Mahdi Panahi

Dr. Mahdi Panahi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wahyu Luqmanul HakimWahyu Luqmanul Hakim
Wahyu Luqmanul Hakim
Fatemeh RezaieFatemeh Rezaie
Fatemeh Rezaie
Arip Syaripudin NurArip Syaripudin Nur
Arip Syaripudin Nur
MPMahdi Panahi
Mahdi Panahi
Khabat KhosraviKhabat Khosravi
Khabat Khosravi
Saro LeeSaro Lee
Saro Lee


29 June 2022 in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHossein Hamedi
Hossein Hamedi
AAAli Asghar Alesheikh
Ali Asghar Alesheikh
MPMahdi Panahi
Mahdi Panahi
Saro LeeSaro Lee
Saro Lee

7 December 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RLRu Liu
Ru Liu
JPJianbing Peng
Jianbing Peng
YLYanqiu Leng
Yanqiu Leng
Saro LeeSaro Lee
Saro Lee
MPMahdi Panahi
Mahdi Panahi
Xia ZhaoXia Zhao
Xia Zhao
Landslides are one of the most frequent and important natural disasters in the world. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the landslide susceptibility in Zhenping County using a hybrid of support vector regression (SVR) with grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and firefly algorithm (FA) by frequency ratio (FR) preprocessed. Therefore, a landslide inventory composed of 140 landslides and 16 landslide conditioning factors is compiled as a landslide database. Among these landslides, 70% (98) landslides were randomly selected as the training dataset of the model, and the other landslides (42) were used to verify the model. The 16 landslide conditioning factors include elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), landslide, rainfall, soil and lithology. The conditioning factors selection and spatial correlation analysis were carried out by using the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method and the frequency ratio (FR) algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and kappa data of the training dataset and validation dataset are used to evaluate the prediction ability and the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages of landslide susceptibility maps. The results show that the SVR-GWO model (AUROC = 0.854) has the best performance in landslide spatial prediction, followed by the SVR-FA (AUROC = 0.838) and SVR models (AUROC = 0.818). The hybrid models of SVR-GWO and SVR-FA improve the performance of the single SVR model, and all three models have good prospects for regional-scale landslide spatial modeling.

1 January 2022 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fatemeh RezaieFatemeh Rezaie
Fatemeh Rezaie
MPMahdi Panahi
Mahdi Panahi
JLJongchun Lee
Jongchun Lee
JLJungsub Lee
Jungsub Lee
SKSeonhong Kim
Seonhong Kim
Saro LeeSaro Lee
Saro Lee