28 June 2022 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
21 December 2022 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
14 March 2022 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Objectives: The main objective of the study was to compare the dimensional ridge changes and the histological composition after the use of an allograft or xenograft and a resorbable membrane in ridge preservation in molar sites and to evaluate the influence of bone plate thickness on dimensional changes and the need of lateral sinus augmentation following ridge preservation.Materials and methods: Twenty‐four patients in need of maxillary or mandibular first or second molar extraction and subsequent implant placement were included and randomly assigned to a group; allograft or xenograft, plus a collagen membrane. Cone‐beam computed tomographies were obtained after molar extraction and after 5 months. A bone sample was harvested at the time of implant placement and analyzed by histomorphometry.Results: Bone ridge was reduced significantly. Major changes in width occurred at 1 mm from the bone crest (−2.93 ± 2.28 mm) (p = .0002), while in height, the greatest reduction occurred at the buccal area (−1.97 ± 2.21 mm) (p = .0006). However, differences between groups were not significant. Thicker buccal bone plates exhibited less bone remodeling, while histologically, both biomaterials resulted in similar tissue composition. The resulting available bone height in the implant site measured 7.30 ± 3.53 mm initially and 6.8 ± 3.61 mm after 5 months which allowed implant placement without the need for lateral sinus augmentation in all cases. Still, 55% of the preserved areas needed transcrestal sinus lift.Conclusion: Ridge preservation in molar sites using a mineralized allograft or xenograft provides similar dimensional and histomorphometrical results after 5 months.
7 June 2021 in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
12 December 2022 in Journal of Periodontology
Background: The objective of this trial was to investigate the clinical and radiographic significance of using a mixture of mineralized and demineralized allografts in combination (M) or not (NM) with a resorbable cross‐linked barrier membrane in the reconstructive therapy of peri‐implantitis defects.Methods: A two‐arm randomized clinical trial was performed in patients diagnosed with peri‐implantitis that exhibited contained defects. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), and 12 months (T2). Radiographic parameters were recorded at T0 and T2. A composite criterion for disease resolution was defined a priori. A generalized linear model of repeated measures with generalized estimation equation statistical methods was used.Results: Overall, 33 patients (nimplants = 48) completed the study. At T2, mean disease resolution was 77.1%. The use of a barrier membrane did not enhance the probability of disease resolution at T2 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, p = 0.737). Conversely, the odds of disease resolution were statistically associated with the modified plaque index recorded at T0 (OR = 0.13, p = 0.006) and keratinized mucosa width (OR = 2.10, p = 0.035). Moreover, women exhibited greater odds to show disease resolution (OR = 5.56, p = 0.02).Conclusion: Reconstructive therapy by means of a mixture of mineralized and demineralized allografts is effective in clinically resolving peri‐implantitis and in gaining radiographic marginal bone level. The addition of a barrier membrane to reconstructive therapy of peri‐implantitis does not seem to enhance the outcomes of contained bone defects (NCT05282667).