Optimizing the anticoagulation therapy is of pivotal importance in patients with a malignant tumor, as venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become the second-leading cause of death in this population. Cancer can highly increase the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Consequently, the management of cancer-associated VTE is complex. In recent years, translational research has intensified, and several studies have highlighted the role of inflammatory cytokines in cancer growth and progression. Simultaneously, the pleiotropic effects of anticoagulants currently recommended for VTE have emerged. In this review, we describe the anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects of both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LWMHs).

Cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a complex interplay between cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and metabolic disorders, significantly impacting cancer patients. The presence of CKM syndrome in cancer patients not only worsens their prognosis but also increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), reduces quality of life (QoL), and affects overall survival (OS). Furthermore, several anticancer therapies, including anthracyclines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and hormonal treatments, can exacerbate CKM syndrome by inducing cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and metabolic dysregulation. This review explores the pathophysiology of CKM syndrome in cancer patients and highlights emerging therapeutic strategies to mitigate its impact. We discuss the role of novel pharmacological interventions, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), and soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activators, as well as dietary and lifestyle interventions. Optimizing the management of CKM syndrome in cancer patients is crucial to improving OS, enhancing QoL, and reducing MACE. By integrating cardiometabolic therapies into oncologic care, we can create a more comprehensive treatment approach that reduces the burden of cardiovascular and renal complications in this vulnerable population. Further research is needed to establish personalized strategies for CKM syndrome prevention and treatment in cancer patients.

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are prevalent cardiovascular diseases that contribute significantly to morbidity, mortality, hospitalisation, and healthcare costs. It is not uncommon for these conditions to coexist and have mutually reinforcing effects. A critical factor in the aetiology of these conditions is oxidative stress, driven by reactive oxygen species (ROS), which contributes to atrial remodelling and fibrosis. The recent introduction of new drugs for the treatment of heart failure has also had an impact on the management of atrial fibrillation due to their influence on oxidative stress. The objective of this review is to analyse the effects of these therapies, including their role in mitigating ROS, on the prevention and treatment of AF in HF patients.

Dyslipidemia is a metabolic disorder characterized by quantitative and/or qualitative abnormalities in serum lipid levels. Elevated serum cholesterol levels can modify the turnover and recruitment of ionic channels in myocytes and cellular homeostasis, including those of inflammatory cells. Experimental and clinical data indicate that inflammation is implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial remodeling, which is the substrate of atrial fibrillation (AF). Data about the association between increased lipid serum levels and AF are few and contrasting. Lipoprotein (a), adiposity, and inflammation seem to be the main drivers of AF; in contrast, low-density lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins and triglycerides are not directly involved in AF onset. The present review aimed to describe the pathophysiological link between dyslipidemia and AF, the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients with and without AF, and the impact of lipid-lowering therapies on AF incidence.

Despite great progress in treating atrial fibrillation (AF), especially with the development of increasingly effective invasive techniques for AF ablation, many unanswered questions remain regarding the pathogenic mechanism of the arrhythmia and its prevention methods. The development of AF is based on anatomical and functional alterations in the cardiomyocyte resulting from altered ionic fluxes and cardiomyocyte electrophysiology. Electric instability and electrical remodeling underlying the arrhythmia may result from oxidative stress, also caused by possible mitochondrial dysfunction. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of AF is not yet fully elucidated; however, the reduction in AF burden after therapeutic interventions that improve mitochondrial fitness tends to support this concept. This selected review aims to summarize the mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction related to AF and the current pharmacological treatment options that target mitochondria to prevent or improve the outcome of AF.

Purpose of Review: Advances in pharmacogenomics have paved the way for personalized medicine. Cardiovascular diseases still represent the leading cause of mortality in the world. The aim of this review is to summarize the background, rationale, and evidence of pharmacogenomics in cardiovascular medicine, in particular, the use of antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, and drugs used for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Recent findings: Randomized clinical trials have supported the role of a genotype-guided approach for antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Numerous studies demonstrate how the risk of ineffectiveness of new oral anticoagulants and vitamin K anticoagulants is linked to various genetic polymorphisms. Furthermore, there is growing evidence to support the association of some genetic variants and poor adherence to statin therapy, for example, due to the appearance of muscular symptoms. There is evidence for resistance to some drugs for the treatment of dyslipidemia, such as anti-PCSK9. Summary: Pharmacogenomics has the potential to improve patient care by providing the right drug to the right patient and could guide the identification of new drug therapies for cardiovascular disease. This is very important in cardiovascular diseases, which have high morbidity and mortality. The improvement in therapy could be reflected in the reduction of healthcare costs and patient mortality.