Kristin  Piikki

Kristin Piikki

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 March 2007 in Photosynthesis Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JUJ. Uddling
J. Uddling
JGJ. Gelang-Alfredsson
J. Gelang-Alfredsson
KPKristin Piikki
Kristin Piikki
HPH. Pleijel
H. Pleijel

4 January 2020 in Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJob Maguta
Job Maguta
PBP. Bolo
P. Bolo
MKM. Kinyua
M. Kinyua
JRJ. Rurinda
J. Rurinda
KPKristin Piikki
Kristin Piikki
A synthesis of available agronomic datasets and peer-reviewed scientific literature was conducted to: (1) assess the status of micronutrients in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) arable soils, (2) improve the understanding of the relations between soil quality/management and crop nutritional quality and (3) evaluate the potential profitability of application of secondary and micronutrients to key food crops in SSA, namely maize (Zea maysL.), beans (Phaseolusspp. andVicia fabaL.), wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) and rice (Oryza sativaL.). We found that there is evidence of widespread but varying micronutrient deficiencies in SSA arable soils and that simultaneous deficiencies of multiple elements (co-occurrence) are prevalent. Zinc (Zn) predominates the list of micronutrients that are deficient in SSA arable soils. Boron (B), iron (Fe), molybdenum (Mo) and copper (Cu) deficiencies are also common. Micronutrient fertilization/agronomic biofortification increases micronutrient concentrations in edible plant organs, and it was profitable to apply fertilizers containing micronutrient elements in 60–80% of the cases. However, both the plant nutritional quality and profit had large variations. Possible causes of this variation may be differences in crop species and cultivars, fertilizer type and application methods, climate and initial soil conditions, and soil chemistry effects on nutrient availability for crop uptake. Therefore, micronutrient use efficiency can be improved by adapting the rates and types of fertilizers to site-specific soil and management conditions. To make region-wide nutritional changes using agronomic biofortification, major policy interventions are needed.

22 January 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cecilia OnyangoCecilia Onyango
Cecilia Onyango
JNJustine Nyaga
Justine Nyaga
JWJohanna Wetterlind
Johanna Wetterlind
MSMats Söderström
Mats Söderström
KPKristin Piikki
Kristin Piikki
Opportunities exist for adoption of precision agriculture technologies in all parts of the world. The form of precision agriculture may vary from region to region depending on technologies available, knowledge levels and mindsets. The current review examined research articles in the English language on precision agriculture practices for increased productivity among smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. A total of 7715 articles were retrieved and after screening 128 were reviewed. The results indicate that a number of precision agriculture technologies have been tested under SSA conditions and show promising results. The most promising precision agriculture technologies identified were the use of soil and plant sensors for nutrient and water management, as well as use of satellite imagery, GIS and crop-soil simulation models for site-specific management. These technologies have been shown to be crucial in attainment of appropriate management strategies in terms of efficiency and effectiveness of resource use in SSA. These technologies are important in supporting sustainable agricultural development. Most of these technologies are, however, at the experimental stage, with only South Africa having applied them mainly in large-scale commercial farms. It is concluded that increased precision in input and management practices among SSA smallholder farmers can significantly improve productivity even without extra use of inputs.

15 December 2020 in Soil Use and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKristin Piikki
Kristin Piikki
JWJohanna Wetterlind
Johanna Wetterlind
MSMats Söderström
Mats Söderström
BSBo Stenberg
Bo Stenberg
We performed a systematic mapping of validation methods used in digital soil mapping (DSM), in order to gain an overview of current practices and make recommendations for future publications on DSM studies. A systematic search and screening procedure, largely following the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) protocol, was carried out. It yielded a database of 188 peer‐reviewed DSM studies from the past two decades, all written in English and all presenting a raster map of a continuous soil property. Review of the full‐texts showed that most publications (97%) included some type of map validation, while just over one‐third (35%) estimated map uncertainty. Most commonly, a combination of multiple (existing) soil sampe datasets was used and the resulting maps were validated by single data‐splitting or cross‐validation. It was common for essential information to be lacking in method descriptions. This is unfortunate, as lack of information on sampling design (missing in 25% of 188 studies) and sample support (missing in 45% of 188 studies) makes it difficult to interpret what derived validation metrics represent, compromising their usefulness. Therefore, we present a list of method details that should be provided in DSM studies. We also provide a detailed summary of the 28 validation metrics used in published DSM studies, how to interpret the values obtained and whether the metrics can be compared between datasets or soil attributes.


11 February 2020 in Grassland Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bezaye Gorfu TessemaBezaye Gorfu Tessema
Bezaye Gorfu Tessema
RSRolf Sommer
Rolf Sommer
KPKristin Piikki
Kristin Piikki
MSMats Söderström
Mats Söderström
SNSara Namirembe
Sara Namirembe
BPBirthe Paul
Birthe Paul
Grasslands occupy almost half of the world's land area. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a key indicator of soil fertility and grassland productivity. Increasing SOC stocks (so‐called SOC sequestration) improves soil fertility and contributes to climate change mitigation by binding atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Grasslands constitute about 70% of all agricultural land, but their potential for SOC sequestration is largely unknown. This review paper quantitatively summarizes observation‐based studies on the SOC sequestration potential of grasslands in six East African countries (Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda) and seeks to identify knowledge gaps related to SOC sequestration potential in the region. In the studies reviewed, SOC stocks in grasslands range from 3 to 93 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.3 m of the soil profile, while SOC sequestration rate ranges from 0.1 to 3.1 Mg C ha‐1 year‐1 under different management strategies. Grazing management is reported to have a considerable impact on SOC sequestration rates, and grassland regeneration and protection are recommended as options to stimulate SOC sequestration. However, a very limited number of relevant studies are available (n = 23) and there is a need for fundamental information on SOC sequestration potential in the region. The effectiveness of potential incentive mechanisms, such as payments for environmental services, to foster uptake of SOC‐enhancing practices should also be assessed.