Background/Objectives: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. The preventive efforts to reduce the burden are crucial. Primary causes of cardiovascular diseases include lipid disorders. The variety of available medications influences cardiovascular risk and allows for improvement. However, discontinuation or infrequent initiation of lipid-lowering therapies remains a problem. This study aimed to investigate predictors of lipid-lowering therapy escalation. Methods: 431 patients with known concentrations of Lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) acquired as part of routine cardiovascular risk assessment from the HELPE-R registry, hospitalised in the University Clinical Hospital in Białystok were included in this study. Escalation of treatment was defined as the initiation of any form of lowering therapy or an increase in the potency or dose of statins. The analysis of the influence of various factors on the decision about escalation was performed. Results: The median age was 69.00 years. The escalation of therapy occurred in 48.49% of patients. Not reaching the LDL-C goal was the strongest predictor of escalation (OR: 9.177). The other factors increasing the probability of escalation included acute coronary syndrome (OR: 3.913), prediabetes (OR: 2.372), chronic coronary syndrome (OR: 2.217), dyslipidemia (OR: 2.354), hypertension (OR: 1.734), carotid artery stenosis (OR: 1.625), and obesity (OR: 1.543). There was no effect of past MI and stroke on the escalation of lipid profile. Lp (a) did not affect the escalation. Conclusions: The decision about escalation of lipid-lowering therapy is mainly influenced by classical risk factors and established atherosclerotic disease. Lp (a) did not affect the escalation, despite growing interest among medical practitioners.

Despite the availability of numerous lipid-lowering agents, the treatment of lipid disorders remains a public health challenge. A substantial portion of patients, especially those with severe dyslipidemia or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), fail to achieve the LDL-C goal. The leading causes of suboptimal LDL-C control include underprescription and poor adherence; however, in rare cases, it may result from an unusual biological response to treatment. In the presented case, a 78-year-old female with a history of transient ischemic attack and myocardial infarction was diagnosed with a heterozygous variant of FH and true statin intolerance following trials of simvastatin, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin. Initially, inclisiran was added to ezetimibe, leading to an unexpected increase in LDL-C. Due to the patient’s refusal of another statin re-challenge and the unavailability of bempedoic acid, nutraceuticals were introduced. After 6 months, inclisiran was discontinued because only a 22% reduction in LDL-C was achieved, likely attributable to the nutraceutical’s effect. Another PCSK9 inhibitor, evolocumab, was subsequently initiated. Shortly after the treatment onset, the patient complained of paraesthesia in the upper extremities and discontinued therapy. LDL-C levels increased by 7% after one month of treatment with evolocumab. The patient refused treatment with lipid apheresis. Possible causes of poor response to PCSK9 inhibitors include elevated lipoprotein(a) and FH.

Background/Objectives: Stroke and arteriosclerotic diseases remain the main challenge for global healthcare. Carotid artery procedures aim to restore blood flow through the carotid arteries to prevent embolic events. The most common techniques include carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). The choice of intervention depends on the severity of stenosis, the patient’s overall condition and the presence of comorbidities. The personalized approach, which includes sex-related differences, is crucial in optimizing the outcome. Methods: Sex-related differences in atherosclerosis risk factors and early carotid artery stenting treatment outcomes were evaluated in 271 patients. The goal of the study was to asses sex-related differences in early outcome of CAS, including success rate and complications. Results: The only significant difference in classical arteriosclerosis risk factors included a higher occurrence of smoking among males. The technical success rate of carotid artery stenting was high (94.46%). The sex-related differences in CAS involve using smaller sizes of implanted stents in females. There was a high incidence of complications (mostly minor), predominantly among females. They had a significantly higher frequency of bleeding and hypotension. Blood pressure and BMI significantly influenced the odds of complications. Conclusions: Females undergoing CAS have a higher complication risk with a similar success rate.