John Dearing

Prof. John Dearing

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1996 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJohn Dearing
John Dearing
RDR. J. L. Dann
R. J. L. Dann
KHK. Hay
K. Hay
JLJ. A. Lees
J. A. Lees
PLP. J. Loveland
P. J. Loveland
KOK. O'Grady
K. O'Grady
Summary. The theory, measurement and interpretation of frequency-dependent susceptibility (χFD) are examined. A new model is proposed which explains χFD in ter

18 November 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RWRong Wang
Rong Wang
JDJohn Dearing
John Dearing
PLPeter G. Langdon
Peter G. Langdon
EZEnlou Zhang
Enlou Zhang
XYXiangdong Yang
Xiangdong Yang
MSMarten Scheffer
Marten Scheffer

1 July 2016 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XBXuemei Bai
Xuemei Bai
SLSander van der Leeuw
Sander van der Leeuw
KOKaren O’bRien
Karen O’bRien
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout
FBFrank Biermann
Frank Biermann
JSJames Syvitski
James Syvitski
Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.ISI Document Delivery No.: DT0HSTimes Cited: 1Cited Reference Count: 129Bai, Xuemei van der Leeuw, Sander O'Brien, Karen Berkhout, Frans Biermann, Frank Brondizio, Eduardo S. Cudennec, Christophe Dearing, John Duraiappah, Anantha Glaser, Marion Revkin, Andrew Steffen, Will Syvitski, JamesElsevier sci ltdOxfordWhile the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd

1 September 2014 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JDJohn Dearing
John Dearing
RWRong Wang
Rong Wang
KZKe Zhang
Ke Zhang
JDJames G. Dyke
James G. Dyke
HHHelmut Haberl
Helmut Haberl
GPGuy M. Poppy
Guy M. Poppy
Humanity faces a major global challenge in achieving wellbeing for all, while simultaneously ensuring that the biophysical processes and ecosystem services that underpin wellbeing are exploited within scientifically informed boundaries of sustainability. We propose a framework for defining the safe and just operating space for humanity that integrates social wellbeing into the original planetary boundaries concept (Rockström et al., 2009a,b) for application at regional scales. We argue that such a framework can: (1) increase the policy impact of the boundaries concept as most governance takes place at the regional rather than planetary scale; (2) contribute to the understanding and dissemination of complexity thinking throughout governance and policy-making; (3) act as a powerful metaphor and communication tool for regional equity and sustainability. We demonstrate the approach in two rural Chinese localities where we define the safe and just operating space that lies between an environmental ceiling and a social foundation from analysis of time series drawn from monitored and palaeoecological data, and from social survey statistics respectively. Agricultural intensification has led to poverty reduction, though not eradicated it, but at the expense of environmental degradation. Currently, the environmental ceiling is exceeded for degraded water quality at both localities even though the least well-met social standards are for available piped water and sanitation. The conjunction of these social needs and environmental constraints around the issue of water access and quality illustrates the broader value of the safe and just operating space approach for sustainable development
1

1 December 1996 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJohn Dearing
John Dearing
KHK. L. Hay
K. L. Hay
SBS. M. J. Baban
S. M. J. Baban
AHA. S. Huddleston
A. S. Huddleston
EWE. M. H. Wellington
E. M. H. Wellington
PLP. J. Loveland
P. J. Loveland
Summary. Magnetic susceptibility values for topsoils across England arc combined with data for soil type, geochemistry and concentrations of magnetotactic bact

1 January 2008 in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMark Pelling
Mark Pelling
CHChris High
Chris High
JDJohn Dearing
John Dearing
DSDenis Smith
Denis Smith
Recent UK government policy on climate change, and wider policy movement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, emphasise the building of adaptive capacity. But what are the institutional constraints that shape capacity to build adaptive organisations? The authors synthesise theory from social learning and institutional aspects of multilevel environmental governance to help unpack the patterns of individual and collective action within organisations that can enhance or restrict organisational adaptive capacity in the face of abrupt climate change. Theoretical synthesis is grounded by empirical work with a local dairy farmers group and two supporting public sector bodies that are both local actors in their own rights and which also shape the operating environment for other local actors (the Environment Agency and the Welsh Assembly and Assembly-sponsored public bodies). Providing space within and between local organisations for individuals to develop private as well as officially sanctioned social relationships is supported as a pathway to enable social learning. It is also a resource for adaptation that requires little financial investment but does call for a rethinking of the personal skills and working routines that are incentivised within organisations.