Adam Dubowski

Adam Dubowski


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 December 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMeike Nauta
Meike Nauta
RWRicky Walsh
Ricky Walsh
ADAdam Dubowski
Adam Dubowski
CSChristin Seifert
Christin Seifert
Machine learning models have been successfully applied for analysis of skin images. However, due to the black box nature of such deep learning models, it is difficult to understand their underlying reasoning. This prevents a human from validating whether the model is right for the right reasons. Spurious correlations and other biases in data can cause a model to base its predictions on such artefacts rather than on the true relevant information. These learned shortcuts can in turn cause incorrect performance estimates and can result in unexpected outcomes when the model is applied in clinical practice. This study presents a method to detect and quantify this shortcut learning in trained classifiers for skin cancer diagnosis, since it is known that dermoscopy images can contain artefacts. Specifically, we train a standard VGG16-based skin cancer classifier on the public ISIC dataset, for which colour calibration charts (elliptical, coloured patches) occur only in benign images and not in malignant ones. Our methodology artificially inserts those patches and uses inpainting to automatically remove patches from images to assess the changes in predictions. We find that our standard classifier partly bases its predictions of benign images on the presence of such a coloured patch. More importantly, by artificially inserting coloured patches into malignant images, we show that shortcut learning results in a significant increase in misdiagnoses, making the classifier unreliable when used in clinical practice. With our results, we, therefore, want to increase awareness of the risks of using black box machine learning models trained on potentially biased datasets. Finally, we present a model-agnostic method to neutralise shortcut learning by removing the bias in the training dataset by exchanging coloured patches with benign skin tissue using image inpainting and re-training the classifier on this de-biased dataset.

12 October 2020 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
ADAdam Dubowski
Adam Dubowski
While the concept of a Sparse Neural Network has been researched for some time, researchers have only recently made notable progress in the matter. Techniques like Sparse Evolutionary Training allow for significantly lower computational complexity when compared to fully connected models by reducing redundant connections. That typically takes place in an iterative process of weight creation and removal during network training. Although there have been numerous approaches to optimize the redistribution of the removed weights, there seems to be little or no study on the effect of activation functions on the performance of the Sparse Networks. This research provides insights into the relationship between the activation function used and the network performance at various sparsity levels.