Rubens Sonsol Gondim

Dr. Rubens Sonsol Gondim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2019 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNidia G. S. Campos
Nidia G. S. Campos
ARAtslands Rego da Rocha
Atslands Rego da Rocha
RGRubens Sonsol Gondim
Rubens Sonsol Gondim
TSTiciana L. Coelho Da Silva
Ticiana L. Coelho Da Silva
Danielo G. GomesDanielo G. Gomes
Danielo G. Gomes
Irrigation is one of the most water-intensive agricultural activities in the world, which has been increasing over time. Choosing an optimal irrigation management plan depends on having available data in the monitoring field. A smart agriculture system gathers data from several sources; however, the data are not guaranteed to be free of discrepant values (i.e., outliers), which can damage the precision of irrigation management. Furthermore, data from different sources must fit into the same temporal window required for irrigation management and the data preprocessing must be dynamic and automatic to benefit users of the irrigation management plan. In this paper, we propose the Smart&Green framework to offer services for smart irrigation, such as data monitoring, preprocessing, fusion, synchronization, storage, and irrigation management enriched by the prediction of soil moisture. Outlier removal techniques allow for more precise irrigation management. For fields without soil moisture sensors, the prediction model estimates the matric potential using weather, crop, and irrigation information. We apply the predicted matric potential approach to the Van Genutchen model to determine the moisture used in an irrigation management scheme. We can save, on average, between 56.4% and 90% of the irrigation water needed by applying the Zscore, MZscore and Chauvenet outlier removal techniques to the predicted data.

1 April 2022 in Future Generation Computer Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matheus Gomes CordeiroMatheus Gomes Cordeiro
Matheus Gomes Cordeiro
CMCatherine Bezerra Markert
Catherine Bezerra Markert
SASayonara S. Araújo
Sayonara S. Araújo
NCNídia G.S. Campos
Nídia G.S. Campos
RGRubens Sonsol Gondim
Rubens Sonsol Gondim
ARAtslands Rego da Rocha
Atslands Rego da Rocha

1 April 2020 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrei Bosco Bezerra TorresAndrei Bosco Bezerra Torres
Andrei Bosco Bezerra Torres
ARAtslands Rego da Rocha
Atslands Rego da Rocha
TSTiciana L. Coelho da Silva
Ticiana L. Coelho da Silva
JSJOSE DE SOUZA
JOSE DE SOUZA
RGRubens Sonsol Gondim
Rubens Sonsol Gondim

1 December 2018 in Revista Caatinga
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRubens Sonsol Gondim
Rubens Sonsol Gondim
CMCelli Rodrigues Muniz
Celli Rodrigues Muniz
CLCarlos Eduardo Pacheco Lima
Carlos Eduardo Pacheco Lima
CSCarlos Levi Anastácio DOS Santos
Carlos Levi Anastácio DOS Santos
Biochar is a solid material formed during biomass thermochemical decomposition processes. This organic compound has particular properties that may cause effects on soils depending on its feedstock and processing conditions. Thus, the characteristics and purpose of use of this material must be recognized prior to its use. Two types of biochar, derived from different wood sources, were compared, one from caatinga biome species and another from cashew trees. Two species from caatinga biome were used, jurema-preta (Mimosa tenuiflora Willd. Poir.), and marmeleiro (Croton sonderianus Müll. Arg.). This study aimed to identify the best biochar material regionally available to increase water-holding capacity in the soil, based on laboratory tests and microstructural porosity evaluation. Biochar from Caatinga wood demonstrated an improved water-holding capacity if compared to cashew wood biochar. The particle diameters of 2 and 4 mm showed the highest levels, which were 2,268 g.g-1 for caatinga wood and 0.574 g.g-1 for cashew wood biochars, respectively. While the smaller quantities of macropores and a larger number of micropores (smaller radius) could explain the higher water-holding capacity for biochar from caatinga wood, the thick lignified cell walls of biochar from cashew wood support the idea of a hydrophobic effect contributing to water lower holding capacity.

22 February 2024 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DWDavid Walker
David Walker
JOJuliana Lima Oliveira
Juliana Lima Oliveira
LCLouise Cavalcante
Louise Cavalcante
SKSarra Kchouk
Sarra Kchouk
GNGermano Ribeiro Neto
Germano Ribeiro Neto
Pieter van OelPieter van Oel
Pieter van Oel

1 January 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMaria Cléa Brito Figueirêdo
Maria Cléa Brito Figueirêdo
JPJosé Potting
José Potting
LSLuiz Augusto Lopes Serrano
Luiz Augusto Lopes Serrano
MBMarlos Alves Bezerra
Marlos Alves Bezerra
VBViviane da Silva Barros
Viviane da Silva Barros
TNThomas Nemecek
Thomas Nemecek