Low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) are a group of food additives characterized by their high sweetness intensity and virtually zero caloric content, attributes that make them potential substitutes for added sugars in processed foods and beverages. However, there is currently scarce information available about both the different LNCS used in food products available in Spain and their consumption patterns. Prompted by these reasons, the aim of this research work was to identify the presence and consumption of LNCS in food and beverages consumed by a representative sample of the Spanish adult population (n = 507). For this purpose, a Food Frequency Questionnaire was carried out. Overall, it was found that 4.5% of the foods and 22.3% of the beverages consumed by the surveyed population contained LNCS. The food groups that presented the highest percentage of daily servings containing LNCS were non-alcoholic beverages such as soft drinks and juices (36.1%); sugars and sweets such as chocolates, candies, or chewing gum (14.2%); milk and dairy products (7.0%); meat and derivative products (5.1%); cereals and derivatives (4.3%); appetizers (1.7%); and, finally, sauces and condiments such as ketchup or mustard (1.0%). The main LNCS consumed were acesulfame-K, sucralose, sorbitol, aspartame, and cyclamate, although their prevalence of use differs greatly among foods, beverages, or tabletop sweeteners. Our results show the great diversity of food groups that are currently including these compounds as ingredients. Consequently, there is a need for these food additives to be included in food composition databases, which should be regularly updated to include LNCS in order to facilitate their assessment and monitoring in dietary nutritional surveys.

The use of low and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) in food and beverages has become increasingly common in the development and reformulation of products to reduce energy derived from added sugars. Our aim was to identify the presence and consumption of LNCS through food and beverages according to consumption patterns in a representative sample (n = 256) of the Portuguese adult population. The study had a descriptive cross-sectional observational design and was based on the application of a Food Frequency Questionnaire. Overall, it was found that 4.1% of the foods and 16.7% of the beverages consumed by the Portuguese adult population contained LNCS. Food groups mostly contributing to LNCS consumption were non-alcoholic beverages such as soft drinks and juices (34.2%); milk and dairy products (16.5%); appetizers such as chips (8.6%); sugars and sweets such as chocolates, candies, or chewing gums (6.1%); meat and derivative products (2.2%); cereals and derivatives (1.2%) and canned fruits (1.2%). Main LNCS consumed were acesulfame-K, sucralose, and aspartame, single or combined, although their prevalence of use differs greatly among foods, beverages, or tabletop sweeteners. In conclusion, LNCS were found across a wide variety of products available in the Portuguese market and their prevalence of inclusion in the diet of the population evidences the need to develop more studies on the evolution of LNCS intake and its impact on the full dietary model and health. Consequently, these food additives should be included in food composition databases and, periodically, updated to reflect the recurrent reformulation strategies adopted by the food industry in its efforts to reduce the energy contribution of added sugars.

Background/Objectives: Childhood obesity and nutritional inequalities remain major public health challenges, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged settings. In Spain, these disparities are reflected in unequal access to healthy food and differing health outcomes among the young population. This study aimed to explore how social vulnerability influences dietary patterns, body composition, and food insecurity among children and adolescents, with a particular focus on sex differences. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 280 participants aged 6 to 15 years old, recruited from urban areas across Spain. Two groups were evaluated, a socioeconomically vulnerable group (VG) (n = 175) and a non-vulnerable group (NVG) (n = 105), classified according to socioeconomic and social established criteria. Validated tools were used to assess diet quality, adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD), consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF), and household food insecurity. Anthropometric measurements were also collected, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated using both national and international reference standards. Results: Vulnerable children and adolescents showed higher prevalence of food insecurity, less favorable body composition indicators, and lower global dietary quality, characterized by lower adherence to the MD and higher consumption of UPF. Multivariate analysis confirmed that socioeconomic vulnerability was significantly associated with female sex, higher BMI, lower adherence to the MD, and greater consumption of UPF. Conclusions: Our findings highlight a concerning pattern of health and nutritional inequality among children and adolescents based on socioeconomic status. There is a clear and urgent need for effective public health strategies with an equity focus that promote healthy and affordable eating habits from early life, especially in the most disadvantaged environments and targeted by gender.