Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits

Ms. Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 June 2015 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
MBMarco Blokland
Marco Blokland
KWKlaas L. Wubs
Klaas L. Wubs
MNMerel A. Nessen
Merel A. Nessen
LGLeen A. van Ginkel
Leen A. van Ginkel
MNMichel W. F. Nielen
Michel W. F. Nielen
The use of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) to enhance milk production is approved in several countries, but it is prohibited in the European Union. According to EU legislation, it is necessary to confirm positive screening results prior to enforcement. Although adequate screening assays are available nowadays, development of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) confirmatory methods to detect low levels of rbST is still a challenge. Here, we present a novel approach using immuno-affinity enrichment on monolithic micro-columns in combination with state-of-the-art ultra-high pressure LC-MS/MS (UHPLC-MS/MS) detection. The developed approach enables detection and confirmation of rbST in serum at a decision limit (CCα) concentration of 0.8 ng mL−1. Furthermore, the method is easy to handle, robust and reproducible. We successfully applied the confirmatory method to serum samples from rbST treated cows that were found suspect after immunoassay-based screening. The use of rbST could be confirmed over 1 week after treatment, and the developed method demonstrated the sensitivity needed for effective control.

20 December 2011 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSusann K.J. Ludwig
Susann K.J. Ludwig
NSNathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
MBMaria G.E.G. Bremer
Maria G.E.G. Bremer
MNMichel W.F. Nielen
Michel W.F. Nielen

20 September 2023 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
EDEmiliano De Dominicis
Emiliano De Dominicis
AKAndries J. Koops
Andries J. Koops
RKRian Kraan
Rian Kraan
SSSamim Saner
Samim Saner
EHElise Hoek-Van Den Hil
Elise Hoek-Van Den Hil
Consumption of low levels of egg already can evoke harmful physiological responses in humans in those allergic to eggs. By detection of egg in food products, using Egg ELISA kits to determine its unintended presence, food producers can respond to avoid potential safety or quality risks of their products. Selection of an ELISA kit fit for the issue at hand is challenging due to, amongst others, lack of information on assay performances with specified matrices. In this study, performances of seven commercial egg ELISA kits are compared for nine different relevant matrices: cookie, chocolate, pasta, dressing, stock cube, wine, vegetable drink and milk, ice cream and meat/meat replacers. The presence of egg was unified for all ELISA kits to mg total egg protein kg−1 food product. In every matrix, kit performances for recovery, intra- and interassay were compared, and also processing is accounted for by determination of egg in incurred samples. All seven kits were able to detect egg qualitatively at the VITAL3 ED01 level of 0.2 mg total egg protein and the corresponding relevant portion size for each matrix. For quantitative results, each ELISA kit showed an increase in detected egg concentration with increased egg levels and performed within the set criteria for recovery for the cookie, chocolate, stock cube and wine. For pasta, vegetable drink and milk, ice cream, and salad dressing, recovery of egg was within the set criteria for at least 4 ELISA kits. Most challenging matrices were meat/meat replacers, showing high matrix effects which could not be explained by the possible egg presence in the cognate blank. Only one ELISA kit was able to recover egg within the set criteria for the meat/meat replacer matrix. Results enable food industry to choose for ELISA kits suitable for egg detection in the matrix of interest.

17 May 2022 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAlexander Elferink
Alexander Elferink
DEDeborah Entiriwaa
Deborah Entiriwaa
PBPaolo Bulgarelli
Paolo Bulgarelli
NSNathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
JPJeroen Peters
Jeroen Peters
Processed milk and milk products produced from bovine milk, commonly contain β-casein A1 (βCA1) and β-casein A2 (βCA2). Since the presence of βCA1 is linked to milk intolerance and digestion problems, A2A2 milk, which only contains βCA2, is proposed as a healthier alternative. To support this health claim, the purity of A2A2-milk has to be guaranteed. In the presented study, a multiplex immunoassay, able to distinguish between βCA2 and βCA1, was developed and real-life applicability was shown on raw milk samples from genotyped A1A1, A1A2 and A2A2 cows. Because of its ability to discriminate between βCA2 and βCA1, this newly developed method was able to detect the addition of common bovine A1A2 milk to A2A2 milk, as low as 1%. Besides the detection of A2A2 milk purity, the developed assay can also be implemented as a rapid phenotyping method at dairy farms to replace the more invasive DNA-based screening. Additionally, the developed method was capable of detecting the addition of common bovine milk up to 1% in sheep, goat, buffalo, horse and donkey milk, which conforms to EU recommendations. In conclusion, a newly developed multiplex method capable of reliably detecting the dilution of A2A2 milk of multiple species, with common bovine milk up to 1%, is presented.

1 October 2011 in Drug Testing and Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
MBMaria Gabriëlle Eleonore Gerarda Bremer
Maria Gabriëlle Eleonore Gerarda Bremer
SLSusann Katrina Julie Ludwig
Susann Katrina Julie Ludwig
MNMichel W.F. Nielen
Michel W.F. Nielen
Administration of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) to enhance milk production in dairy cows is banned within the European Union. Therefore, methods for pinpointing rbST abuse are required. Due to the problematic detection of rbST itself in serum, methods are also focused on detecting changes in rbST‐related biomarkers. In this study, a fast and easy‐to‐perform microsphere‐based flow cytometric immunoassay (FCIA) for detection of rbST‐induced antibodies in serum was developed. Until now, detection of rbST‐induced antibodies was also problematic due to non‐specific binding of serum proteins resulting in a high rate of false positive results. Therefore, five different sample preparation methods, i.e. dilution, octanoic acid precipitation, filtration, protein G purification, and a previously described generic FCIA sample preparation were critically compared to overcome non‐specific binding to the microspheres. Only the generic FCIA sample pretreatment was effective in reducing non‐specific binding. As a result, an absolute decision level for detecting rbST antibodies in serum of dairy cows was determined and its applicability was demonstrated. In accordance with biological expectations from literature, rbST antibodies were induced in three out of four rbST‐treated dairy cows. These rbST‐induced antibodies were successfully detected for up to 4 weeks after the last rbST treatment, whereas no false positive results were obtained for 27 untreated dairy cows. This is the first method, able to overcome the interference of serum proteins and therefore, can be applied with high confidence for screening unknown herds of cattle for rbST antibodies, an important biomarker for pinpointing at rbST abuse in cattle. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

25 September 2024 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
Nathalie Gabrielle Esther Smits
NBNicolai Z. Ballin
Nicolai Z. Ballin
CBChristine Bruggeman
Christine Bruggeman
CFChristiane K. Fæste
Christiane K. Fæste
APAugusto A. Pastorelli
Augusto A. Pastorelli
AKAndries J. Koops
Andries J. Koops