While eHealth can help improve outcomes for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation, the implementation and integration of eHealth is often complex and time-consuming. To use eHealth effectively in geriatric rehabilitation, it is essential to understand the experiences and needs of healthcare professionals. In this international multicentre cross-sectional study, we used a web-based survey to explore the use, benefits, feasibility and usability of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation settings, together with the needs of working healthcare professionals. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative findings. The survey was completed by 513 healthcare professionals from 16 countries. Over half had experience with eHealth, although very few (52 of 263 = 20%) integrated eHealth into daily practice. Important barriers to the use or implementation of eHealth included insufficient resources, lack of an organization-wide implementation strategy and lack of knowledge. Professionals felt that eHealth is more complex for patients than for themselves, and also expressed a need for reliable information concerning available eHealth interventions and their applications. While eHealth has clear benefits, important barriers hinder successful implementation and integration into healthcare. Tailored implementation strategies and reliable information on effective eHealth applications are needed to overcome these barriers.

The microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) comprises a complex bidirectional communication network integrating neural, immune, metabolic, and endocrine pathways. Dopamine, traditionally viewed as a central neurotransmitter, also plays essential roles in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, where it regulates motility, secretion, barrier homeostasis, and mucosal immunity. Growing evidence indicates that the gut microbiota significantly contributes to intestinal dopamine metabolism through specialized enzymatic pathways, particularly tyrosine decarboxylase in Enterococcus species and catechol dehydroxylase in Eggerthella species. These microbial reactions compete with host processes, alter dopaminergic tone, and degrade orally administered levodopa (L-DOPA), providing a mechanistic explanation for the variability in treatment response in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Beyond PD, microbially mediated alterations in dopaminergic signaling have been implicated in mood disorders, neurodevelopmental conditions, metabolic dysfunction, and immune-mediated diseases. This review synthesizes current mechanistic and translational evidence on the dopamine–microbiota interface, outlines microbial pathways shaping dopaminergic activity, and highlights therapeutic opportunities including microbiota modulation, dietary strategies, fecal microbiota transplantation, and targeted inhibitors of microbial dopamine metabolism. Understanding this interface offers a foundation for developing personalized approaches in neurogastroenterology and neuromodulatory therapies.

One of the most complex and challenging developments at the beginning of the third millennium is the alarming increase in demographic aging, mainly—but not exclusively—affecting developed countries. This reality results in one of the harsh medical, social, and economic consequences: the continuously increasing number of people with dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which accounts for up to 80% of all such types of pathology. Its large and progressive disabling potential, which eventually leads to death, therefore represents an important public health matter, especially because there is no known cure for this disease. Consequently, periodic reappraisals of different therapeutic possibilities are necessary. For this purpose, we conducted this systematic literature review investigating nonpharmacological interventions for AD, including their currently known cellular and molecular action bases. This endeavor was based on the PRISMA method, by which we selected 116 eligible articles published during the last year. Because of the unfortunate lack of effective treatments for AD, it is necessary to enhance efforts toward identifying and improving various therapeutic and rehabilitative approaches, as well as related prophylactic measures.

Background: Sarcopenia, which has traditionally been considered to be an exclusively geriatric syndrome, has an increased frequency within the general population and fosters interest in its complex neuromuscular, cardiovascular, and metabolic basis. The current systematic review, adopting the recognized Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) methodology, seeks to highlight current evidence on the underlying mechanisms as well as approaches to sarcopenia diagnosis and management. Methods: A comprehensive search of major international databases identified studies published between January 2023 and December 2024, from which 42 articles were retained according to prespecified criteria. To further enrich the present work, eleven additional studies of high relevance were included. Results: The selected literature describes sarcopenia’s multifactorial pathophysiology, including mitochondrial dysfunction, neuromuscular junction (NMJ) degeneration, chronic inflammation, anabolic resistance, endocrine and metabolic dysregulation, altered motor-unit remodeling, and molecular alterations. Diagnostic methods focus on functional assessments, especially muscle strength and physical performance. In addition, imaging techniques and new circulating biomarkers enhance precision in specific situations. Over the years, rehabilitation has proven to be one of the most effective therapeutic approaches. Complementary strategies, ranging from nutritional optimization to pharmacologic modulation of the renin–angiotensin system, show promise in specific patient subsets. Discussion and Conclusions: As supported by the works collected within the current study, future approaches will need to consider sarcopenia as a multifactorial disease that goes beyond aging.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients face different health challenges when infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) than the general population, due to both their immunocompromised state and the immunosuppressive therapies they receive. This systematic literature review, which follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) paradigm, explores the interactions between RA and SARS-CoV-2 infection, focusing on immunologic issues, disease management, vaccination, and adverse outcomes. In order to obtain the most relevant information, we systematically reviewed the specific literature from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023, based on the PRISMA method, by which we eventually selected 35 eligible articles, to which we added other ISI-indexed studies to enrich our results further. Consequently, we performed a funnel analysis to evaluate the potential for publication bias. Firstly, the data collected revealed the impact of the pandemic on RA diagnoses and the fear of face-to-face medical consultations that delayed adequate treatment. Secondly, cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities increase the risk of prolonged COVID-19 symptoms, hospitalization, and severe COVID-19 outcomes for RA patients. With respect to immunosuppressive treatment used to control RA, it was observed that glucocorticoids (especially high-dose usage) and Rituximab (RTX) predispose the patients to poor SARS-CoV-2 outcomes, as opposed to Baricitinib and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. COVID-19 vaccination has proven effective and generally safe for RA patients in some studies, although therapies with Methotrexate (MTX), Abatacept (ABA), and RTX have been associated with impaired vaccine immune response. This systematic literature review brings updated and thorough information with respect to the immunological, clinical, and management of a complex immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) like RA in the setting of COVID-19 and underlines the challenges faced by this group of patients. The lessons learned can be extended beyond the pandemic in shaping a more informed and compassionate healthcare system and offering long-term medical care for patients with RA.

Spondyloarthritis refers to a broad group of conditions that include ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, and enteropathic arthritis associated with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. They have been classified by the ASAS group (ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis) into axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis. Common features include the absence of autoantibodies, genetic predisposition, and clinical aspects such as axial joint involvement, peripheral manifestations, and extra-articular involvement. However, the pathogenic mechanisms remain complex and incompletely elucidated, despite the fact that the specialized literature has described several pathways that act in synergy: genetic predisposition, environmental factors (infections and mechanical stress), or innate and acquired immune mechanisms. Finally, an inflammatory response is triggered by the recruitment of a large number of inflammatory cells and the release of innate cytokines in the affected areas: joints or periarticular or extraarticular tissues. The current article aims to update and systematize the knowledge accumulated so far on this topic, focusing on the mechanisms that have been involved in the onset, progression, and severity of ankylosing spondylitis.