Thanks to their anti-inflammatory, anti-oedema, and anti-allergy properties, glucocorticoids are among the most widely prescribed drugs in patients with cancer. The indications for glucocorticoid use are very wide and varied in the context of cancer and include the symptomatic management of cancer-related symptoms (compression, pain, oedema, altered general state) but also prevention or treatment of common side effects of anti-cancer therapies (nausea, allergies, etc.) or immune-related adverse events (irAE). In this review, we first give an overview of the different clinical situations where glucocorticoids are used in oncology. Next, we describe the current state of knowledge regarding the effects of these molecules on immune response, in particular anti-tumour response, and we summarize available data evaluating how these effects may interfere with the efficacy of immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting PD1/PD-L1 are game changers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but biomarkers are lacking. We previously reported the prognostic role of splenic volume in digestive cancer and its correlation with the presence of immunosuppressive cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of splenic volume in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We conducted a retrospective study of 276 patients receiving ICIs for advanced NSCLC in the Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center. The association between splenic volume at baseline and at two months of therapy and progression-free survival (PFS) during ICI treatment or overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation was evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. Splenic volume during treatment and the change in splenic volume were associated with poor PFS (respectively p = 0.02 and p = 0.001) and with OS (respectively p < 1.10⁻³ and p < 1.10⁻³). Baseline splenic volume at the first evaluation was also associated with poor OS (p = 0.001). LDH rate and dNLR were positively correlated with splenic volume, as well as with its evolution. After the adjustment of clinical variables, splenic volumes remained a predictive marker of immunotherapy efficacy. Splenic volume is a prognostic biomarker in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs.

Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer worldwide. With its increasing incidence, it is a major public health problem, with many therapeutic challenges such as precision medicine for personalized treatment. Thanks to next-generation sequencing (NGS), progress in biomedical technologies, and the use of bioinformatics, it is now possible to identify specific molecular alterations in tumor cells—such as homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD)—enabling us to consider using DNA-damaging agents such as platinum salts or PARP inhibitors. Different approaches currently exist to analyze impairment of the homologous recombination pathway, e.g., the search for specific mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, such as BRCA1/2; the use of genomic scars or mutational signatures; or the development of functional tests. Nevertheless, the role and value of these different tests in breast cancer treatment decisions remains to be clarified. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the clinical utility of genomic tests, evaluating HRR deficiency for treatment decisions in early and metastatic breast cancer.

Despite a few cases of long-responder patients, immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 has so far proved rather disappointing in monotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, prompting the use of synergistic therapeutic combinations incorporating immunotherapy by immune-checkpoint inhibitors. In addition, a better understanding of both the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to immunotherapy, as well as the immunological effects of the usual treatments for breast cancer, make it possible to rationally consider this type of therapeutic combination. For several years, certain treatments, commonly used to treat patients with breast cancer, have shown that in addition to their direct cytotoxic effects, they may have an impact on the tumor immune microenvironment, by increasing the antigenicity and/or immunogenicity of a “cold” tumor, targeting the immunosuppressive microenvironment or counteracting the immune-exclusion profile. This review focuses on preclinical immunologic synergic mechanisms of various standard therapeutic approaches with anti-PD-(L)1, and discusses the potential clinical use of anti-PD-1/L1 combinations in metastatic or early breast cancer.

In preclinical mouse models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we show that a combination of chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) and eribulin (Eri) was additive from an immunological point of view and was accompanied by the induction of an intratumoral immune and inflammatory response favored by the immunogenic cell death induced by CDDP, as well as by the vascular and tumor stromal remodeling induced by each chemotherapy. Unexpectedly, despite the favorable immune context created by this immunomodulatory chemotherapy combination, our models remained refractory to the addition of anti–PD-L1 immunotherapy. These surprising observations led us to discover that CDDP chemotherapy was simultaneously responsible for the production of TGF-β by several populations of cells present in tumors, which favored the emergence of different subpopulations of immune cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts characterized by immunosuppressive properties. Accordingly, co-treatment with anti–TGF-β restored the immunological synergy between this immunogenic doublet of chemotherapy and anti–PD-L1 in a CD8-dependent manner. Translational studies revealed the unfavorable prognostic effect of the TGF-β pathway on the immune response in human TNBC, as well as the ability of CDDP to induce this cytokine also in human TNBC cell lines, thus highlighting the clinical relevance of targeting TGF-β in the context of human TNBC treated with chemoimmunotherapy.

Brigatinib is a next-generation ALK inhibitor (ALKi) that shows efficacy in ALK inhibitor naïve and post-crizotinib ALK⁺ advanced NSCLCs (aNSCLCs). The efficacy of brigatinib was retrospectively assessed in patients with aNSCLCs included in the brigatinib French Early-Access Program (1 August 2016–21 January 2019). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (invPFS) and the primary analysis was updated in 2021 with a longer follow-up, focused on post-brigatinib lorlatinib efficacy. Sixty-six centers included 183 patients: median age 60 ± 12.7 years; 78.3% never/former smokers; median of 3 ± 1 previous lines and 2 ± 0.5 ALKis; 37.1% ECOG PS 2 and 55.6% >3 metastatic sites. The median follow-up from brigatinib initiation was 40.4 months (95% CI 38.4–42.4). InvPFS was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.9–9.6), median duration of treatment (mDOT) was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.8–9.4) and median overall survival (mOS) was 20.3 months (95% CI 15.6–27.6). The median DOT and OS from brigatinib initiation tend to decrease with the number of ALK inhibitors used in previous lines of therapy. Based on the data collected, 92 (50.3%) patients received ≥1 agent(s) post-brigatinib and 68 (73.9%) of them received lorlatinib, with 51 (75%) immediately receiving it post-brigatinib, 12 (17.6%) receiving it after one and 5 (7.4%) after ≥2 subsequent treatments. The median follow-up was 29.9 (95% CI 25.7–33.1) months. Lorlatinib mDOT was 5.3 (95% CI 3.6–7.6) months with a median OS from lorlatinib initiation of 14.1 (95% CI 10.3–19.2) months. The results of the brigALK2 study confirm the efficacy of brigatinib in a population of heavily pretreated ALK⁺ aNSCLC patients and provide new data on the activity of lorlatinib after brigatinib.