The success of anticancer treatments relies on a long-term response which can be mediated by the immune system. Thus, the concept of immunogenic cell death (ICD) describes the capacity of dying cancer cells, under chemotherapy or physical stress, to express or release danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). These DAMPs are essential to activate dendritic cells (DCs) and to stimulate an antigen presentation to CD8 cytotoxic cells. Then, activated CD8 T cells exert their antitumor effects through cytotoxic molecules, an effect which is transitory due to the establishment of a feedback loop leading to T-cell exhaustion. This phenomenon can be reversed using immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), such as anti-PD-1, PD-L1 or CTLA-4 Abs. However, the blockade of these checkpoints is efficient only if the CD8 T cells are recruited within the tumor. The CD8 T-cell chemoattraction is mediated by chemokines. Hence, an important question is whether the ICD can not only influence the DC activation and resulting CD8 T-cell activation but can also favor the chemokine production at the tumor site, thus triggering their recruitment. This is the aim of this review, in which we will decipher the role of some chemokines (and their specific receptors), shown to be released during ICD, on the CD8 T-cell recruitment and antitumor response. We will also analyze the clinical applications of these chemokines as predictive or prognostic markers or as new targets which should be used to improve patients’ response.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Immunotherapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has revolutionized treatment, providing durable responses in a subset of patients. However, with fewer than 50% of patients achieving significant benefits, there is a critical need to expand therapeutic strategies. This review explores emerging targets in immune checkpoint inhibition beyond PD-1/PD-L1, including CTLA-4, TIGIT, LAG-3, TIM-3, NKG2A, and CD39/CD73. We highlight the biological basis of CD8 T cell exhaustion in shaping the antitumor immune response. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting additional inhibitory receptors (IR) are discussed, with a focus on their distinct mechanisms of action and combinatory potential with existing therapies. Despite significant advancements, challenges remain in overcoming resistance mechanisms and optimizing patient selection. This review underscores the importance of dual checkpoint blockade and innovative bispecific antibody engineering to maximize therapeutic outcomes for NSCLC patients.

Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer worldwide. With its increasing incidence, it is a major public health problem, with many therapeutic challenges such as precision medicine for personalized treatment. Thanks to next-generation sequencing (NGS), progress in biomedical technologies, and the use of bioinformatics, it is now possible to identify specific molecular alterations in tumor cells—such as homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD)—enabling us to consider using DNA-damaging agents such as platinum salts or PARP inhibitors. Different approaches currently exist to analyze impairment of the homologous recombination pathway, e.g., the search for specific mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, such as BRCA1/2; the use of genomic scars or mutational signatures; or the development of functional tests. Nevertheless, the role and value of these different tests in breast cancer treatment decisions remains to be clarified. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the clinical utility of genomic tests, evaluating HRR deficiency for treatment decisions in early and metastatic breast cancer.

Many non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remain unresponsive to the current standard of care, which includes chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, like anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. While interleukin (IL)-1β is known to promote lung cancer growth in humans and mice, we show here that IL-1β administration or overexpression overcomes resistance to classical chemo-immunotherapy (cisplatin/pemetrexed/anti-PD-1) in mouse lung cancer models. The antitumor effects of IL-1β rely on cancer cell-derived CXCL10 which mediates CD8 T cell recruitment at the tumor site. In lung cancer cells, Thioredoxin Interacting Protein (TXNIP) induces mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release in the cytosol, activating Absence in Melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasome, which subsequently triggers IL-1β and CXCL10 secretion, thereby reversing chemo-immunotherapy resistance. The clinical relevance of our findings is supported by the transcriptomic analysis of patient tumors, showing that high expression of IL1B, IL1R1, AIM2 and/or TXNIP is associated with better response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Additionally, drug screening identifies MEK and MDM2 inhibitors as inducers of TXNIP expression capable of reversing resistance to chemo-immunotherapy. This study highlights a positive role of IL-1β in lung cancer treatment and suggests that enhancing IL-1β production at the tumor site can overcome resistance to chemo-immunotherapy.

A novel crosstalk between immunogenic and oncometabolic pathways triggered by T cell-released interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ) has been recently identified. This IFN-ɣ-pyruvate kinase M2-β-catenin axis relies on fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) signaling in tumor cells and leads to hyperprogressive disease on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in preclinical models. This result underlines how IFN-ɣ signaling may have distinct effects on tumor cells depending on their oncogenic and metabolic features. On the basis of these data, this study aims to explore the relationship between genomic tumor FGF2 or FGF/FGF receptor (FGFR) amplification and immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic solid cancers. We used a large genomic data set of 545 ICB-treated patients and compared outcomes between those with and without FGF2 genomic amplification. Patients with no FGF2 genomic amplification had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.55 (95% CI 0.4, 0.8); p value=0.005) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.56 (0.3, 0.9); p value=0.02) than patients harboring an FGF2 amplification. We next questioned whether such an observation may extend to genomic amplification of the FGF/FGFR pathway. Similarly, patients with no FGF/FGFR genomic amplification had longer PFS (HR=0.71 (0.8, 0.9), p value=0.004) and OS (HR=0.77 (0.6, 1); p value=0.06). RNA sequencing analysis of tumors between the amplified and non-amplified populations showed distinct expression profiles concerning oncogenic pathways. Importantly, using a cohort of patients untreated with ICB from the The Cancer Genome Atlas, we show that FGF2 and FGF/FGFR genomic amplification were not associated with prognosis, thus demonstrating that we identified a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy resistance.