Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common cancers in southern China and the first-line treatment is radiotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can deliver high dose to cancer and low dose to normal tissue, but xerostomia is still one of the complications after IMRT. However, how the concentration of saliva electrolytes be affected by IMRT and the effects on the quality of life are still unknown. In this prospective study, 76 NPC patients were recruited from hospitals in Hong Kong to identify the change of saliva electrolytes and xerostomia-related quality of life before and after IMRT. Saliva and questionnaire were collected before IMRT, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after IMRT. The concentration of saliva electrolytes was detected using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Saliva flow rate significantly decreased after IMRT. Decrease in the mean value of pH was observed but the difference is not statistically significant. The concentrations of potassium, iodine, and calcium decreased and chloride concentration increased after IMRT, while the concentrations of sodium, magnesium, copper or zinc were kept at the same level before and after treatment. Xerostomia-related quality of life was adversely affected by IMRT, but partially recovered after 1 year. Our study revealed the change of saliva electrolytes and xerostomia-related quality of life in patients undergone IMRT for NPC.

Purpose: To study the dynamic changes in plasma Epstein–Barr virus (pEBV) DNA after radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Experimental Design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with NPC who had detectable pEBV DNA at 6 weeks post-radiotherapy. Randomized patients had a second pEBV DNA checked at 6 months post-randomization. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: We prospectively enrolled 789 patients. Baseline post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) patients, and detectable in 216 (27.4%) patients, of whom 104 (13.2%) patients were eligible for randomization to adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 52) versus observation (n = 52). The first post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA had a sensitivity of 0.48, specificity of 0.81, area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.65, false positive (FP) rate of 13.8%, and false negative (FN) rate of 14.4% for disease progression. The second post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA had improved sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.75, AUC of 0.78, FP rate of 14.3%, and FN rate of 8.1%. Patients with complete clearance of post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA (51%) had survival superior to that of patients without post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA clearance (5-year PFS, 85.5% vs. 23.3%; HR, 9.6; P < 0.0001), comparable with patients with initially undetectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA (5-year PFS, 77.1%), irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Conclusions: Patients with NPC with detectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA who experienced subsequent pEBV DNA clearance had superior survival comparable with patients with initially undetectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA. Post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA clearance may serve as an early surrogate endpoint for long-term survival in NPC.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a unique head and neck cancer, where the endemic subtype is strongly associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, whereas emerging data suggest that a subset of nonendemic NPC may be associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Nonetheless, treatment advances have been driven by clinical trials conducted in endemic NPC, investigating optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced disease. The preference for induction chemotherapy (IC) in these patients has also led to evolution in the concept of radiotherapy target delineation. Because of its association with EBV, plasma EBV DNA is an archetypal biomarker for endemic NPC, and it is being explored for precise stratification and treatment individualization in several ongoing trials. In the space of recurrent or metastatic-NPC, with the advent of platinum-doublet chemotherapy and anti–PD-1 antibody as the new standard of care, several trials are investigating new immunotherapeutic combinations, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates that have demonstrated promise in early phase trials. An important advance for NPC in 2025 is the update of the 9th version of the TNM staging system, which has introduced several key changes, including downgrading of the TNM stage groupings for localized disease, and splitting of metastatic NPC into IVA and IVB based on the number of metastatic lesions. These revisions would have implications for the treatment and design of future trials. These advances are also relevant to nonendemic NPC, where evidence is inconclusive whether this disease responds differently to current treatments compared with endemic NPC.

The present study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in different lines of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment in a real-world setting. The clinical records of patients with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide between August 2015 and October 2017 were retrieved from all 7 public oncology centers in Hong Kong and reviewed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in first (1L), second (2L), and third or fourth lines (3L or 4L) of CRPC treatment. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and tolerance. Among a total of 117 patients (median age of 73 years [range, 52-90 years]), 34 (29.1%), 57 (48.7%), and 26 (19.3%) patients had enzalutamide as their 1L (chemo-naive), 2L (post-docetaxel or -abiraterone), and 3L or above treatment options. The overall PSA response rates were 43.6%, and were 73.5%, 35.1%, and 19.2% for 1L, 2L, and 3L or 4L treatment, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly associated with the line of treatment in the univariate survival analysis (1L/2L/3L and 4L; PFS, 7.1/3.9/2.2 months; OS, not reached/15.8/7.4 months; both P = .0002) but not in the multivariate analysis. The observed incidence of any fatigue (grade 1 or 2, 54.7%; grade 3 or 4, 9.4%) was much higher than reported in the AFFIRM (A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the Investigational Drug MDV3100 [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974311]) (any grade, 34%) and PREVAIL (A Multinational Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Of Oral Mdv3100 In Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Progressive Metastatic Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974311]) (any grade, 36%) trials; as well, grade ≥ 2 fatigue was significantly associated with 3L or 4L treatment (P = .01 in both univariate and multivariate analyses). In the real-life setting, there was a higher incidence of enzalutamide-related fatigue than reported in the trials. Earlier lines of enzalutamide treatment were associated with longer PFS and OS, more frequent PSA response, and less fatigue.