Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai

Dr. Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai

Computer Science and Engineering, University of Westminster, London, City of London, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 July 2023 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Malarvizhi Kaniappan ChinnathaiMalarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Bugra AlkanBugra Alkan
Bugra Alkan

1 January 2017 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Malarvizhi Kaniappan ChinnathaiMalarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Bugra AlkanBugra Alkan
Bugra Alkan
RHRobert Harrison
Robert Harrison

1 January 2019 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFadi Assad
Fadi Assad
Bugra AlkanBugra Alkan
Bugra Alkan
Malarvizhi Kaniappan ChinnathaiMalarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
MAM.H. Ahmad
M.H. Ahmad
ERE.J. Rushforth
E.J. Rushforth
RHR. Harrison
R. Harrison

1 April 2021 in Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Malarvizhi Kaniappan ChinnathaiMalarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Bugra AlkanBugra Alkan
Bugra Alkan
RHRobert Harrison
Robert Harrison

1 January 2018 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Malarvizhi Kaniappan ChinnathaiMalarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Bugra AlkanBugra Alkan
Bugra Alkan
DVDaniel Vera
Daniel Vera
RHRobert Harrison
Robert Harrison

8 December 2021 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bugra AlkanBugra Alkan
Bugra Alkan
Malarvizhi Kaniappan ChinnathaiMalarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
The optimisation of complex engineering design problems is highly challenging due to the consideration of various design variables. To obtain acceptable near-optimal solutions within reasonable computation time, metaheuristics can be employed for such problems. However, a plethora of novel metaheuristic algorithms are developed and constantly improved and hence it is important to evaluate the applicability of the novel optimisation strategies and compare their performance using real-world engineering design problems. Therefore, in this paper, eight recent population-based metaheuristic optimisation algorithms—African Vultures Optimisation Algorithm (AVOA), Crystal Structure Algorithm (CryStAl), Human-Behaviour Based Optimisation (HBBO), Gradient-Based Optimiser (GBO), Gorilla Troops Optimiser (GTO), Runge–Kutta optimiser (RUN), Social Network Search (SNS) and Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA)—are applied to five different mechanical component design problems and their performance on such problems are compared. The results show that the SNS algorithm is consistent, robust and provides better quality solutions at a relatively fast computation time for the considered design problems. GTO and GBO also show comparable performance across the considered problems and AVOA is the most efficient in terms of computation time.