The microbial community of the human gut has a crucial role in sustaining host homeostasis. High-throughput DNA sequencing has delineated the structural and functional configurations of gut metagenomes in world populations. The microbiota of the Russian population is of particular interest to researchers, because Russia encompasses a uniquely wide range of environmental conditions and ethnogeographical cohorts. Here we conduct a shotgun metagenomic analysis of gut microbiota samples from 96 healthy Russian adult subjects, which reveals novel microbial community structures. The communities from several rural regions display similarities within each region and are dominated by the bacterial taxa associated with the healthy gut. Functional analysis shows that the metabolic pathways exhibiting differential abundance in the novel types are primarily associated with the trade-off between the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla. The specific signatures of the Russian gut microbiota are likely linked to the host diet, cultural habits and socioeconomic status.

Aim. These recommendations are developed for practitioners in order to familiarize them with modern diagnostic methods, management features and pharmacotherapy of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).General provisions. GERD is the most common reason for patients to visit clinics. There are esophageal and extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Patients' complaints of heartburn and regurgitation remain the most sensitive and specific clinical manifestations of GERD. The diagnosis of GERD is established on the basis of anamnestic data, instrumental examination (detection of reflux esophagitis during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, detection of pathological gastroesophageal reflux with 24-hour pH-metry or/and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring). Patients with suspected GERD and the absence of erosive and ulcerative changes in the mucous membrane of the esophagus or the presence of erosive esophagitis of Grade A according to Los Angeles Classification of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease are recommended to conduct 24-hour pH-metry on PPI off to exclude or confirm the diagnosis of GERD. Patients with extraesophageal manifestations of GERD without classic symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) are recommended to undergo 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring with discontinuation of proton pump inhibitor therapy. When deciding on surgical treatment, all patients need to perform high-resolution esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring. Complications of GERD include bleeding, strictures, Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The main groups of medications used in the treatment of GERD are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), alginates, antacids, and prokinetics. PPIs are the drugs of choice in the treatment of both symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and existing erosive esophagitis. Combination therapy Rebamipide with PPIs increases the effectiveness of relief of GERD symptoms, as well as reduces the frequency of relapses.Conclusion. These clinical recommendations will improve the quality of medical care for patients with GERD.

This article summarizes and systematizes the available data from the literature on chronic autoimmune gastritis (CAG) in order to increase the awareness of specialists about the modern possibilities for diagnosing the disease, including its early stages. The clinical manifestation of the disease includes possible variants such as gastrointestinal, hematological (first of all, the formation of iron deficiency and B12-deficiency anemia), and neurological variants. Patients with chronic autoimmune gastritis are characterized by comorbidity with other autoimmune diseases. In this paper, data on the most informative serological markers for the diagnosis of CAG, as well as laboratory tests to detect micronutrient deficiencies, information on the characteristic changes in the gastric mucosa, and the prognosis of the disease, are presented. The diagnosis of CAG should be based on a multidisciplinary approach that combines a thorough analysis of a patient’s complaints with a mandatory assessment of nutritional status, as well as the results of serological, endoscopic, and histological research methods.

1Moscow Clinical Research-and-Practical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow; 2A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 3Children’s Health Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 4I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg; 5M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow; 6Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 7Novosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Novosibirsk; 8Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital, Moscow; 9Department of Pediatrics, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 10I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg; 11Acad. Yu.E. Veltishchev Research Clinical Institute of Pediatrics, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 12Clinic Four, Department of Pediatrics, I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg; 13Childhood Diseases Department Two, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 14Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 15Department of Endoscopic Surgery, City Clinical Hospital Thirty-One, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow; 16A.N. Ryzhikh State Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 17Department of Intermediate-Level Therapy, Tver State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Tver; 18Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Diagnostic Center of Medical Genetics, Saint Petersburg; 19HLA Typing Laboratory, Blood Transfusion Station, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow; 20S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow; 21Department of Nervous System Diseases, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 22Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 23Acad. V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow; 24Department of Therapy, Kazan State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Kazan; 25Department of Intermediate-Level Therapy with Course of Occupational Diseases, Faculty of General Medicine, Omsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Omsk; 26Dmitry Rogachev Federal Research Clinical Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow The paper presents the All-Russian consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children and adults, which has been elaborated by leading experts, such as gastroenterologists and pediatricians of Russia on the basis of the existing Russian and international guidelines. The consensus approved at the 42nd Annual Scientific Session of the Central Research Institute of Gastroenterology on Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine into Clinical Practice (March 2—3, 2016). The consensus is intended for practitioners engaged in the management and treatment of patients with celiac disease. Evidence for the main provisions of the consensus was sought in electronic databases. In making recommendations, the main source was the publications included in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed. The search depth was 10 years. Recommendations in the preliminary version were reviewed by independent experts. Voting was done by the Delphic polling system.

Drugs are widely used to treat different diseases in modern medicine, but they are often associated with adverse events. Those located in the gastrointestinal tract are common and often mild, but they can be serious or life-threatening and determine the continuation of treatment. The stomach is often affected not only by drugs taken orally but also by those administered parenterally. Here, we review the mechanisms of damage, risk factors and specific endoscopic, histopathological and clinical features of those drugs more often involved in gastric damage, namely NSAIDs, aspirin, anticoagulants, glucocorticosteroids, anticancer drugs, oral iron preparations and proton pump inhibitors. NSAID- and aspirin-associated forms of gastric damage are widely studied and have specific features, although they are often hidden by the coexistence of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the damaging effect of anticoagulants and corticosteroids or oral iron therapy on the gastric mucosa is controversial. At the same time, the increased use of new antineoplastic drugs, such as checkpoint inhibitors, has opened up a new area of gastrointestinal damage that will be seen more frequently in the near future. We conclude that there is a need to expand and understand drug-induced gastrointestinal damage to prevent and recognize drug-associated gastropathy in a timely manner.