Polyurea has attracted extensive attention from researchers and engineers in the field of blast and impact protection due to its excellent quasi-static mechanical properties and dynamic mechanical properties. Its mechanical properties and energy absorption capacity have been tuned by means of formulation optimization, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and the addition of reinforcing materials. Owing to the special molecular structure of polyurea, the mechanism of polyurea protection against blasts and impacts is the simultaneous effect of multiple properties. For different substrates and structures, polyurea needs to provide different performance characteristics, including adhesion, hardness, breaking elongation, etc., depending on the characteristics of the load to which it is subjected. The current article reviews relevant publications in the field of polyurea blast and impact protection, including material optimization, protection mechanisms and applications in blast and impact protection.
Polyurea has gained significant attention in recent years as a functional polymer material, specifically regarding blast and impact protection. The molecular structure of polyurea is characterized by the rapid reaction between isocyanate and the terminal amine component, and forms an elastomeric copolymer that enhances substrate protection against blast impact and fragmentation penetration. At the nanoscale, a phase-separated microstructure emerges, with dispersed hard segment microregions within a continuous matrix of soft segments. This unique microstructure contributes to the remarkable mechanical properties of polyurea. To maximize these properties, it is crucial to analyze the molecular structure and explore methods like formulation optimization and the incorporation of reinforcing materials or fibers. Current research efforts in polyurea applications for protective purposes primarily concentrate on construction, infrastructure, military, transportation and industrial products and facilities. Future research directions should encompass deliberate formulation design and modification, systematic exploration of factors influencing protective performance across various applications and the integration of numerical simulations and experiments to reveal the protective mechanisms of polyurea. This paper provides an extensive literature review that specifically examines the utilization of polyurea for blast and impact protection. It encompasses discussions on material optimization, protective mechanisms and its applications in blast and impact protection.
Polymer matrix is vulnerable to fire hazards and needs to add flame retardants to enhance its performance and make its application scenarios more extensive. At this stage, it is more necessary to add multiple flame-retardant elements and build a multi-component synergistic system. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been studied for nearly three decades since their introduction. MOFs are known for their structural advantages but have only been applied to flame-retardant polymers for a relatively short period of time. In this paper, we review the development of MOFs utilized as flame retardants and analyze the flame-retardant mechanisms in the gas phase and condensed phase from the original MOF materials, modified MOF composites, and MOF-derived composites as flame retardants, respectively. The effects of carbon-based materials, phosphorus-based materials, nitrogen-based materials, and biomass on the flame-retardant properties of polymers are discussed in the context of MOFs. The construction of MOF multi-structured flame retardants is also introduced, and a variety of MOF-based flame retardants with different morphologies are shown to broaden the ideas for subsequent research.
The mechanical strength, thermal stability, thermal performance, and microstructure of Qtech T26 blast mitigation polyurea (T26 polyurea) were studied using quasi-static and dynamic mechanical experiments, thermogravimetric experiments, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) experiments, and contact explosion and non-contact explosion experiments with polyurea-coated reinforced concrete slabs. Additionally, the energy dissipation mechanism of the coating was analyzed. The blast mitigation ability and blast mitigation mechanism of T26 polyurea-coated reinforced concrete slabs were investigated by analyzing the macroscopic morphology of reinforced concrete slabs with or without coatings and the contact explosion simulation of polyurea-coated reinforced concrete slabs. The results showed that T26 polyurea exhibited a certain strain rate effect. Its initial thermal decomposition temperature reached 286 °C, and its thermal stability was good. After carbonization, carbon slag can form and adhere to the structural surface. The glass transition temperature Tgs of the soft segment was −44.9 °C, and the glass transition temperature Tgh of the hard segment was 36.5 °C, showing a certain amount of microphase separation morphology. After the explosion test, there was a small pit on the front surface of the coated reinforced concrete plate, and there was no damage on the back surface. The integrity of the plate was good. The uncoated reinforced concrete slab had a large crater on the front of the explosion surface, and the back of the explosion surface experienced explosion collapse, concrete crushing, and an overall loss of stability. The numerical simulation results showed that the failure mode of the coated plate was consistent with the test. The kinetic energy conversion rate of the uncoated reinforced concrete plate was 87.27%, and the kinetic energy conversion rate of the coated reinforced concrete plate was 95.36%. The T26 coating improved the kinetic energy conversion rate of the structure and improved the blast mitigation ability of the reinforced concrete plate structure.
In order to further study the blast mitigation performance of polyurea and to investigate the protection mechanism and damage characteristics of polyurea-protected structures under contact explosion loads, based on earlier work, this paper investigated the response and energy absorption performance of polyurea under various frequency loads. Qtech T26 blast mitigation polyurea (T26 polyurea) was adopted to protect the reinforced concrete (RC) slab and damage analysis of the post-explosion specimens was carried out at micro and macro levels. The response and energy absorption capacity of the material towards different frequency loads were investigated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Protective performance of T26 polyurea on RC slab was examined with a 10 kg TNT contact explosion test. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyze the microscopic fracture morphology of the typical areas of the coating after the explosion. The chemical structure changes of the blast-face coating before and after the explosion were compared by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results show that the glass transition region of T26 polyurea is −40 °C to 10 °C, which is a large temperature range, and the microphase separation of T26 polyurea is low. It is significantly influenced by the ambient temperature and loading frequency. The energy absorption of T26 polyurea is realized through the interaction between the hard and soft segments. When the frequency is between 102 Hz and 106 Hz, the loss factor of T26 polyurea is between 0.20 and 0.31, which exhibits a good energy dissipation performance. In the contact explosion of 10 kg TNT, the fragmentation rate of the coated specimen decreased significantly compared with that of the unprotected specimen, realizing the zero fragmentation protection effect on the back-blast face. The maximum deformation area and the main energy absorption area of T26 polyurea under contact explosion is the ring area outside the longitudinal deformation area. The chemical structure of T26 polyurea changed significantly after the explosion; typically the N-H bonds, etc., were broken and the percentage of hydrogen bonding was reduced. T26 polyurea has realized the protection effect of zero fragmentation of large-equivalent contact explosion, which has a high application value for blast mitigation and blast-fragmentation prevention in actual engineering.
To address the challenge of balancing the damping performance with mechanical strength in conventional polyurea materials for blast mitigation, this study develops a constrained layer damping coating structure using Q413t viscoelastic polyurea (Q413t) as the damping layer and FPU-1 flexible polyurea (FPU-1) as the constraining layer. The mechanical behaviors of both types of polyurea were characterized through tensile testing at varying loading speeds, while dynamic thermomechanical analysis was utilized to evaluate their damping properties. A 75 g TNT contact explosion test and finite element simulation were employed to explore the protective mechanism. The results show that Q413t demonstrates significant strain-rate sensitivity under intermediate-strain-rate conditions, whereas FPU-1 exhibits minimal variation in mechanical strength. Q413t demonstrates a superior damping performance over a frequency range of 0–104 Hz. FPU-1 achieved a loss factor of 0.3 when the loading frequency reached 104–105 Hz. Under the 75 g TNT contact explosion load, the configuration with a 1 mm damping layer and a 3 mm constraint layer achieved a maximum displacement reduction of 35.26%. In the constrained layer damping coating, the damping layer contributes to blast protection through energy dissipation and load distribution, while the constraining layer reduces structural deformation by limiting displacement. Relative motion between the layers further enhances the overall damping performance. The constrained layer damping coating provides optimal blast protection when the damping-to-constraining layer thickness ratio is 1:3. The constrained layer damping coating enables the synergistic optimization of mechanical strength and energy dissipation, effectively mitigating structural deformation induced by blast loading and demonstrating promising engineering application potential.