Ovine enzootic abortion (OEA), caused by Chlamydia abortus, is an economically important disease in many countries. Inactivated vaccines have been used for many years as they induce immunity in sheep, although outbreaks of abortions have been described in vaccinated flocks. In addition, there is a commercially available live attenuated vaccine that provides good protective results. Recently however, reports question the attenuation of this vaccine and associate it with the appearance of outbreaks of OEA in vaccinated flocks. In the present study, a recently commercialized inactivated vaccine (INMEVA^®; Laboratorios Hipra S.A., Amer, Spain) has been evaluated using mouse and sheep experimental models. In the mouse models (non-pregnant and pregnant models), the efficacy of INMEVA vaccine has been compared to an unvaccinated control group and to an experimental inactivated vaccine considered as a positive protection control (UMU vaccine). In the non- pregnant model, the UMU vaccine was more effective than the INMEVA vaccine regarding the impact on body weight or the presence of C. abortus in the liver, but both vaccinated groups (UMU and INMEVA) had significantly lower C. abortus in the liver compared to the control group. In the pregnant model in terms of reproductive failures, pups per mouse or the presence of C. abortus in the liver or uterus, no significant differences were found between both vaccines, inducing protection compared to the control group. In the ovine pregnant model, where INMEVA vaccine was compared only to an unvaccinated group, the results indicate that this new commercial vaccine is safe and provides a suitable level of protection against an experimental challenge with C. abortus. A 75% reduction in reproductive disorders, 55% reduction in animals with C. abortus shedding on day of parturition/abortion, and a significant reduction of the average amount of chlamydial shedding from parturition/abortion over the next 21 days was observed, in relation to the infected control group. The results suggest that this vaccine is adequate for the control and prevention of OEA; however, future studies are necessary to elucidate the type of protective immune response that it induces.

A new multivalent vaccine (DIVENCE^®), containing live gE/tk double-gene-deleted BoHV-1, live-attenuated BRSV, inactivated PI3, and BVDV-1, and BVDV-2 recombinant proteins, has been designed to protect cattle against the main viral pathogens associated with bovine respiratory disease (BRD). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of DIVENCE^® against BRD in field conditions. A total of 360 animals from three different farms were included in this study. Calves were randomly distributed to the vaccinated (n = 183; DIVENCE^®) or control (n = 177; phosphate-buffered saline solution) group. All animals received two intramuscular doses (2 mL/dose) three weeks apart of the corresponding product. The entire fattening period (approximately 9 months) was monitored to assess the incidence, severity, and morbidity of BRD as well as administered treatments and growth performance. During this study, a BRSV outbreak was reported in one farm, where vaccinated animals had significantly (p < 0.02) lower morbidity (20.4%) and severity (score of 1.70) compared to the control group (53.70% and score of 2.11). Overall, vaccinated animals had a significantly lower number of cases (p < 0.001; 0.36 vs. 0.64 cases/calf), lower morbidity (p < 0.004; 26.78% vs. 41.24%), and lower antimicrobial treatments (p = 0.01; 33.3% vs. 57.4%) than control animals. Vaccinated animals presented significantly (p = 0.01) higher carcass weight than controls (6.58 kg). Vaccination with DIVENCE^® at the beginning of the fattening period decreased the incidence and morbidity of BRD following a BRSV outbreak. Additionally, the overall incidence and morbidity of BRD throughout the entire fattening period were reduced across farms. Thus, DIVENCE^® can improve economic outcomes in fattening units by reducing antibiotic treatments and enhancing performance.

Salmonella enterica serovar Abortusovis (S. Abortusovis) infection is one of the most important causes of infectious late-term abortion as well as birth of weak lambs in sheep in many countries throughout the world. Implementation of protocols based on the application of effective vaccines is one of the most effective approaches for controlling this disease, but variable efficacy has been reported, possibly related to factors associated with the host, the vaccine, the parameters used for determining efficacy and the challenge protocols. In this context, a new commercial inactivated vaccine (INMEVA; Laboratorios Hipra S.A., Spain) was evaluated in 20 control and 17 vaccinated gestating ewes, subcutaneously challenged at 90 days of gestation with 5 × 106 colony-forming units (cfu) of a wild strain of S. Abortusovis. Incidence of reproductive failures, bacterial vaginal excretion (by real time PCR), and lamb survival were evaluated as indicators of the vaccine's level of protection. Moreover, humoral response (by ELISA test in serum samples) was studied. Vaccination was showed to be safe under the study conditions. Vaccine efficacy was demonstrated in two different ways: i) it significantly decreased the percentage of abortions [29.4% (5/17) in the vaccinated group compared to the control group (65%; 13/20)] and ii) there was a significant reduction of the overall vaginal excretion in the sampling period (3.05 log cfu/mL ± 0.84 in the vaccinated group vs. 5.68 ± 0.67 in the control group). Given these results, the vaccine evaluated can be considered as an effective alternative for controlling S. Abortusovis infection in ovine flocks.

Background/Objectives: A new multivalent vaccine (DIVENCE^® PENTA), containing Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) types 1 and 2 recombinant proteins, live gE/tk double gene deleted Bovine Herpesvirus type 1 (BoHV-1 or IBR), live attenuated Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) and inactivated parainfluenza-3 virus (PI-3) has been designed to protect cattle against the main viral pathogens associated with Bovine respiratory disease (BRD). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of DIVENCE^® PENTA against experimental infections with BVDV-1, BVDV-2, IBR, BRSV and PI-3 in young calves. Methods: Ten-week-old calves were given two intramuscular doses three weeks apart. The efficacy was evaluated by means of an experimental challenge three weeks after vaccination. Serology, clinical signs, rectal temperature, white blood cell count, viral shedding and lung lesions were monitored after the challenge. Results/Conclusions: The results demonstrated a significant sparing of BRD in calves vaccinated with DIVENCE^® PENTA, as evidenced by fewer clinical signs, lower rectal temperatures, reduced viral shedding and less severe pulmonary lesions compared to control animals. A significant reduction in hyperthermia, leukopenia and viraemia post-challenge was also observed, highlighting the efficacy of the multivalent vaccine against BVDV types 1 and 2, IBR, BRSV and PI-3 in young calves.

Background: Our study evaluated the antibody responses against bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV)‐1 and BVDV‐2 generated by a novel subunit vaccine comprising BVDV‐1 E2 and BVDV‐2 E2 recombinant glycoproteins. Methods: Two trials were conducted. Cattle were given four intramuscular doses (D0, D21, D204 and D570) of 2 mL of vaccine (vaccinated) or phosphate‐buffered saline (control). In the first trial, 20 young calves were randomly distributed into the vaccinated or control group. Blood samples were collected to assess BVDV antibodies by ELISA and neutralisation. In the second trial, heifers and cows from three farms were assigned to the vaccinated and control groups. Individual blood samples, bulk tank milk (BTM) and individual milk samples were obtained. The antibody response against BVDV was analysed using different ELISA kits. Neutralising antibodies against different BVDV isolates from Europe and North and South America were also assessed in this trial. Results: Compared with the control group, the vaccine induced significantly ( p < 0.05) higher levels of antibodies against BVDV‐1 and BVDV‐2 from 21 days after the second dose until the end of the study. In the second trial, high levels of total antibodies against BVDV were observed, with no induction of anti‐p80 antibodies observed in vaccinated animals or in individual samples (milk and sera) or BTM samples. High levels of neutralising antibodies were observed against different BVDV isolates from Europe and America. Conclusions: The vaccine induced a strong antibody response against BVDV‐1 and BVDV‐2; this response allowed infected and vaccinated animals to be differentiated (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals (DIVA) vaccine).

A recent publication by Kerro Dego et al