Ali Asghar Alesheikh

Prof. Ali Asghar Alesheikh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2007 in International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAli Asghar Alesheikh
Ali Asghar Alesheikh
AGA. Ghorbanali
A. Ghorbanali
NNN. Nouri
N. Nouri

1 July 2009 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMohammad H. Vahidnia
Mohammad H. Vahidnia
AAAli Asghar Alesheikh
Ali Asghar Alesheikh
AAAbbas Alimohammadi
Abbas Alimohammadi

1 September 2010 in Computers & Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMohammad H. Vahidnia
Mohammad H. Vahidnia
AAAli Asghar Alesheikh
Ali Asghar Alesheikh
AAAbbas Alimohammadi
Abbas Alimohammadi
FHFarhad Hosseinali
Farhad Hosseinali

8 September 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wei ChenWei Chen
Wei Chen
HHHaoyuan Hong
Haoyuan Hong
Mahdi PanahiMahdi Panahi
Mahdi Panahi
Himan ShahabiHiman Shahabi
Himan Shahabi
Yi WangYi Wang
Yi Wang
BABaharin Bin Ahmad
Baharin Bin Ahmad
The most dangerous landslide disasters always cause serious economic losses and human deaths. The contribution of this work is to present an integrated landslide modelling framework, in which an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is combined with the two optimization algorithms of whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) at Anyuan County, China. It means that WOA and GWO are used as two meta-heuristic algorithms to improve the prediction performance of the ANFIS-based methods. In addition, the step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method is used to obtain the initial weight of each class of landslide influencing factors. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, 315 landslide events in history were selected for our experiments and were randomly divided into the training and verification sets. To perform landslide susceptibility mapping, fifteen geological, hydrological, geomorphological, land cover, and other factors are considered for the modelling construction. The landslide susceptibility maps by SWARA, SWARA-ANFIS, SWARA-ANFIS-PSO, SWARA-ANFIS-WOA, and SWARA-ANFIS-GWO models are assessed using the measures of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The experiments demonstrated that the obtained results of modelling process from the SWARA to the SAWRA-ANFIS-GWO model were more accurate and that the proposed methods have satisfactory prediction ability. Specifically, prediction accuracy by area under the curve (AUC) of SWARA, SWARA-ANFIS, SWARA-ANFIS-PSO, SWARA-ANFIS-GWO, and SWARA-ANFIS-WOA models were 0.831, 0.831, 0.850, 0.856, and 0.869, respectively. Due to adaptability and usability, the proposed prediction methods can be applied to other areas for landslide management and mitigation as well as prevention throughout the world.

26 August 2020 in Journal of Navigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADanial Alizadeh
Danial Alizadeh
AAAli Asghar Alesheikh
Ali Asghar Alesheikh
MSMohammad Sharif
Mohammad Sharif
For maritime safety and security, vessels should be able to predict the trajectories of nearby vessels to avoid collision. This research proposes three novel models based on similarity search of trajectories that predict vessels' trajectories in the short and long term. The first and second prediction models are, respectively, point-based and trajectory-based models that consider constant distances between target and sample trajectories. The third prediction model is a trajectory-based model that exploits a long short-term memory approach to measure the dynamic distance between target and sample trajectories. To evaluate the performance of the proposed models, they are applied to a real automatic identification system (AIS) vessel dataset in the Strait of Georgia, USA. The models' accuracies in terms of Haversine distance between the predicted and actual positions show relative prediction error reductions of 40·85% for the second model compared with the first model and 23% for the third model compared with the second model.

1 April 2013 in Cities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHFarhad Hosseinali
Farhad Hosseinali
AAAli Asghar Alesheikh
Ali Asghar Alesheikh
FNFarshad Nourian
Farshad Nourian