Yang EJ, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Mar;35:e75. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e75

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and oncologic outcomes of patients with multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMT) with gynecologic cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 1929 patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer at a tertiary medical center between August 2005 and April 2021. The clinical data included cancer location, age at primary malignancy diagnosis, interval between primary and secondary cancer, stage of cancer, family history of cancer, genetic testing, dates of last follow-up, recurrence, and death. Results: The prevalence of MPMT with gynecologic cancer in patients was 8.6% and the mean diagnostic period between primary and secondary cancer was 60 months. Furthermore, 20 of the 165 patients with MPMT had multiple primary gynecologic cancers (MPGC), whereas 145 had gynecologic cancer coexisting with non-gynecologic cancer (GNC). Endometrial-ovarian cancer (60%) was the most common coexisting cancer in the MPGC group, whereas the most common non-gynecologic cancer in the GNC group was breast cancer (34.5%). There were 48 patients with synchronous cancer and 117 patients with metachronous cancer. The incidence of synchronous cancer was higher in the MPGC group than in the GNC group (p = 0.037). Significantly more patients had early-stage ovarian cancer in the MPGC group than in the GNC group (p = 0.031). The overall recurrence and mortality rates were 15.8% and 8.5%, respectively, in patients with MPMT. Conclusion: Synchronous cancer incidence was significantly higher in the MPGC than in the GNC group. Early-stage ovarian cancer was more highly diagnosed in patients with MPGC than in those with GNC. A systematic examination after primary cancer diagnosis could facilitate the early diagnosis of secondary primary malignancy, thereby improving patient prognosis.

Yang EJ, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 May;34:e63. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e63

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the protein overexpression and gene amplification of HER2 in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and to evaluate its role as a prognostic factor in Korean women. Methods: A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed from samples from 191 patients with diverse histologic types of EC. HER2 protein expression and gene amplification status were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in situ hybridization (SISH), respectively. All patients were treated and followed up at a single tertiary medical center in Seoul, Korea, between July 2009 and October 2020. Results: In terms of histological type, among the 191 EC patients, 157 had endometrioid carcinoma, nine had uterine serous papillary carcinoma (USPC), one had clear cell carcinoma, one had squamous cell carcinoma, eight had mixed carcinoma, and 15 had uterine carcinosarcoma (UC). HER2 protein overexpression was observed in eight of the 191 (4.2%) EC patients; of these patients, five had IHC scores of 2+, and three had IHC scores of 3+. The HER2 overexpression rates of USPC, UC, and endometrioid carcinomas were 33.3%, 26.6%, and 0.6%, respectively. HER2 protein overexpression was significant in USPC and UC tissues (p < 0.000) and was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). HER2 gene amplification was confirmed in seven of 184 patients (3.8%), including three patients with USPC and four patients with UC. OS was significantly shorter in patients who had HER2 amplification (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, HER2 expression and HER2 amplification were statistically significantly associated with worse OS (p = 0.006). However, HER2 expression without amplification was not statistically associated with OS (p = 0.993). Conclusions: HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification are significantly correlated with shorter OS in Korean women. HER2 can be considered an important predictor of survival outcomes in EC patients.

This study aimed to determine whether endocervical glandular involvement (GI) affects the clinical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III who underwent the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). This retrospective study included 250 patients who underwent LEEP for the treatment of CIN III between August 2005 and May 2020. The medical records of 234 patients were analyzed; 137 (58.5%) patients were GI negative, and 97 (41.5%) were GI positive. Margin involvement of the LEEP specimen was found in 59 (45.4%) patients in the GI-negative group and 54 (58.7%) patients in the GI-positive group (p = 0.051). The additional surgical procedures (repeat conization or hysterectomy) were significantly more performed in GI-positive patients than in GI-negative patients (40.9% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.004). When comparing the LEEP specimens of GI-1 (GI-positive confirmed via cervical biopsy before conization) and GI-2 (GI-positive confirmed via conization), we found that the mean depth was significantly greater in the GI-1 group (10.9 mm) than in the GI-2 group (7.6 mm) (p = 0.024). Surgical margin involvement was more frequently observed in the GI-2 group than in the GI-1 group (p = 0.030). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rates of CIN between the GI-negative and GI-positive groups (p = 0.641). In conclusion, despite no significant differences in residual disease and CIN recurrence between the GI-negative and GI-positive groups, additional surgical treatments were more frequently performed in GI-positive patients. Repeat surgery based on GI positivity should be carefully considered to avoid overtreatment and surgical complications.