Thailand is the epicenter of elephant tourism and visiting an elephant camp is a popular activity according to the Tourist Authority of Thailand. However, the welfare of these elephants has been questioned by animal activist groups, international tour operators, and the public. Conclusions that the vast majority of captive elephants are abused often are based on anecdotal evidence and not solid science. So, it is difficult to tease apart emotion, opinion, and fact with regard to what practices are good or bad for elephant welfare. The aim of this paper was to: (1) describe the unique status of captive elephants in Thailand and associated regulations, (2) summarize current issues and challenges facing elephant tourism, (3) review studies conducted on welfare of tourist elephants in Thailand, and (4) offer recommendations for how elephants can be properly cared for under captive conditions in tourist camps. We conclude there are many ways to manage these elephants, and that not all tourist activities are bad for welfare. However, it is essential they be managed in a way that meets physical, physiological and psychological needs, and that management decisions are based on objective data.

Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.

Captive elephant must be properly fed to meet their nutritional demands, supporting optimal growth and development to achieve their providing conservation through tourism. This study aimed to revision of the feed management practices of private elephant camps in Chiangmai province. An archival review and in depth interviews of key informants involving the elephant camps owners or managers located in Chiangmai were conducted. The interview showed that staple roughage of most camps was hybrid napier grass while once is sweet corn soilage. The majority of the large elephant camps with more than 30 elephants which were fed by the camp. Elephants' dietary requirements were addressed under the supervision of veterinarians. The delivery of roughage of large camps coincided with small camp size which the middle man played an important role for gathering, harvesting, transporting and feeding the roughage to the elephants raised in the camps. The diary was fed 10 percent of their weight or about 100-120 kg roughage per individual. Most of the camp, roughage was divided into four to five meals each day. The study's findings for the tiny elephant camps' food management revealed that including elephants in greeting activities for eco-tourists so that they can eat while traveling the hiking trails. The camp also bought bananas and sugar cane from local farmers to sell to visitors for the purpose of feeding the elephants. However, a COVID-19 outbreak that occurred during the research period prevented the elephant camp from earning money from the tourism sector, which reduced the amount of food available.

Background: Approximately one-third of Asian elephants are managed under human care, participating in educational, cultural, religious, and tourist activities. Management conditions vary considerably among venues, raising questions about whether welfare needs are consistently being met, particularly for Asian tourist camp elephants. To evaluate the well-being of elephants engaged in tourist activities, an evidence-based tool is needed for routine assessments to identify potential welfare risks, aid in the development of better camp standards, and enable caretakers to address specific concerns. While many animal welfare tools exist, none have been designed to consider specific environments and management practices faced by elephants living and working in tourist camps. Methods: Using direct observations and interviews, the Elephant Welfare Assessment Tool (EWAT) was developed for tourist camp elephants using the Five Domains Model as a framework. Measures were selected based on peer-reviewed literature, existing standards and guidelines, and opinions from animal welfare experts working with zoo and tourist camp elephants. The EWAT differs from existing tools by including criteria on work activities and restraint methods (e.g., chaining and ankus use), factors common in Asia but not often encountered by western zoo elephants. Measures were scored using a 0–2 Likert Scale. The tool was tested in Thailand and determined by calculating a content validity index (CVI) and conducting inter-rater and test-retest reliability tests. Results: The initial tool included 18 animal-based and 21 resource-based measures across four domains: Nutrition (n = 5), Environment (n = 14), Health (n = 10), and Behavior and Mental State (n = 10). Index scores of content validity (CVI) (Item CVI (0.83), Scale CVI/Average (0.98), and Scale CVI/Universal (0.89)) were high. Measures scoring less than 0.83 were removed: the opportunity to mate, the mahout-elephant relationship, and mahout job satisfaction. The final tool consisted of 42 questions related to 36 measures, including 18 animal-based and 18 resource-based measures within the Nutrition (n = 5), Environment (n = 11), Health (n = 10), and Behavior and Mental State (n = 10) domains. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for inter-rater reliability (0.78–0.90, p < 0.05) and test-retest (0.77–0.91, p < 0.05) analyses conducted at two camps showed good agreement. Conclusions: This new assessment tool (EWAT) is a context-specific, holistic method designed to offer a practical means of conducting individual and institutional-level assessments of elephant welfare in tourist camps. It is based on the Five Domains Model using reliable and validated animal- and resource-based measures, data collection through direct observation and interviews, and a numerical scoring system. The tool includes several criteria applicable to tourist rather than zoo venues to make it more relevant to the challenges faced by working elephants in Asia.

Background and Aim: Elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus hemorrhagic disease (EEHV-HD) is a leading cause of fatal hemorrhagic illness in juvenile Asian elephants (Elephas maximus), often requiring urgent plasma transfusion. However, the biochemical stability of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) during long-term storage has not been systematically evaluated in this species. This study assessed the stability of key plasma proteins, fibrinogen, clotting factor VIII, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and albumin, in FFP stored at −20°C for 4, 8, and 12 months, and compared them with fresh plasma to determine suitability for emergency clinical use. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 20 healthy elephants and processed into fresh and frozen aliquots. Fibrinogen concentrations were quantified using the Clauss assay, factor VIII activity via a one-stage clotting assay, and IgG and albumin concentrations using colorimetric methods. A repeated-measures generalized linear model evaluated the effects of storage duration on protein stability, with post hoc Tukey adjustments. Results: Fibrinogen concentrations remained stable during storage, with no significant differences at 8 or 12 months compared with fresh plasma. Factor VIII activity declined progressively, with a significant 16% reduction after 12 months (p < 0.001), though values remained within clinically acceptable ranges. Conversely, IgG and albumin concentrations increased significantly during frozen storage, with 37% and 21% higher values, respectively, at 12 months, likely reflecting cryoconcentration. Neither sex nor other covariates significantly influenced protein stability. Conclusion: This study provides the first evidence that elephant FFP stored at −20°C retains acceptable biochemical stability for up to 12 months. Although factor VIII activity decreases over time, fibrinogen remains stable, and immunoproteins increase, supporting the clinical utility of stored plasma in EEHV-HD emergencies. These findings provide foundational guidance for establishing elephant plasma banking protocols, improving readiness for rapid intervention, and advancing One Health–aligned conservation strategies for endangered megafauna. Keywords: Asian elephant, coagulation factors, EEHV hemorrhagic disease, factor VIII activity, fibrinogen stability, fresh-frozen plasma, plasma banking protocols, wildlife transfusion medicine.

The tiger (Panthera tigris) is an apex predator and plays a fundamental role in sustaining biodiversity through its native range in Asia. By controlling populations of large herbivores and mesopredators, tigers help maintain the structural integrity of habitats, thereby supporting a diverse array of flora and fauna. Despite its ecological importance, the tiger is one of the most threatened large carnivores globally. It is classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, although threat categories vary among subspecies, and it is listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which covers all tiger subspecies. Over the past two decades, global tiger populations have declined by more than 90%. Consequently, they have become the focus of conservation efforts, including captive breeding and reintroduction initiatives. However, the reintroduction of captive-bred tigers into natural habitats presents significant scientific and logistical challenges. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the complexities of using captive tigers for reintroduction programs, with particular attention to welfare and behavioral competence of captive individuals, and genetic diversity and health of founder populations. It further addresses critical considerations for habitat suitability and managing potential human-tiger conflict and evaluates the overall effectiveness and feasibility of tiger reintroduction as a conservation strategy.