Nicholas Chileshe

Prof. Nicholas Chileshe

School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2018 in Automation in Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
M. Reza HosseiniM. Reza Hosseini
M. Reza Hosseini
IMIgor Martek
Igor Martek
Edmundas Kazimieras ZavadskasEdmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
AAAjibade A. Aibinu
Ajibade A. Aibinu
Mehrdad ArashpourMehrdad Arashpour
Mehrdad Arashpour
Nicholas ChilesheNicholas Chileshe
Nicholas Chileshe

1 April 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jian ZuoJian Zuo
Jian Zuo
SPStephen Pullen
Stephen Pullen
JPJasmine Palmer
Jasmine Palmer
HBHelen Bennetts
Helen Bennetts
Nicholas ChilesheNicholas Chileshe
Nicholas Chileshe
TMTony Ma
Tony Ma

1 January 2022 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OOOludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju
Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju
AKAhmed Farouk Kineber
Ahmed Farouk Kineber
Nicholas ChilesheNicholas Chileshe
Nicholas Chileshe
David John EdwardsDavid John Edwards
David John Edwards

8 September 2016 in Construction Economics and Building
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
M. Reza HosseiniM. Reza Hosseini
M. Reza Hosseini
Saeed BanihashemiSaeed Banihashemi
Saeed Banihashemi
Nicholas ChilesheNicholas Chileshe
Nicholas Chileshe
MNMehran Oraee Namzadi
Mehran Oraee Namzadi
CUChika Udaeja
Chika Udaeja
TMTammy McCuen
Tammy McCuen
Despite the envisaged benefits of BIM adoption for SMEs, BIM in SMEs has remained an underrepresented area within the available academic literature. This study proposes and draws upon a framework grounded on innovation diffusion theory (IDT) to provide an illuminating insight into the current state of BIM and the main barriers to BIM adoption within Australian SMEs. Based on analyses of 135 questionnaires completed by SMEs through partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) and grounded on the proposed framework, the current state of BIM adoption and barriers to BIM adoption for SMEs are discussed. The findings show that currently around 42% of Australian SMEs use BIM in Level 1 and Level 2 with only around 5% have tried Level 3. It comes to light that lack of knowledge within SMEs and across the construction supply chain is not a major barrier for Australian SMEs. In essence, the main barriers stem from the risks associated with an uncertain return on investment (ROI) for BIM as perceived by key players in SMEs. The findings also show the validity of the framework proposed for explaining BIM adoption in Australian SMEs.

8 May 2020 in Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OOOludolapo Olanrewaju
Oludolapo Olanrewaju
Nicholas ChilesheNicholas Chileshe
Nicholas Chileshe
SBSunday Ajiboye Babarinde
Sunday Ajiboye Babarinde
MSMalindu Sandanayake
Malindu Sandanayake
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and assess the perceptions of constructional professionals on barriers to implementation of building information modeling (BIM) within the Nigerian construction industry.Design/methodology/approach: A scoping literature review was conducted to identify the fourteen barriers to implementation of BIM, which were employed to design a questionnaire survey. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, mean score, Kruskal–Wallis test, analysis of variance and multivariate techniques such as factor analysis.Findings: The descriptive and empirical analysis demonstrated a disparity of ranking of the 14 barriers factors among the groups; however no statistically significant differences among the 14 barriers to BIM. Based on the mean score ranking results, only three (out of 14) barriers are identified as critical (mean score greater than 3.5): few studies available on BIM and lack of knowledge, inexistence or inadequate government policies, and high cost of implementation. The results of the one-sample t-tests show that they were statistically significant differences in 10 out of 14 barriers as follows: few studies available on BIM and lack of knowledge, lack of demand for use and acceptance of BIM, inadequate contractual coordination, lack of specified standards, cost of data and information sharing, technological availability issues, reluctance of other stakeholders, business and cultural changes, data and intellectual property issues, and interoperability issues. The study, through factor analysis, categorized the fourteen barriers to BIM implementation into four principal factors. The factors are: technology and business-related barriers; training and people-related barriers; cost and standards-related barriers; and process and economic-related barriers.Practical implications: The identification and assessment of the key barriers to BIM implementation would be useful for the construction professionals and other stakeholder of the construction industry with the view to advance BIM adoption in Nigeria. This could also be extended to other developing countries through considerations of the local economic conditions, given the status of BIM as being in the germinating stage of development in Africa.Originality/value: The study provides insights on the barriers to BIM implementation across the Nigerian construction sector environments. The innovative aspect of the study is the identification of the ordered and grouped (composite) set of barriers to BIM which could be used to developing appropriate mitigating solutions.

27 May 2015 in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
M. Reza HosseiniM. Reza Hosseini
M. Reza Hosseini
RRRaufdeen Rameezdeen
Raufdeen Rameezdeen
Nicholas ChilesheNicholas Chileshe
Nicholas Chileshe
SLSteffen Lehmann
Steffen Lehmann
Reverse logistics in construction refers to the movement of products and materials from salvaged buildings to a new construction site. While there is a plethora of studies looking at various aspects of the reverse logistics chain, there is no systematic review of literature on this important subject as applied to the construction industry. Therefore, the objective of this study is to integrate the fragmented body of knowledge on reverse logistics in construction, with the aim of promoting the concept among industry stakeholders and the wider construction community. Through a qualitative meta-analysis, the study synthesises the findings of previous studies and presents some actions needed by industry stakeholders to promote this concept within the real-life context. First, the trend of research and terminology related with reverse logistics is introduced. Second, it unearths the main advantages and barriers of reverse logistics in construction while providing some suggestions to harness the advantages and mitigate these barriers. Finally, it provides a future research direction based on the review.