Todd Jensen

Dr. Todd Jensen

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

12 February 2015 in Marriage & Family Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJTodd Jensen
Todd Jensen
MHMatthew O. Howard
Matthew O. Howard
Stepfamily scholars have emphasized the importance of including stepchildren in the analysis and discussion of stepfamily life. This systematic review synthesized recent research examining predictors/correlates of stepparent–child relationship quality from the viewpoint of stepchildren in the United States. Five bibliographic databases were searched, resulting in 631 potentially relevant studies for review. Manual searches of three prominent family studies journals were also conducted. Screening and eligibility assessment based on a priori inclusion criteria yielded a final sample of 23 studies, including published studies and reports found in the “gray” literature. Significant predictors/correlates associated with stepchildren's perceptions of stepparent–child relationship quality were grouped into the following conceptual domains: individual characteristics, family characteristics, features of (step)parent–child interactions, and stepcouple dynamics. Limitations, implications, and future research directions are discussed.

1 June 2016 in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LGLaurie M. Graham
Laurie M. Graham
TJTodd Jensen
Todd Jensen
AGAshley D. Givens
Ashley D. Givens
GBGary L. Bowen
Gary L. Bowen
CRCynthia F. Rizo
Cynthia F. Rizo
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive social issue with numerous detrimental effects on individuals, families, and society. Existing research and a social-ecological minority stress framework suggest, as compared with mixed-sex couples, those in same-sex relationships may be at heightened risk for perpetrating and experiencing IPV. Using a U.S. sample of college students (N = 4,081), this secondary data analysis contrasted the prevalence of five forms of IPV (i.e., physical, sexual, psychological, injury, any type) between those in mixed-sex (n = 3,960) and those in same-sex (n = 121) intimate partnerships. Comparative analyses were supplemented with propensity score weighting to help balance members of mixed-sex and same-sex relationships across eight potentially confounding variables (e.g., biological sex, age). Prior to the application of propensity score weighting, results suggested those in same-sex relationships are significantly more likely to perpetrate and/or experience IPV resulting in physical injury. Results from post-weighting analyses retained the significance and magnitude of model estimates. Taken together, results suggest, as compared with mixed-sex couples, U.S. college students in same-sex couples have greater odds of experiencing IPV perpetration and victimization resulting in physical injury, even after accounting for the influence of several potentially confounding variables. Findings support the utility and future application of propensity score analytic techniques in this type of research as well as the importance of recognizing the unique IPV risk and service needs of people in same-sex relationships.

10 May 2015 in Child & Family Social Work
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TJTodd Jensen
Todd Jensen
KSKevin Shafer
Kevin Shafer
EHErin K. Holmes
Erin K. Holmes

7 March 2017 in Family Process
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TJTodd Jensen
Todd Jensen
MLMelissa A. Lippold
Melissa A. Lippold
RMRoger Mills‐Koonce
Roger Mills‐Koonce
GFGregory M. Fosco
Gregory M. Fosco

26 November 2012 in Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKevin Shafer
Kevin Shafer
TJTodd Jensen
Todd Jensen
JLJeffry H. Larson
Jeffry H. Larson