Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast has been increasingly used for the detailed evaluation of breast lesions. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) gives additional information for the lesions based on tissue cellularity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the possibilities of DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC ratio (the ratio between the ADC of the lesion and the ADC of normal glandular tissue) to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and methods: Eighty-seven patients with solid breast lesions (52 malignant and 35 benign) were examined on a 1.5 T MR scanner before histopathological evaluation. ADC values and ADC ratios were calculated. Results: The ADC values in the group with malignant tumors were significantly lower (mean 0.88 ± 0.15 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) in comparison with the group with benign lesions (mean 1.52 ± 0.23 × 10⁻³ mm²/s). A significantly lower ADC ratio was observed in the patients with malignant tumors (mean 0.66 ± 0.13) versus the patients with benign lesions (mean 1.12 ± 0.23). The cut-off point of the ADC value for differentiating malignant from benign breast tumors was 1.11 × 10⁻³ mm²/s with a sensitivity of 94.23%, specificity of 94.29%, and diagnostic accuracy of 98%, and an ADC ratio of ≤0.87 with a sensitivity of 94.23%, specificity of 91.43%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 95%. Conclusion: According to the results from our study DWI, ADC values and ADC ratio proved to be valuable additional techniques with high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions.

Background and objectives: Although minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) has demonstrated its efficacy, complete stone clearance was not always achieved, necessitating a second procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with residual stone rate, operative duration, complications, and hospital stay, in order to develop algorithms for pre-operative prognosis and planning. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved 163 Bulgarian patients who underwent MPCNL with Holmium: YAG lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stones. Patients were considered stone-free if no visible fragments (<3 mm) were found on nephroscopy at the end of the procedure, as well as on postoperative X-ray and abdominal ultrasound on the first postoperative day. Results: Immediate postoperative stone-free outcome was attained for 83.43% of the patients (136/163). Residuals were associated with staghorn stones (OR = 72.48, 95% CI: 5.76 to 91.81); stones in two locations (OR = 21.91, 95% CI: 4.15 to 137.56); larger stone size (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.006 to 1.25); and higher density (OR = 1.03, 95% CI:1.005 to 1.06). The overall categorization accuracy for these factors was 93.80%, AUC = 0.971 (95% CI: 0.932 to 0.991), 89.71% sensitivity, and 96.30% specificity. Predictors of prolonged operative duration were staghorn stones and volume, R-square (adj.) = 39.00%, p < 0.001. Longer hospitalization was predicted for patients with hydronephrosis and staghorn stones, R-square (adj.) = 6.82%, p = 0.003. Post-operative complications were rare, predominantly of Clavien-Dindo Grade 1, and were more frequent in patients with hydronephrosis. We did not find a link between their occurrence and the outcome of MPCNL. Conclusions: Staghorn stones and stones in more than one location showed the strongest association with residual stone rate. Staghorn stones and larger volume were linked with a longer operative duration. Hydronephrosis increased the risk of complications and longer hospitalization.

The development of the Gleason grading system has proven to be an irreplaceable tool in prostate cancer diagnostics within urology. Despite the advancements and developments in diagnostics, there remains a discrepancy in the grading process among even the most experienced pathologists. AI algorithms have demonstrated potential in detecting cancer and assigning Gleason grades, offering a solution to the issue of significant variability among pathologists’ evaluations. Our paper explores the evolving role of AI in prostate cancer histopathology, with a key focus on outcomes and the reliability of various AI algorithms for Gleason pattern assessment. We conducted a non-systematic review of the published literature to examine the role of artificial intelligence in Gleason pattern diagnostics. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to gather pertinent information about recent advancements in artificial intelligence and their impact on Gleason patterns. We found that AI algorithms are increasingly being used to identify Gleason patterns in prostate cancer, with recent studies showing promising advancements that surpass traditional diagnostic methods. These findings highlight AI’s potential to be integrated into clinical practice, enhancing pathologists’ workflows and improving patient outcomes. The inter-observer variability in Gleason grading has seen an improvement in efficiency with the implementation of AI. Pathologists using AI have reported successful outcomes, demonstrating its effectiveness as a supplementary tool. While some refinements are still needed before AI can be fully implemented in clinical practice, its positive impact is anticipated soon.

Introduction: A variety of imaging techniques exists for the diagnosis of pancreatic disorders. None of the broadly applied diagnostic methods utilizes elasticity as an indicator of tissue damage. A well-known fact is that both chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) are associated with the development of prominent fibrosis (increased tissue stiffness). Purpose: To prospectively assess the accuracy of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) in differentiating between benign and malignant pancreatic diseases, establish a cut-off value for the diagnosis of PDA, and evaluate the influence of certain variables on the obtained results. Materials and methods: The present study included 78 patients who were admitted at the Department of Gastroenterology at the university hospital “Kaspela” between December 2017 and August 2021 for diagnosis and/or treatment of pancreatic disorders. Based on the clinical criteria, diagnostic imaging, and histological findings, patients were divided into the CP and PDA group. The ultrasound based pSWE technique was applied and shear wave velocity (SWV) was measured. The depth of region of interest (ROI) and successful measurement rate were also recorded. Results: The mean ± SD SWV values established through pSWE were 1.75 ± 0.34 m/s and 2.93 ± 0.91 m/s for the CP and PDA, respectively. With a cut-off value of 2.09 m/s, we calculated the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and accuracy for differentiating between CP and PDA of 89.47%, 91.20%, and 88.60%, respectively. Of the examined variables, BMI and depth of ROI in the CP group and sex in the PDA group showed a statistically significant influence on the obtained results. Conclusions: pSWE may be utilized as a differential diagnostic modality in patients with suspected CP or PDA.

Portal hypertension (PH) and esophageal varices (EVs) are a matter of extensive research. According to current Baveno VII guidelines, in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD), liver stiffness measurement (LSM) < 15 kPa and PLT count > 150 × 10⁹/L, upper endoscopy (UE) is not mandatory, and the emphasis should be set on non-invasive methods for evaluation of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). The aim of this study is to establish whether liver stiffness (LS) measured by 2D-SWE could be used as a predictor for the presence and severity of EVs in cirrhotic patients. In total, 86 patients of whom 32 with compensated liver cirrhosis (cLC) and 54 with decompensated liver cirrhosis (dLC) were examined in the Gastroenterology clinic of University hospital “Kaspela”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Each patient underwent LS assessment by 2D-SWE and EVs grading by UE. EVs were detected in 47 (54.7%) patients, 23 (49%) of them were stage 4-high-risk EVs (HREV). The cut-off value for LS that differentiates HREV from the rest was set at 2.49 m/s with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity (AUC 1.000, CI 0.925). Conclusions: 2D-SWE can be used as a non-invasive method in the assessment of only high-grade esophageal varices. For the other grades, upper endoscopy remains the method of choice.