qiang Zhi Fang

Mr. qiang Zhi Fang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2022 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPing Lyu
Ping Lyu
QFqiang Zhi Fang
qiang Zhi Fang
XWXu Wang
Xu Wang
WHWeibo Huang
Weibo Huang
RZRui Zhang
Rui Zhang
PSPengfei Sun
Pengfei Sun
The mechanical strength, thermal stability, thermal performance, and microstructure of Qtech T26 blast mitigation polyurea (T26 polyurea) were studied using quasi-static and dynamic mechanical experiments, thermogravimetric experiments, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) experiments, and contact explosion and non-contact explosion experiments with polyurea-coated reinforced concrete slabs. Additionally, the energy dissipation mechanism of the coating was analyzed. The blast mitigation ability and blast mitigation mechanism of T26 polyurea-coated reinforced concrete slabs were investigated by analyzing the macroscopic morphology of reinforced concrete slabs with or without coatings and the contact explosion simulation of polyurea-coated reinforced concrete slabs. The results showed that T26 polyurea exhibited a certain strain rate effect. Its initial thermal decomposition temperature reached 286 °C, and its thermal stability was good. After carbonization, carbon slag can form and adhere to the structural surface. The glass transition temperature Tgs of the soft segment was −44.9 °C, and the glass transition temperature Tgh of the hard segment was 36.5 °C, showing a certain amount of microphase separation morphology. After the explosion test, there was a small pit on the front surface of the coated reinforced concrete plate, and there was no damage on the back surface. The integrity of the plate was good. The uncoated reinforced concrete slab had a large crater on the front of the explosion surface, and the back of the explosion surface experienced explosion collapse, concrete crushing, and an overall loss of stability. The numerical simulation results showed that the failure mode of the coated plate was consistent with the test. The kinetic energy conversion rate of the uncoated reinforced concrete plate was 87.27%, and the kinetic energy conversion rate of the coated reinforced concrete plate was 95.36%. The T26 coating improved the kinetic energy conversion rate of the structure and improved the blast mitigation ability of the reinforced concrete plate structure.

11 September 2025 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RZRui Zhang
Rui Zhang
QDQi Dong
Qi Dong
QFqiang Zhi Fang
qiang Zhi Fang
YDYongjun Deng
Yongjun Deng
PLPengcheng Li
Pengcheng Li
WHWeibo Huang
Weibo Huang
To address the challenge of balancing the damping performance with mechanical strength in conventional polyurea materials for blast mitigation, this study develops a constrained layer damping coating structure using Q413t viscoelastic polyurea (Q413t) as the damping layer and FPU-1 flexible polyurea (FPU-1) as the constraining layer. The mechanical behaviors of both types of polyurea were characterized through tensile testing at varying loading speeds, while dynamic thermomechanical analysis was utilized to evaluate their damping properties. A 75 g TNT contact explosion test and finite element simulation were employed to explore the protective mechanism. The results show that Q413t demonstrates significant strain-rate sensitivity under intermediate-strain-rate conditions, whereas FPU-1 exhibits minimal variation in mechanical strength. Q413t demonstrates a superior damping performance over a frequency range of 0–104 Hz. FPU-1 achieved a loss factor of 0.3 when the loading frequency reached 104–105 Hz. Under the 75 g TNT contact explosion load, the configuration with a 1 mm damping layer and a 3 mm constraint layer achieved a maximum displacement reduction of 35.26%. In the constrained layer damping coating, the damping layer contributes to blast protection through energy dissipation and load distribution, while the constraining layer reduces structural deformation by limiting displacement. Relative motion between the layers further enhances the overall damping performance. The constrained layer damping coating provides optimal blast protection when the damping-to-constraining layer thickness ratio is 1:3. The constrained layer damping coating enables the synergistic optimization of mechanical strength and energy dissipation, effectively mitigating structural deformation induced by blast loading and demonstrating promising engineering application potential.