observed (mean age: 64.5 ± 10.9 yrs). Therapy was in line with general standards of treatment, medication choice was based on indications and previous independent physician decision. Patients were given glucometer ContourPlus and were taught how to use it and how often measurement had to be taken (on the basis of Polish Diabetes Association Recommendation for 2016). After 3 months (± 2 weeks) assessment of compliance to self monitoring of blood glucose was performed. Additionally, level of implementation of Polish Diabetes Association Recommendation for general practitioners, functionality of glucometer and usefulness of “second chance” measurement were evaluated. Results. 440 participants completely fulfilled recommendations (65.1%) of general practitioner (investigator) regarding self monitoring documentation (type of documentation provided: glucometer, glucose monitoring diary). In investigators opinion, 315 patients (below 50%) were conscientiously compliant to self monitoring of blood glucose based on Polish Diabetes Association Recommendations. In general practice for about 68.0% of patients (n = 506) Polish Diabetes Association Recommendations for self blood glucose monitoring were implemented. Based on investigators opinion the most important features of glucometers which determine effectiveness of self monitoring of glucose are: simplicity, high capacity memory, accuracy and precision of measurement, evaluation of mean glucose in general and mean pre-/after meal. 67.7% patients (n = 451) regarded possibility of “second chance” measurement in glucometer ContourPlus as useful in daily self monitoring of blood glucose. Conclusions. Discrepancy between Polish Diabetes Association Recommendations of self blood glucose monitoring and its realization by type 2 diabetic patients, carried out by general practitioners, was observed. Effective glucose monitoring is dependent on tight cooperation between doctor and patient. Introduction. Self monitoring of blood glucose is one of basic elements of effective diabetes treatment. Due to proper self monitoring of blood glucose adequate modification of diabetes treatment — fulfilling criteria of good glycemic control — is possible. Effective treatment enables prevention of late diabetic complications — a cause of disability or death in diabetic population. Material and methods. 765 type 2 diabetic patients (above 18 yrs) treated with both oral hypoglycaemic drugs or insulin in different schemes were observed (mean age: 64.5 ± 10.9 yrs). Therapy was in line with general standards of treatment, medication choice was based on indications and previous independent physician decision. Patients were given glucometer ContourPlus and were taught how to use it and how often measurement had to be taken (on the basis of Polish Diabetes Association Recommendation for 2016). After 3 months (± 2 weeks) assessment of compliance to self monitoring of blood glucose was performed. Additionally, level of implementation of Polish Diabetes Association Recommendation for general practitioners, functionality of glucometer and usefulness of “second chance” measurement were evaluated. Results. 440 participants completely fulfilled recommendations (65.1%) of general practitioner (investigator) regarding self monitoring documentation (type of documentation provided: glucometer, glucose monitoring diary). In investigators opinion, 315 patients (below 50%) were conscientiously compliant to self monitoring of blood glucose based on Polish Diabetes Association Recommendations. In general practice for about 68.0% of patients (n = 506) Polish Diabetes Association Recommendations for self blood glucose monitoring were implemented. Based on investigators opinion the most important features of glucometers which determine effectiveness of self monitoring of glucose are: simplicity, high capacity memory, accuracy and precision of measurement, evaluation of mean glucose in general and mean pre-/after meal. 67.7% patients (n = 451) regarded possibility of “second chance” measurement in glucometer ContourPlus as useful in daily self monitoring of blood glucose. Conclusions. Discrepancy between Polish Diabetes Association Recommendations of self blood glucose monitoring and its realization by type 2 diabetic patients, carried out by general practitioners, was observed. Effective glucose monitoring is dependent on tight cooperation between doctor and patient.