K. J. Wallace

Dr. K. J. Wallace

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2019 in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KWK. J. Wallace
K. J. Wallace
BCBruce Dudley Clarkson
Bruce Dudley Clarkson
Restoration of urban forest improves quality of life for city residents and is important for boosting native biodiversity. However, the scientific knowledge required to inform successful restoration is largely lacking for urban forest ecosystems, which differ from rural forests. Here we review two decades of urban forest restoration research in Hamilton, New Zealand and summarise key findings across seven major ecological topics: i. species traits, filters and thresholds, ii. species richness and target ecosystems, iii. tree regeneration, iv. seed banks and seed rain, v. seed predation, vi. enrichment planting and vii. restored forest function. We then discuss general urban restoration principles that increase the efficacy of urban restoration efforts including restore to a minimum of 10% indigenous cover in cities, develop a step‐wise restoration plan and prioritise partner engagement. The purpose of this review is to aid urban forest restoration across New Zealand and globally.

10 April 2017 in Ecological Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KWK. J. Wallace
K. J. Wallace
DLDaniel C. Laughlin
Daniel C. Laughlin
BCBruce D. Clarkson
Bruce D. Clarkson

28 October 2020 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMonique Mae Hall
Monique Mae Hall
PWPriscilla M. Wehi
Priscilla M. Wehi
HWHēmi Whaanga
Hēmi Whaanga
EWErana T. Walker
Erana T. Walker
JKJonni Hazeline Koia
Jonni Hazeline Koia
KWK. J. Wallace
K. J. Wallace

26 December 2012 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KWK. J. Wallace
K. J. Wallace
JHJudith Hough‐Goldstein
Judith Hough‐Goldstein

23 June 2020 in Ecohealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMartin Breed
Martin Breed
Adam CrossAdam Cross
Adam Cross
KWK. J. Wallace
K. J. Wallace
KBKeith Bradby
Keith Bradby
Emily FliesEmily Flies
Emily Flies
JAJames Aronson
James Aronson

13 December 2018 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWK. J. Wallace
K. J. Wallace
DLDaniel C. Laughlin
Daniel C. Laughlin
BCBruce D. Clarkson
Bruce D. Clarkson
LSLouis A. Schipper
Louis A. Schipper
Forest restoration has potential to recover degraded ecosystem functions in disturbed environments. Decomposition and denitrification are two critical functions involved in forest nutrient cycling that are often compromised in degraded ecosystems. As forest canopy structure develops following initial plantings, it may indirectly impact ecosystem functions by altering abiotic conditions. It is likely, however, that there are other abiotic factors that affect decomposition and denitrification that are unrelated to forest canopy structure. Here, we aimed to determine whether forest canopy openness, topography, and soil sand content would affect litter decomposition and denitrification by regulating the microclimate, the herbaceous plant layer, soil chemistry, and soil moisture. Research occurred in restored native temperate rainforest patches in two New Zealand cities. Urban forests are an excellent context for measuring impact of canopy restoration on ecosystem properties such as microclimate due to the extreme swings in city conditions (e.g., urban heat island). Decomposition rates were determined using leaf litter bags and denitrification rates through denitrification enzyme activity assays. We used structural equation modeling to quantify the direct and indirect drivers of these ecosystem functions. Results indicated that decomposition rates were positively related to soil moisture, relative humidity, and herbaceous plant cover. Interestingly, forest canopy openness indirectly affected decomposition through counteracting forces, meaning greater canopy openness in young forests permitted dense herbaceous plant growth which enhanced decomposition, while less canopy openness in older forests enhanced humidity levels which increased decomposition. Denitrification was negatively related to soil pH and positively related to soil moisture, but these abiotic factors were unrelated to the forest canopy. Discovering drivers of ecosystem functions can improve approaches to the restoration of degraded ecosystems, especially in disturbed urban areas. Identifying counteracting effects on ecosystem functions could improve management by focusing restoration actions on specific drivers to elicit desired changes. Some ecosystem processes, like denitrification, are not affected by forest canopy restoration or management, but are instead driven by edaphic and landscape factors.