Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) increase the risk of thromboembolism. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of left atrial thrombus (LAT) in AF/AFl in relation to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Methods: LATTEE (NCT03591627) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with AF/AFl referred for transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion or ablation. Results: Of 3109 patients enrolled, 88% were on chronic, 1.5% on transient OAC and 10% without OAC. Of patients on chronic OAC, 39% received rivaroxaban, 30% dabigatran, 14% apixaban and 18% vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Patients on apixaban were oldest, had the worst renal function and were highest in both bleeding and thromboembolic risk, and more often received reduced doses. Prevalence of LAT was 8.0% (7.3% on chronic OAC vs. 15% without OAC; p < 0.01). In patients on VKA, prevalence of LAT was doubled compared to patients on non-VKA-OACs (NOACs) (13% vs. 6.0%; p < 0.01), even after propensity score weighting (13% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.01). Prevalence of LAT in patients on apixaban was higher (9.8%) than in those on rivaroxaban (5.7%) and dabigatran (4.7%; p < 0.01 for both comparisons), however, not after propensity score weighting. Conclusions: The prevalence of LAT in AF is non-negligible even on chronic OAC. The risk of LAT seems higher on VKA compared to NOAC, and similar between different NOACs.

Aim of the study: The aim of our review is to indicate and discuss the impact of cardiovascular risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes, lipid profile, hypertension and smoking on the course and mortality of COVID-19 infection. Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is spreading around the world and becoming a major public health crisis. All coronaviruses are known to affect the cardiovascular system. There is a strong correlation between cardiovascular risk factors and severe clinical complications, including death in COVID-19 patients. All the above-mentioned risk factors are widespread and constitute a significant worldwide health problem. Some of them are modifiable and the awareness of their connection with the COVID-19 progress may have a crucial impact on the current and possible upcoming infection. Data collection: We searched for research papers describing the impact of selected cardiovascular risk factors on the course, severity, complications and mortality of COVID-19 infection form PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Using terms, for example: “COVID-19 cardiovascular disease mortality”, “COVID-19 hypertension/diabetes mellitus/obesity/dyslipidemia”, “cardiovascular risk factors COVID-19 mortality” and other related terms listed in each subtitle. The publications were selected according to the time of their publications between January 2020 and December 2021. From the PubMed database we obtain 1552 results. Further studies were sought by manually searching reference lists of the relevant articles. Relevant articles were selected based on their title, abstract or full text. Articles were excluded if they were clearly related to another subject matter or were not published in English. The types of articles are mainly randomized controlled trial and systematic review. An additional criterion used by researchers was co-morbidities and age of patients in study groups. From a review of the publications, 105 of them were selected for this work with all subheadings included. Findings and Results: The intention of this review was to summarize current knowledge about comorbidities and development of COVID-19 infection. We tried to focus on the course and mortality of the abovementioned virus disease in patients with concomitant CV risk factors. Unfortunately, we were unable to assess the quality of data in screened papers and studies we choose because of the heterogenicity of the groups. The conducted studies had different endpoints and included different groups of patients in terms of nationality, age, race and clinical status. We decide to divide the main subjects of the research into separately described subtitles such as obesity, lipid profile, hypertension, diabetes, smoking. We believe that the studies we included and gathered are very interesting and show modern and present-day clinical data and approaches to COVID-19 infection in specific divisions of patients.

An increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and a higher risk of thromboembolic complications in AF patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of BMI on the risk of left atrial thrombi (LATs) in patients with nonvalvular AF/atrial flutter (AFl) (NV AF/AFl). Patients diagnosed with NVAF/AFl (between November 2018 and May 2020) were selected from the multicenter, prospective, observational Left Atrial Thrombus on Transesophageal Echocardiography (LATTEE) registry that included AF/AFl patients referred for cardioversion or ablation followed by transesophageal echocardiography. A total of 2816 AF/AFl patients (63.6% males; mean age 65.8 years; mean BMI 29.8 kg/m²) were included in the study. Two hundred and twenty-two of them (7.9%) had LATs. Compared with normal-weight patients, those with BMIs ≥ 25 kg/m² more frequently presented clinical factors potentially provoking LATs, such as non-paroxysmal AF/AFl (p = 0.04), hypertension (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001); had higher CHA₂DS₂ scores (p < 0.001); and had larger LA dimensions (LA diameter and LA area) (p < 0.001 for both parameters). On the other hand, they showed some features negatively related to thromboembolic risk; for example, they were younger (p < 0.001) and were more often male (p = 0.002). In addition, patients with abnormal BMIs were more likely to be smokers (p = 0.006) and to be treated with oral anticoagulants (p = 0.005). Despite these differences in the prevalence of thromboembolic risk factors, the incidence of LATs was not increased in patients with abnormal body weight (overweight and obese compared to normal-weight patients) in this large real-life cohort of AF/AFl patients. This is probably due to the balanced composition regarding the prevalence of positive and negative thromboembolic risk factors.

Background: Prolongation of the QT interval is directly related to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Age, comorbidities, and treatment schemes have been shown to influence its prolongation and may also significantly affect the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fluoroquinolones, widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic, are known for their ability to prolong the QT interval. Risk of ventricular arrhythmias has also been reported in patients with infectious diseases, and this risk may have been associated with high levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of levofloxacin on the corrected QT interval in patients with COVID-19, as well as to identify sociodemographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters associated with QTc interval prolongation among patients with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: The medical records of 93 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed, focusing on the presence of comorbidities and treatment with levofloxacin. Selected sociodemographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters were then statistically analyzed, with emphasis on their effect on the corrected QTc interval. The QTc interval was calculated according to the Bazett formula. Results: Levofloxacin use was not significantly associated with QTc interval. Statistical analysis identified creatinine, heart failure and atrial fibrillation as significant predictors of QTc interval prolongation. The trends towards QTc interval prolongation observed with hypokalaemia and hypertension suggest that these factors may also contribute to QTc interval variability and should be taken into account when assessing arrhythmia risk. Conclusions: Our retrospective study indicates that QTc prolongation results from the interplay of multiple factors.

Despite the availability of numerous lipid-lowering agents, the treatment of lipid disorders remains a public health challenge. A substantial portion of patients, especially those with severe dyslipidemia or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), fail to achieve the LDL-C goal. The leading causes of suboptimal LDL-C control include underprescription and poor adherence; however, in rare cases, it may result from an unusual biological response to treatment. In the presented case, a 78-year-old female with a history of transient ischemic attack and myocardial infarction was diagnosed with a heterozygous variant of FH and true statin intolerance following trials of simvastatin, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin. Initially, inclisiran was added to ezetimibe, leading to an unexpected increase in LDL-C. Due to the patient’s refusal of another statin re-challenge and the unavailability of bempedoic acid, nutraceuticals were introduced. After 6 months, inclisiran was discontinued because only a 22% reduction in LDL-C was achieved, likely attributable to the nutraceutical’s effect. Another PCSK9 inhibitor, evolocumab, was subsequently initiated. Shortly after the treatment onset, the patient complained of paraesthesia in the upper extremities and discontinued therapy. LDL-C levels increased by 7% after one month of treatment with evolocumab. The patient refused treatment with lipid apheresis. Possible causes of poor response to PCSK9 inhibitors include elevated lipoprotein(a) and FH.