Daniela Iacopino

Dr. Daniela Iacopino

Nanotechnology Group, Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Dyke Parade, T12R5CP, Cork, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 October 2014 in Nano Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAndrea Pescaglini
Andrea Pescaglini
AMAlfonso Martín
Alfonso Martín
DCDavide Cammi
Davide Cammi
GJGediminas Juska
Gediminas Juska
CRCarsten Ronning
Carsten Ronning
Daniela IacopinoDaniela Iacopino
Daniela Iacopino

1 August 2019 in Talanta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAbeer Alyami
Abeer Alyami
AQAidan J. Quinn
Aidan J. Quinn
Daniela IacopinoDaniela Iacopino
Daniela Iacopino

11 December 2007 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DODeirdre M. O’Carroll
Deirdre M. O’Carroll
Daniela IacopinoDaniela Iacopino
Daniela Iacopino
Alan O’RiordanAlan O’Riordan
Alan O’Riordan
PLPierre Lovera
Pierre Lovera
ÉOÉ. O'COnnor
É. O'COnnor
GRGareth Redmond
Gareth Redmond

30 March 2022 in ACS Applied Electronic Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AIAlessandra Imbrogno
Alessandra Imbrogno
JIJahidul Islam
Jahidul Islam
CSChiara Santillo
Chiara Santillo
Rachele CastaldoRachele Castaldo
Rachele Castaldo
LSLabrini Sygellou
Labrini Sygellou
Daniela IacopinoDaniela Iacopino
Daniela Iacopino

19 March 2005 in Chemistry of Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAndrea Ongaro
Andrea Ongaro
FGFionn Griffin
Fionn Griffin
PBPaul Beecher
Paul Beecher
LNLorraine Nagle
Lorraine Nagle
Daniela IacopinoDaniela Iacopino
Daniela Iacopino
DFDonald Fitzmaurice
Donald Fitzmaurice

23 June 2021 in ACS Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRichard Murray
Richard Murray
MBMicheal Burke
Micheal Burke
Daniela IacopinoDaniela Iacopino
Daniela Iacopino
AQAidan J. Quinn
Aidan J. Quinn
Realization of graphene-based sensors and electronic devices remains challenging, in part due to integration challenges with current fabrication and manufacturing processes. Thus, scalable methods for in situ fabrication of high-quality graphene-like materials are essential. Low-cost CO2 laser engravers can be used for site-selective conversion of polyimide under ambient conditions to create 3-D, rotationally disordered, few-layer, porous, graphene-like electrodes. However, the influences of non-linear parameter terms and interactions between key parameters on the graphitization process present challenges for rapid, resource-efficient optimization. An iterative optimization strategy was developed to identify promising regions in parameter space for two key parameters, laser power and scan speed, with the goal of optimizing electrode performance while maximizing scan speed and hence fabrication throughput. The strategy employed iterations of Design of Experiments Response Surface (DoE-RS) methods combined with choices of readily measurable parameters to minimize measurement resources and time. The initial DoE-RS experiment set employed visual response parameters, while subsequent iterations used sheet resistance as the optimization parameter. The final model clearly demonstrates that laser graphitization through raster scanning is a highly non-linear process requiring polynomial terms in scan speed and laser power up to fifth order. Two regions of interest in parameter space were identified using this strategy: Region 1 represents the global minimum for sheet resistance for this laser (∼16 Ω/sq), found at a low scan speed (70 mm/s) and a low average power (2.1 W) . Region 2 is a local minimum for sheet resistance (36 Ω/sq), found at higher values for scan speed (340 mm/s) and average power (3.4 W), allowing ∼5-fold reduction in write time. Importantly, these minima do not correspond to constant ratios of average laser power to scan speed. This highlights the benefits of DoE-RS methods in rapid identification of optimum parameter combinations that would be difficult to discover using traditional one-factor-at-a-time optimization. Verification data from Raman spectroscopy showed sharp 2D peaks with mean full-width-at-half-maximum intensity values <80 cm–1 for both regions, consistent with high-quality 3D graphene-like carbon. Graphene-based electrodes fabricated using the parameters from the respective regions yielded similar performance when employed as capacitive humidity sensors with hygroscopic dielectric layers. Devices fabricated using Region 1 parameters (16 Ω/sq) yielded capacitance responses of 0.78 ± 0.04 pF at 0% relative humidity (RH), increasing to 31 ± 7 pF at 85.1% RH. Region 2 devices (36 Ω/sq) showed comparable responses (0.88 ± 0.04 pF at 0% RH, 28 ± 5 pF at 85.1% RH).