ROAF AHMAD PARRAY

Dr. ROAF AHMAD PARRAY

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHasan Mirzakhaninafchi
Hasan Mirzakhaninafchi
IMIndra Mani
Indra Mani
MHMurtaza Hasan
Murtaza Hasan
Ali Mirzakhani NafchiAli Mirzakhani Nafchi
Ali Mirzakhani Nafchi
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY
DKDinesh Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
A study was conducted with the goal of developing an algorithm for use in sensors to monitor available soil N. For this purpose, three different soils were selected. The soils were studied for electrical conductivity (EC) at four different moisture levels and four levels of N. The selection of moisture levels was based on optimum moisture levels between tillage moisture and field capacity. The results revealed a significant relationship between electrical conductivity and moisture level of the soil as well as between electrical conductivity and soil N content. Based on these relations, a polynomial model was developed between the EC of each selected soil sample and moisture content as well as N levels. The regression model for moisture content-based EC determination had coefficients of determination of 0.985, 0.988, and 0.981 for clay loam, sandy loam, and sandy loam soils, respectively. Similarly, the regression model for N content-based EC determination had coefficients of determination of 0.9832, 0.9, and 0.99 for clay loam, sandy loam, and sandy loam soils, respectively. An algorithm developed using a polynomial relationship between the EC of each selected soil sample at all moisture and N levels can be used to develop a sensor for site-specific N application.

15 July 2024 in Journal of Field Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKarishma Kumari
Karishma Kumari
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY
YBY. B. Basavaraj
Y. B. Basavaraj
SGSamarth Godara
Samarth Godara
IMIndra Mani
Indra Mani
HMHasan Mirzakhaninafchi
Hasan Mirzakhaninafchi

24 April 2025 in Fungal Genetics and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTushar Dhar
Tushar Dhar
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY
BBBishnu Maya Bashyal
Bishnu Maya Bashyal
ASAwani Kumar Singh
Awani Kumar Singh
PDParveen Dhanger
Parveen Dhanger
YEYeasin
Yeasin

6 January 2022 in ACS Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY
TBTarun Kumar Bhattacharya
Tarun Kumar Bhattacharya
A study was conducted to evaluate ethyl acetate, soy biodiesel, and 1-octanol as surfactants for stabilization of ethanol–diesel fuel blends. The evaluation was based on the temperature stability and engine performance of ethanol–diesel fuel blends stabilized by selected surfactants. Among the three selected surfactants, 1-octanol was most effective in stabilizing ethanol–diesel fuel blends. Out of 20 ethanol–diesel fuel blends prepared with 1-octanol as surfactant, only 3 blends showed distinct phase separation; the rest 17 remained stable in the entire temperature range of 0–45 °C. At the rated engine speed, eight ethanol–diesel fuel blends showed similar power-producing capability as that of diesel. The engine running on diesel developed a power of 3.71 kW, while the engine brake power with ethanol–diesel fuel blends was in the range of 3.67–3.74 kW at the rated load condition. The tested fuel blends resulted in slightly higher fuel consumption and increased emission of unburnt hydrocarbons as compared to the diesel fuel. The tested fuel blends had comparable thermal efficiency and acceptable UBHC and NOx emissions compared to diesel.

15 March 2024 in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MCManojit Chowdhury
Manojit Chowdhury
TKTapan Kumar Khura
Tapan Kumar Khura
PUPravin Kumar Upadhyay
Pravin Kumar Upadhyay
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY
HKH. L. Kushwaha
H. L. Kushwaha
IMIndra Mani
Indra Mani
Nitrogen responses vary under diverse agronomic management practices, influencing vegetation indices (VIs) and productivity across different ecological conditions. However, the proper quantification of these responses under various crop establishment methods with varied nitrogen levels is rarely studied. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of varying nitrogen levels on VIs, growth parameters, yield attributes, yield, and economic aspects of transplanted rice (TR) and direct-seeded rice (DSR). The experiment was conducted in the randomized block design consisted seven N levels, which included 0% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) or no nitrogen (N0), 33.33% RDN (N1), 66.66% RDN (N2), 100% RDN (N3), 133.33% RDN (N4), 166.66% RDN (N5) and 200% RDN (N6), and replicated thrice. The plots with higher N levels demonstrated increased values of VIs and treatment N3 (120 kg N ha−1), N4 (160 kg N ha−1), N5 (200 kg N ha−1), and N6 (240 kg N ha−1) showed no statistically significant differences in NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index), RVI (ratio vegetation index), NDRE (normalized difference red edge), and GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index) values across the various growth stages of rice. The application of treatment N4 resulted in the highest number of panicles m−2 (348.2 in TR, 376.8 in DSR), filled grains panicle−1 (74.55 in TR, 62.43 in DSR), and a 1,000-grain weight of 26.92 g in TR and 26.76 g in DSR. The maximum yield (4.89 t ha−1) was obtained in transplanted rice at treatment N4 and, 8.15% yield reduction was noted in DSR for the same treatment, which was statistically equivalent to N3, but significantly superior to other N levels. Conversely, in DSR with RDN (120 kg N ha−1), the cost–benefit ratio surpassed that of TR by 16.96%, signifying DSR’s adaptability for more profitable rice cultivation in the region. This research provides valuable insights into optimizing nitrogen management practices for TR and DSR, thereby enhancing rice crop performance and economic returns.

11 May 2024 in Journal of Stored Products Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAbhinav Dubey
Abhinav Dubey
IMIndra Mani
Indra Mani
WRWinny Routray
Winny Routray
SNS.M. Nebapure
S.M. Nebapure
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY