Neurofeedback training is a technique which has seen a widespread use in clinical applications, but has only given its first steps in the sport environment. Therefore, there is still little information about the effects that this technique might have on parameters, which are relevant for athletes’ health and performance, such as heart rate variability, which has been linked to physiological recovery. In the sport domain, no studies have tried to understand the effects of neurofeedback training on heart rate variability, even though some studies have compared the effects of doing neurofeedback or heart rate biofeedback training on performance. The main goal of the present study was to understand if alpha-band neurofeedback training could lead to increases in heart rate variability. 30 male student-athletes, divided into two groups, (21.2 ± 2.62 year 2/week protocol and 22.6 ± 1.1 year 3/week protocol) participated in the study, of which three subjects were excluded. Both groups performed a pre-test, a trial session and 12 neurofeedback sessions, which consisted of 25 trials of 60 s of a neurofeedback task, with 5 s rest in-between trials. The total neurofeedback session time for each subject was 300 min in both groups. Throughout the experiment, electroencephalography and heart rate variability signals were recorded. Only the three sessions/week group revealed significant improvements in mean heart rate variability at the end of the 12 neurofeedback sessions (p = 0.05); however, significant interaction was not found when compared with both groups. It is possible to conclude that neurofeedback training of individual alpha band may induce changes in heart rate variability in physically active athletes.

Neurofeedback training has shown benefits in clinical treatment and behavioral performance enhancement. Despite the wide range of applications, no consensus has been reached about the optimal training schedule. In this work, an EEG neurofeedback practical experiment was conducted aimed at investigating the effects of training intensity on the enhancement of the amplitude in the individual upper alpha band. We designed INTENSIVE and SPARSE training modalities, which differed regarding three essential aspects of training intensity: the number of sessions, the duration of a session, and the interval between sessions. Nine participants in the INTENSIVE group completed 4 sessions with 37.5 minutes each during consecutive days, while nine participants in the SPARSE group performed 6 sessions of 25 minutes spread over approximately 3 weeks. As a result, regarding the short-term effects, the upper alpha band amplitude change within sessions did not significantly differ between the two groups. Nonetheless, only the INTENSIVE group showed a significant increase in the upper alpha band amplitude. However, for the sustained effects across sessions, none of the groups showed significant changes in the upper alpha band amplitude across the whole course of training. The findings suggest that the progression within session is favored by the intensive design. Therefore, based on these findings, it is proposed that training intensity influences EEG self-regulation within sessions. Further investigations are needed to isolate different aspects of training intensity and effectively confirm if one modality globally outperforms the other.

The practice of combining neuroimaging data with concurrent physiological data is crucial for interpreting neuroimaging results, yet it is often overlooked. The barriers to collecting and using physiological data often stem from the cost and complexity of the extra equipment needed and, more importantly, from the lack of expertise and knowledge required to collect, assess, analyze, and integrate such data. Consequently, the use of physiological data is still uncommon outside of a few specialized groups or centers. To improve the uptake of concurrent physiological and neuroimaging data collection practice, as well as the quality and consistency of physiological recordings collected within neuroimaging settings, the Physiopy community is compiling and maintaining a live, open-access, collaborative set of community practices describing physiological data acquisition, its processing, and its usage in neuroimaging. We present here the methods used to compile this resource, as well as its aims and its future development.

Moderate to severe head pain is a hallmark of recurring migraine attacks. However, it is challenging to study patients during spontaneous attacks and most research on the brain mechanisms of pain in migraine patients has been limited to the processing of painful stimuli between attacks. Here, we hypothesize that the experience of a migraine attack extends beyond the response to painful stimuli and is associated with specific impairments of the salience network (SN), which integrates sensory, emotional and cognitive information in relation to salient stimuli. To test this hypothesis, we analysed the SN dynamics of a group of patients with episodic migraine in three distinct conditions: at rest during a spontaneous migraine attack (ictal phase); while performing an imagery task aiming to elicit the experience of a previous attack, during the interictal phase; and at rest, during the interictal phase. For comparison, we also studied a group of healthy controls in three matching conditions, including rest as well as an imagery task of a (non-migraine) head pain experience. We collected functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and used a dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) analysis to examine the temporal features of the SN from a total of 78 samples. Compared to healthy controls, the SN had a significantly shorter lifetime in patients during the pain imagery task, but not during a migraine attack or interictal resting state. Our results support the disruption of the SN in migraine, and indicate that pain imagery may be a useful paradigm for isolating the emotional and cognitive aspects of pain and investigating SN dynamics.