The purpose of this article is to offer a synthesis of the characteristics of social resilience, integrating the different approaches received from the social sciences. We propose to focus this conceptual framework as a previous and necessary step for the later study of the possible ways of promotion of this social resilience, that will help to strengthen the welfare and public health systems. The paper explores the difficulties in defining these characteristics, identifying their constituent elements. After this, the paper study the challenges to the future development of resilience models, showing the ways that offer some advances. Finally, we conclude that the social resilience must be conceived as a dynamic, multi-level, and evolutionary process if we are to help societies not only cope with adversity but also to adapt and transform themselves.
Rapid depletion of fossil fuel reserves forces the global energy sector to transition to sustainable energy sources. Specifically, distributed energy markets have emerged in the renewable energy sector in recent years, partly because blockchain technology is becoming a successful way to promote secure and transparent transactions. Using its decentralized structure, transparency, and even pseudonymity, blockchain is increasingly adopted worldwide for large-scale energy trading, peer-to-peer exchanges, project financing, supply chain management, and asset tracking. The research comprehensively analyzes blockchain applications across multiple fields related to energy, bibliographically evaluating their transformative potential. In addition, the study explores the architecture of various blockchain systems, assesses critical security and privacy challenges, and discusses how blockchain can enhance operational efficiency, transparency, and reliability in the energy sector. The paper’s findings provide a roadmap for future developments and the strategic adoption of blockchain technologies in the evolving energy landscape for an effective energy transition.
This paper proposes a methodological architecture to integrate Q-learning into economic modelling systematically. It addresses a common gap: the lack of a shared framework linking economic foundations to Reinforcement Learning components. Rather than introducing a new algorithm, it specifies and reports how preferences, frictions, information structures, and time horizons map to the reward function, discount factor, and learning environment design. Equilibrium outcomes serve as benchmarks for comparing learned policies, not as imposed axioms. This approach interprets learning dynamics through standard economic categories and enables comparability across studies. The architecture organizes models along explicit dimensions: behavioural preferences, institutional frictions, economic environment class, information structure, learning and exploration mechanisms, and evaluation metrics. A simulation illustrates how variations in frictions, risk attitudes, and intertemporal preferences affect learned policies, their stability, and their relationship to static benchmarks. The paper aims to promote the cumulative use of Reinforcement Learning in applied economics by providing a general specification that improves interpretability, comparability, and reproducibility, turning deviations from theoretical equilibria into measurable diagnostics that refine economic fundamentals.