The disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) have been associated with Fibromyalgia (FM). However, there are no data about the relationship between FM and DGBI using Rome IV criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of FM in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and/or Functional Dyspepsia (FD) and the prevalence of IBS and FD in FM patients using Rome IV criteria. DGBI patients and FM patients were recruited from two outpatient clinics devoted to DGBI and FM. All patients underwent a standardized gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms questionnaire. FM symptoms in DGBI patients were assessed through Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Thereafter, the rheumatologists evaluated them. 49.0% of FM patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for IBS, 81.6% for FD with an overlap for both IBS/FD in 44.9%. IBS-C was the most prevalent IBS-subtype in DGBI patients, whereas IBS-M was the most prevalent in FM patients (p = 0.01). 45.3% of DGBI patients reported pathological FiRST scores. DGBI patients with FM showed the highest score at the standardized GI questionnaire followed by FM patients with DGBI and DGBI without FM. In conclusion DGBI are common in FM patients and vice versa. The presence of FD is extremely frequent in FM patients. A multidisciplinary approach should be routinely used for the management of these patients.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an interleukin-12/interleukin-23 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD). Only limited real-life data on the long-term outcomes of CD patients treated with UST are available. This study assessed UST’s long-term effectiveness and safety in a large population-based cohort of moderate to severe CD patients. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study that included both naïve and biologic-experienced patients treated with UST who achieved clinical remission or clinical response after at least one year of treatment. Clinical activity was scored according to the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI). The primary endpoints were the maintenance or achievement of clinical remission after a further 12-month period of treatment, defined as an HBI of ≤5, and safety. Other endpoints included steroid-free remission, mucosal healing (MH), steroid discontinuation, and the need for treatment optimization during the follow-up. Results: Out of 562 CD patients, after an overall 24-month follow-up, clinical remission was present in 450 (80.0%) patients, and at 12 months, clinical remission was observed in 417/437 (95.4%) patients; 33/125 (26.4%) showed clinical response at 12 months (p = 0.000). A total of 38/103 (36.9%) patients achieved MH. Only 2.1% (12/562), 3% (17/562), and 1.1% (6/562) of patients required surgery, optimization, and re-induction, respectively. Adverse events occurred in eight patients (1.42%). According to a multivariate analysis, the only predictor of long-term remission was the presence of remission at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.000). Conclusions: Long-term treatment with UST presents good efficacy and safety profiles in CD patients, especially for patients who achieve remission after one year.

Background: Risankizumab (RZB) is an anti-interleukin 23 (anti-IL-23) approved for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD). Study question: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RZB in the treatment of CD in real-world settings. Study design: We performed a retrospective review of a multicentre consortium of patients with CD treated with RZB. Measures and Outcomes: Coprimary outcomes were clinical remission at week 12, 24, and 52 (Harvey–Bradshaw Index score of ≤4), and safety. Secondary outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, and endoscopic remission at 52 weeks. Results: A total of 487 patients were included. The median follow-up was 24 (interquartile range: 16–38) weeks. A total of 372 (76.4%) patients achieved clinical remission at maximal follow-up. According to the treatment line in which RZB was administered, clinical remission occurred in 115/134 (85.8%) patients on second-line therapy, 112/153 (73.2%) on third-line therapy, and 145/200 (72.5%) on fourth-line therapy, with a significant difference ( P = 0.010). Adverse events occurred in 60 patients (12.6%) during follow-up; most of them were mild (50/60, 83.3%). Regarding the secondary outcomes: steroid-free clinical remission was achieved in 342 (71.8%) patients, and clinical response was observed in 443 (91.0%) patients. Six (1.2%) patients underwent surgery during follow-up. Mucosal healing was achieved in 34/67 (50.7%) patients. Conclusions: In this extensive, real-world study, RZB was effective and well tolerated in an advanced-therapy–exposed population of patients with CD and associated with favorable clinical and endoscopic outcomes.