Mikael Engmark

Dr. Mikael Engmark

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 November 2016 in Current Pharmaceutical Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andreas LaustsenAndreas Laustsen
Andreas Laustsen
MEMikael Engmark
Mikael Engmark
CMChristina Milbo
Christina Milbo
JJJónas Johannesen
Jónas Johannesen
BLBruno Lomonte
Bruno Lomonte
BLBrian Lohse
Brian Lohse
The snake is the symbol of medicine due to its association with Asclepius, the Greek God of medicine, and so with good reasons. More than 725 species of venomous snakes have toxins specifically evolved to exert potent bioactivity in prey or victims, and snakebites constitute a public health hazard of high impact in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and parts of Oceania. Parenteral administration of antivenoms is the mainstay in snakebite envenoming therapy. However, despite well-demonstrated efficacy and safety of many antivenoms worldwide, they are still being produced by traditional animal immunization procedures, and therefore present a number of drawbacks. Technological advances within biopharmaceutical development and medicinal chemistry could pave the way for rational drug design approaches against snake toxins. This could minimize the use of animals and bring forward more effective therapies for snakebite envenomings. In this review, current stateof- the-art in biopharmaceutical antitoxin development is presented together with an overview of available bioinformatics and structural data on snake venom toxins. This growing body of scientific and technological tools could define the basis for introducing a rational drug design approach into the field of snakebite envenoming therapy.

1 February 2018 in Journal of Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SAStuart Ainsworth
Stuart Ainsworth
DPDaniel Petras
Daniel Petras
MEMikael Engmark
Mikael Engmark
Roderich SüssmuthRoderich Süssmuth
Roderich Süssmuth
GWGareth Whiteley
Gareth Whiteley
JCJuan Calvete
Juan Calvete

3 February 2017 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andreas LaustsenAndreas Laustsen
Andreas Laustsen
KJKristoffer H. Johansen
Kristoffer H. Johansen
MEMikael Engmark
Mikael Engmark
MAMikael Rørdam Andersen
Mikael Rørdam Andersen
Snakebite envenoming is a major public health burden in tropical parts of the developing world. In sub-Saharan Africa, neglect has led to a scarcity of antivenoms threatening the lives and limbs of snakebite victims. Technological advances within antivenom are warranted, but should be evaluated not only on their possible therapeutic impact, but also on their cost-competitiveness. Recombinant antivenoms based on oligoclonal mixtures of human IgG antibodies produced by CHO cell cultivation may be the key to obtaining better snakebite envenoming therapies. Based on industry data, the cost of treatment for a snakebite envenoming with a recombinant antivenom is estimated to be in the range USD 60–250 for the Final Drug Product. One of the effective antivenoms (SAIMR Snake Polyvalent Antivenom from the South African Vaccine Producers) currently on the market has been reported to have a wholesale price of USD 640 per treatment for an average snakebite. Recombinant antivenoms may therefore in the future be a cost-competitive alternative to existing serum-based antivenoms. Given the medical importance of snakebite envenoming and the current shortage of antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa, technological advances in antivenom development and production are needed. One of the avenues that could be taken involves the use of recombinant antivenoms based on oligoclonal mixtures of human IgG antibodies, since these may have the benefits of being compatible with the human immune system and their production is independent on animal immune systems and venom procurement. However, an important aspect of introducing recombinant antivenoms to the clinic is their cost of production given that snakebite victims are often poor rural workers living in remote parts of the tropical parts of the developing world. Here, we aim to provide cost estimates of recombinant antivenom manufacture with special focus on snakebite envenoming in sub-Saharan Africa. Our results indicate that recombinant antivenoms in the future will indeed be cost-competitive compared to existing animal-derived serum-based antivenoms. Furthermore, we outline different manufacturing strategies and suggest the use of caprylic acid precipitation as a low cost purification method following cultivation of CHO cells for antibody expression due to its use in current antivenom manufacture.


23 July 2016 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andreas LaustsenAndreas Laustsen
Andreas Laustsen
MSMireia Solà
Mireia Solà
EJEmma Christine Jappe
Emma Christine Jappe
SOSaioa Oscoz
Saioa Oscoz
LLLine Præst Lauridsen
Line Præst Lauridsen
MEMikael Engmark
Mikael Engmark
Spiders and scorpions are notorious for their fearful dispositions and their ability to inject venom into prey and predators, causing symptoms such as necrosis, paralysis, and excruciating pain. Information on venom composition and the toxins present in these species is growing due to an interest in using bioactive toxins from spiders and scorpions for drug discovery purposes and for solving crystal structures of membrane-embedded receptors. Additionally, the identification and isolation of a myriad of spider and scorpion toxins has allowed research within next generation antivenoms to progress at an increasingly faster pace. In this review, the current knowledge of spider and scorpion venoms is presented, followed by a discussion of all published biotechnological efforts within development of spider and scorpion antitoxins based on small molecules, antibodies and fragments thereof, and next generation immunization strategies. The increasing number of discovery and development efforts within this field may point towards an upcoming transition from serum-based antivenoms towards therapeutic solutions based on modern biotechnology.

27 September 2018 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLine Ledsgaard
Line Ledsgaard
Timothy P. JenkinsTimothy P. Jenkins
Timothy P. Jenkins
KDKristian Davidsen
Kristian Davidsen
KKKamille Elvstrøm Krause
Kamille Elvstrøm Krause
AMAndrea Martos-Esteban
Andrea Martos-Esteban
Andreas LaustsenAndreas Laustsen
Andreas Laustsen
Antivenom cross-reactivity has been investigated for decades to determine which antivenoms can be used to treat snakebite envenomings from different snake species. Traditionally, the methods used for analyzing cross-reactivity have been immunodiffusion, immunoblotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), enzymatic assays, and in vivo neutralization studies. In recent years, new methods for determination of cross-reactivity have emerged, including surface plasmon resonance, antivenomics, and high-density peptide microarray technology. Antivenomics involves a top-down assessment of the toxin-binding capacities of antivenoms, whereas high-density peptide microarray technology may be harnessed to provide in-depth knowledge on which toxin epitopes are recognized by antivenoms. This review provides an overview of both the classical and new methods used to investigate antivenom cross-reactivity, the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and examples of studies using the methods. A special focus is given to antivenomics and high-density peptide microarray technology as these high-throughput methods have recently been introduced in this field and may enable more detailed assessments of antivenom cross-reactivity.