The adsorption/desorption characteristics for light and heavy rare earth elements (REEs) on halloysite and illite (which are beneficial for the utilization of ion-adsorption RE ore) were systematically investigated and compared. Additionally, halloysite and illite were fully charactered by XRD, SEM, microscope, zeta potential, nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and buffer pH to build the relationship between adsorption/desorption mechanisms and the minerals’ properties. The results of experiments show that the adsorption rate of halloysite is higher than illite, although they are both very fast and follow the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The adsorption capacity of halloysite and illite increases with an increase in adsorption pH and remains constant when pH is higher than 4. Due to the narrow interlamellar spacing of halloysite and the fact that it is a nanotube, RE ions are adsorbed only through electrostatic attraction, whereas the adsorption and desorption pH have a significant effect on the recovery of RE ions from illite, because of the diverse adsorption mechanism. The results illustrated that the structure and surface properties of clays are also the key factors that affect RE ions leaching.

The galvanic interaction between chalcopyrite and monoclinic pyrrhotite and its effect on flotation separation were studied using monomineral flotation tests, adsorption capacity tests, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) test. These results showed that the interaction promoted the reduction of O₂ on the cathodic chalcopyrite surface and accelerated the generation of Fe(OH)₃, which was not conducive to collector adsorption; hence, the flotation recovery decreased by 10–16%. On the other hand, galvanic interaction accelerated the oxidation of S on the anodic monoclinic pyrrhotite surface to S₀ or SO₄²⁻ and produced a large amount of H⁺, thus preventing the formation of Fe(OH)₃. Meanwhile, the Cu²⁺ eluted from chalcopyrite surface activated monoclinic pyrrhotite; hence, the flotation recovery increased by 3–10%. Galvanic interaction reduced the floatability difference between the two minerals, and the separation difficulty was significantly increased. Even with an increase in the amount of lime, the separation could not be improved.