Marco Giardino

Dr. Marco Giardino

Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDPhilip Deline
Philip Deline
SGStephan Gruber
Stephan Gruber
RDReynald Delaloye
Reynald Delaloye
LFLuzia Fischer
Luzia Fischer
MGMarten Geertsema
Marten Geertsema
PSPhilippe Schoeneich
Philippe Schoeneich

1 March 2018 in Global and Planetary Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNicola Colombo
Nicola Colombo
FSFranco Salerno
Franco Salerno
SGStephan Gruber
Stephan Gruber
MFMichele Freppaz
Michele Freppaz
MWMark Williams
Mark Williams
Marco GiardinoMarco Giardino
Marco Giardino

1 January 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
ZZZbigniew Zwoliński
Zbigniew Zwoliński
ANAlicja Najwer
Alicja Najwer
Marco GiardinoMarco Giardino
Marco Giardino

1 October 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNicola Colombo
Nicola Colombo
FSFranco Salerno
Franco Salerno
MMM. Martin
M. Martin
MMM. Malandrino
M. Malandrino
Marco GiardinoMarco Giardino
Marco Giardino
MFM. Freppaz
M. Freppaz

29 May 2020 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLuigi Perotti
Luigi Perotti
IBIrene Bollati
Irene Bollati
CVCRISTINA VIANI
CRISTINA VIANI
EZEnrico Zanoletti
Enrico Zanoletti
VCValeria Caironi
Valeria Caironi
Marco GiardinoMarco Giardino
Marco Giardino
In the 20th anniversary year of the European Geopark Network, and 5 years on from the receipt of the UNESCO label for the geoparks, this research focuses on geotourism contents and solutions within one of the most recently designated geoparks, admitted for membership in 2013: the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (Western Italian Alps). The main aim of this paper is to corroborate the use of fieldtrips and virtual tours as resources for geotourism. The analysis is developed according to: i) geodiversity and geoheritage of the geopark territory; ii) different approaches for planning fieldtrip and virtual tours. The lists of 18 geotrails, 68 geosites and 13 off-site geoheritage elements (e.g., museums, geolabs) are provided. Then, seven trails were selected as a mirror of the geodiversity and as container of on-site and off-site geoheritage within the geopark. They were described to highlight the different approaches that were implemented for their valorization. Most of the geotrails are equipped with panels, and supported by the presence of thematic laboratories or sections in museums. A multidisciplinary approach (e.g., history, ecology) is applied to some geotrails, and a few of them are translated into virtual tours. The variety of geosciences contents of the geopark territory is hence viewed as richness, in term of high geodiversity, but also in term of diversification for its valorization.

19 October 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paola CoratzaPaola Coratza
Paola Coratza
IBIrene Bollati
Irene Bollati
VPValeria Panizza
Valeria Panizza
BPBrandolini Pierluigi
Brandolini Pierluigi
DCDoriano Castaldini
Doriano Castaldini
MPManuela Pelfini
Manuela Pelfini
In the framework of geosite management, specific targeted symbols for geomorphological legends are still lacking. Concerning geosites of geomorphological interest, geomorphological mapping requires targeted symbols in relation to goals and applications, either concerning geomorphic hazards and risk detection or the enhancement of resources, in particular those related to cultural heritage and, hence, geoheritage. A new methodology for mapping geo(morpho)heritage on geomorphological maps is presented in this paper. Nine iconic examples from the Italian landscape, selected in different morphogenetic and morphoclimatic contexts, are proposed to test the methodology in relation to point, polyline and polygon features. Moreover, guidelines for mapping are suggested according to the importance of the site and to the complexity of processes characterizing each case study.