Chris Kucharik

Prof. Chris Kucharik

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2001 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WCWolfgang Cramer
Wolfgang Cramer
ABAlberte Bondeau
Alberte Bondeau
FWF. Ian Woodward
F. Ian Woodward
IPI. Colin Prentice
I. Colin Prentice
RBRichard A. Betts
Richard A. Betts
CYChristine Young‐Molling
Christine Young‐Molling

1 September 2000 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChris Kucharik
Chris Kucharik
JFJonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley
CDChristine Delire
Christine Delire
VFVeronica A. Fisher
Veronica A. Fisher
Michael T. CoeMichael T. Coe
Michael T. Coe
SGStith T. Gower
Stith T. Gower
While a new class of Dynamic Global Ecosystem Models (DGEMs) has emerged in the past few years as an important tool for describing global biogeochemical cycles and atmosphere‐biosphere interactions, these models are still largely untested. Here we analyze the behavior of a new DGEM and compare the results to global‐scale observations of water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. In this study, we use version 2 of the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS), which includes several major improvements and additions to the prototype model developed by Foley et al. [1996]. IBIS is designed to be a comprehensive model of the terrestrial biosphere; the model represents a wide range of processes, including land surface physics, canopy physiology, plant phenology, vegetation dynamics and competition, and carbon and nutrient cycling. The model generates global simulations of the surface water balance (e.g., runoff), the terrestrial carbon balance (e.g., net primary production, net ecosystem exchange, soil carbon, aboveground and belowground litter, and soil CO2 fluxes), and vegetation structure (e.g., biomass, leaf area index, and vegetation composition). In order to test the performance of the model, we have assembled a wide range of continental and global‐scale data, including measurements of river discharge, net primary production, vegetation structure, root biomass, soil carbon, litter carbon, and soil CO2 flux. Using these field data and model results for the contemporary biosphere (1965–1994), our evaluation shows that simulated patterns of runoff, NPP, biomass, leaf area index, soil carbon, and total soil CO2 flux agree reasonably well with measurements that have been compiled from numerous ecosystems. These results also compare favorably to other global model results.

17 August 2010 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRachel Licker
Rachel Licker
MJMatt Johnston
Matt Johnston
JFJonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley
CBCarol Barford
Carol Barford
CKChris Kucharik
Chris Kucharik
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty

9 May 2007 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shawn P. UrbanskiShawn P. Urbanski
Shawn P. Urbanski
CBC. Barford
C. Barford
SWS. Wofsy
S. Wofsy
CKChris Kucharik
Chris Kucharik
EPE. Pyle
E. Pyle
J William MungerJ William Munger
J William Munger

26 December 1997 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGS. T. Gower
S. T. Gower
JVJ. G. Vogel
J. G. Vogel
JNJ. M. Norman
J. M. Norman
CKChris Kucharik
Chris Kucharik
SSS. J. Steele
S. J. Steele
TST. K. Stow
T. K. Stow

1 July 2011 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WSWilliam J. Sacks
William J. Sacks
CKChris Kucharik
Chris Kucharik