The fluorinated pyrimidine 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is an anticancer agent used in most adjuvant and palliative treatment regimens for colorectal cancer. Neurotoxicities are considered extremely rare side effects of 5-FU. Here, we report a case of 5-FU–induced encephalopathy, manifesting as seizures and delirium, in an era of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. If ammonia levels are elevated, lactulose may be considered in the initial management of neuropsychiatric complications from 5-FU.

Background: The safety impact of radiotherapy (RT) timing relative to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. We investigated if RT within 14 days (Interval 1) and 90 days (Interval 2) of ICI use is associated with toxicities compared to RT outside these intervals. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients treated with both RT and ICIs were reviewed. Toxicities were graded as per CTCAE v4.0 and attributed to either ICIs or RT by clinicians. Associations between RT timing and Grade ≥2 toxicities were analyzed using logistic regression models adjusted for patient, disease, and treatment factors (α = 0.05). Results: Sixty-four patients were identified. Twenty received RT within Interval 1 and 40 within Interval 2. There were 20 Grade ≥2 toxicities in 18 (28%) patients; pneumonitis (6) and nausea (2) were most prevalent. One treatment-related death (immune encephalitis) was observed. Rates of patients with Grade ≥2 toxicities were 35%/25% in the group with/without RT within Interval 1 and 30%/25% in the group with/without RT within Interval 2. No significant association between RT timing relative to ICI use period and Grade ≥2 toxicities was observed. Conclusion: Albeit limited by the small sample size, the result suggested that pausing ICIs around RT use may not be necessary.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can result in significant skin toxicities that may impact patients’ quality of life. While these skin reactions are well documented in patients with lighter skin, there is a paucity of literature and images to guide clinicians in their assessment in patients with darker skin tones. Given that dermatological reactions in patients with darker skin are not well represented, this can result in the undertreatment or mistreatment of these otherwise common toxicities. Herein, we present a case of a female patient with a darker skin tone with metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with EGFR-TKI-related skin toxicity and her clinical course.

Purpose. Consolidation with durvalumab is standard of care in the management of unresectable stage 3 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) postchemoradiation, and pneumonitis is an independent potential treatment complication of both treatment strategies. This study seeks to determine the timing of radiation pneumonitis (RP) by receipt of durvalumab. In addition, we reviewed the preventative strategies guided by pathophysiology of pneumonitis. Methods. We identified patients with unresectable Stage 3 NSCLC who developed grade ≥2 RP after chemoradiotherapy. Time-to-RP was defined from date of completion of radiotherapy to date of radiological diagnosis of RP and accompanying clinical symptoms. Early RP was defined as RP within 2 months of completion of radiotherapy. Differences in time-to-RP by receipt of durvalumab were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differences in those who had early vs late RP by receipt of durvalumab was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression was used to evaluate patient and treatment factors associated with early RP. Results. Of the 144 patients with Stage 3 NSCLC who had definitive chemoradiotherapy, 31 (22%) developed grade ≥2 RP and were included in the study. There was one patient with grade 5 RP. The median age of the cohort was 67 years (range 41–87). The mean lung dose, V5Gy, and V20Gy were 15.8Gy (SD = 1.56), 60.14% (SD 2.73), and 29.96% (SD 1.82), respectively. Twelve (39%) patients received durvalumab. The median time-to-RP was 3.4 months (range: 1.7–7.2) and 2.3 months (range: 0.6–9.6) in patients who had durvalumab and no durvalumab, respectively ( ). 83% (10/12) of patients who had durvalumab and 58% (11/19) of patients who did not have durvalumab had late RP ( ). No other patient and treatment factors were associated with early RP. Conclusion. Patients on durvalumab may have late-onset RP; therefore, further studies with larger cohort of patients and development of new predictive models that incorporate evolving management are needed should preventative strategies of RP be considered in routine clinical practice.