Simona Isabelle Stoica

Dr. Simona Isabelle Stoica

UMF Carol Davila Bucharest

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJules J.M. Kraaijkamp
Jules J.M. Kraaijkamp
APAnke Persoon
Anke Persoon
SASorina Maria Aurelian
Sorina Maria Aurelian
Stefan BachmannStefan Bachmann
Stefan Bachmann
ICIan Cameron
Ian Cameron
EIEléonore F Van Dam Van Isselt
Eléonore F Van Dam Van Isselt
While eHealth can help improve outcomes for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation, the implementation and integration of eHealth is often complex and time-consuming. To use eHealth effectively in geriatric rehabilitation, it is essential to understand the experiences and needs of healthcare professionals. In this international multicentre cross-sectional study, we used a web-based survey to explore the use, benefits, feasibility and usability of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation settings, together with the needs of working healthcare professionals. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative findings. The survey was completed by 513 healthcare professionals from 16 countries. Over half had experience with eHealth, although very few (52 of 263 = 20%) integrated eHealth into daily practice. Important barriers to the use or implementation of eHealth included insufficient resources, lack of an organization-wide implementation strategy and lack of knowledge. Professionals felt that eHealth is more complex for patients than for themselves, and also expressed a need for reliable information concerning available eHealth interventions and their applications. While eHealth has clear benefits, important barriers hinder successful implementation and integration into healthcare. Tailored implementation strategies and reliable information on effective eHealth applications are needed to overcome these barriers.

18 February 2022 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simona Isabelle StoicaSimona Isabelle Stoica
Simona Isabelle Stoica
Coralia BleotuCoralia Bleotu
Coralia Bleotu
VCVlad Ciobanu
Vlad Ciobanu
AIAnca Mirela Ionescu
Anca Mirela Ionescu
IAIrina Albadi
Irina Albadi
Constantin MunteanuConstantin Munteanu
Constantin Munteanu
Hypoxia represents the temporary or longer-term decrease or deprivation of oxygen in organs, tissues, and cells after oxygen supply drops or its excessive consumption. Hypoxia can be (para)-physiological—adaptive—or pathological. Thereby, the mechanisms of hypoxia have many implications, such as in adaptive processes of normal cells, but to the survival of neoplastic ones, too. Ischemia differs from hypoxia as it means a transient or permanent interruption or reduction of the blood supply in a given region or tissue and consequently a poor provision with oxygen and energetic substratum-inflammation and oxidative stress damages generating factors. Considering the implications of hypoxia on nerve tissue cells that go through different ischemic processes, in this paper, we will detail the molecular mechanisms by which such structures feel and adapt to hypoxia. We will present the hypoxic mechanisms and changes in the CNS. Also, we aimed to evaluate acute, subacute, and chronic central nervous hypoxic-ischemic changes, hoping to understand better and systematize some neuro-muscular recovery methods necessary to regain individual independence. To establish the link between CNS hypoxia, ischemic-lesional mechanisms, and neuro-motor and related recovery, we performed a systematic literature review following the” Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA”) filtering method by interrogating five international medical renown databases, using, contextually, specific keywords combinations/”syntaxes”, with supplementation of the afferent documentation through an amount of freely discovered, also contributive, bibliographic resources. As a result, 45 papers were eligible according to the PRISMA-inspired selection approach, thus covering information on both: intimate/molecular path-physiological specific mechanisms and, respectively, consequent clinical conditions. Such a systematic process is meant to help us construct an article structure skeleton giving a primary objective input about the assembly of the literature background to be approached, summarised, and synthesized. The afferent contextual search (by keywords combination/syntaxes) we have fulfilled considerably reduced the number of obtained articles. We consider this systematic literature review is warranted as hypoxia’s mechanisms have opened new perspectives for understanding ischemic changes in the CNS neuraxis tissue/cells, starting at the intracellular level and continuing with experimental research to recover the consequent clinical-functional deficits better.

26 April 2022 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAurelian Anghelescu
Aurelian Anghelescu
GOGelu Onose
Gelu Onose
CPCristina Popescu
Cristina Popescu
MBMihai Băilă
Mihai Băilă
Simona Isabelle StoicaSimona Isabelle Stoica
Simona Isabelle Stoica
Constantin MunteanuConstantin Munteanu
Constantin Munteanu
Accumulating data suggest that chronic neuroinflammation-mediated neurodegeneration is a significant contributing factor for progressive neuronal and glial cell death in age-related neurodegenerative pathology. Furthermore, it could be encountered as long-term consequences in some viral infections, including post-COVID-19 Parkinsonism-related chronic sequelae. The current systematic review is focused on a recent question aroused during the pandemic’s successive waves: are there post-SARS-CoV-2 immune-mediated reactions responsible for promoting neurodegeneration? Does the host’s dysregulated immune counter-offensive contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, emerging as Parkinson’s disease, in a complex interrelation between genetic and epigenetic risk factors? A synthetic and systematic literature review was accomplished based on the ”Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Principles Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) methodology, including registration on the specific online platform: International prospective register of systematic reviews—PROSPERO, no. 312183. Initially, 1894 articles were detected. After fulfilling the five steps of the selection methodology, 104 papers were selected for this synthetic review. Documentation was enhanced with a supplementary 47 bibliographic resources identified in the literature within a non-standardized search connected to the subject. As a final step of the PRISMA method, we have fulfilled a Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Time (PICOT)/Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Study type (PICOS)—based metanalysis of clinical trials identified as connected to our search, targeting the outcomes of rehabilitative kinesitherapeutic interventions compared to clinical approaches lacking such kind of treatment. Accordingly, we identified 10 clinical trials related to our article. The multi/interdisciplinary conventional therapy of Parkinson’s disease and non-conventional multitarget approach to an integrative treatment was briefly analyzed. This article synthesizes the current findings on the pathogenic interference between the dysregulated complex mechanisms involved in aging, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration, focusing on Parkinson’s disease and the acute and chronic repercussions of COVID-19. Time will tell whether COVID-19 neuroinflammatory events could trigger long-term neurodegenerative effects and contribute to the worsening and/or explosion of new cases of PD. The extent of the interrelated neuropathogenic phenomenon remains obscure, so further clinical observations and prospective longitudinal cohort studies are needed.

14 July 2025 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAna Iulia Neagu
Ana Iulia Neagu
MBMarinela Bostan
Marinela Bostan
VIVlad Alexandru Ionescu
Vlad Alexandru Ionescu
GGGina Gheorghe
Gina Gheorghe
CHCamelia Mia Hotnog
Camelia Mia Hotnog
Coralia BleotuCoralia Bleotu
Coralia Bleotu
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a multifactorial disease increasingly recognized for its complex interplay with the gut microbiota. The disruption of microbial homeostasis—dysbiosis—has profound implications for intestinal barrier integrity and host immune function. Pathogenic bacterial species such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, Escherichia coli harboring polyketide synthase (pks) island, and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis are implicated in CRC through mechanisms involving mucosal inflammation, epithelial barrier disruption, and immune evasion. These pathogens promote pro-tumorigenic inflammation, enhance DNA damage, and suppress effective anti-tumor immunity. Conversely, commensal and probiotic bacteria, notably Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, exert protective effects by preserving epithelial barrier function and priming host immune responses. These beneficial microbes can promote the maturation of dendritic cells, stimulate CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity, and modulate regulatory T cell populations, thereby enhancing anti-tumor immunity. The dichotomous role of the microbiota underscores its potential as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target in CRC. Recent advances in studies have explored microbiota-modulating strategies—ranging from dietary interventions and prebiotics to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and microbial consortia—as adjuncts to conventional therapies. Moreover, the composition of the gut microbiome has been shown to influence the responses to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, raising the possibility of microbiome-informed precision oncology therapy. This review synthesizes the current findings on the pathogenic and protective roles of bacteria in CRC and evaluates the translational potential of microbiome-based interventions in shaping future therapeutic paradigms.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCristiana Aurelia Barbu
Cristiana Aurelia Barbu
SSSmaranda Stoleru
Smaranda Stoleru
AZAurelian Zugravu
Aurelian Zugravu
EPElena Poenaru
Elena Poenaru
ADAdrian Florentin Florentin Dragomir
Adrian Florentin Florentin Dragomir
FIFulga Ion
Fulga Ion
The microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) comprises a complex bidirectional communication network integrating neural, immune, metabolic, and endocrine pathways. Dopamine, traditionally viewed as a central neurotransmitter, also plays essential roles in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, where it regulates motility, secretion, barrier homeostasis, and mucosal immunity. Growing evidence indicates that the gut microbiota significantly contributes to intestinal dopamine metabolism through specialized enzymatic pathways, particularly tyrosine decarboxylase in Enterococcus species and catechol dehydroxylase in Eggerthella species. These microbial reactions compete with host processes, alter dopaminergic tone, and degrade orally administered levodopa (L-DOPA), providing a mechanistic explanation for the variability in treatment response in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Beyond PD, microbially mediated alterations in dopaminergic signaling have been implicated in mood disorders, neurodevelopmental conditions, metabolic dysfunction, and immune-mediated diseases. This review synthesizes current mechanistic and translational evidence on the dopamine–microbiota interface, outlines microbial pathways shaping dopaminergic activity, and highlights therapeutic opportunities including microbiota modulation, dietary strategies, fecal microbiota transplantation, and targeted inhibitors of microbial dopamine metabolism. Understanding this interface offers a foundation for developing personalized approaches in neurogastroenterology and neuromodulatory therapies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASorina Maria Aurelian
Sorina Maria Aurelian
Adela CiobanuAdela Ciobanu
Adela Ciobanu
RCRoxana Octavia Carare
Roxana Octavia Carare
Simona Isabelle StoicaSimona Isabelle Stoica
Simona Isabelle Stoica
AAAurelian Anghelescu
Aurelian Anghelescu
AZAndreea Zamfirescu
Andreea Zamfirescu
One of the most complex and challenging developments at the beginning of the third millennium is the alarming increase in demographic aging, mainly—but not exclusively—affecting developed countries. This reality results in one of the harsh medical, social, and economic consequences: the continuously increasing number of people with dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which accounts for up to 80% of all such types of pathology. Its large and progressive disabling potential, which eventually leads to death, therefore represents an important public health matter, especially because there is no known cure for this disease. Consequently, periodic reappraisals of different therapeutic possibilities are necessary. For this purpose, we conducted this systematic literature review investigating nonpharmacological interventions for AD, including their currently known cellular and molecular action bases. This endeavor was based on the PRISMA method, by which we selected 116 eligible articles published during the last year. Because of the unfortunate lack of effective treatments for AD, it is necessary to enhance efforts toward identifying and improving various therapeutic and rehabilitative approaches, as well as related prophylactic measures.