Shona Pennock

Dr. Shona Pennock

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2022 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Mercedes MovsessianMaria Mercedes Movsessian
Maria Mercedes Movsessian
SPShona Pennock
Shona Pennock
TBTianna Bloise-Thomaz
Tianna Bloise-Thomaz
HJHenry Jeffrey
Henry Jeffrey
MDMatthew J. Dickson
Matthew J. Dickson

7 April 2022 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SPShona Pennock
Shona Pennock
Maria Mercedes MovsessianMaria Mercedes Movsessian
Maria Mercedes Movsessian
TBTianna Bloise-Thomaz
Tianna Bloise-Thomaz
HJHenry Jeffrey
Henry Jeffrey
MDMatthew J. Dickson
Matthew J. Dickson

19 January 2023 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDanny Coles
Danny Coles
BWBevan Wray
Bevan Wray
RSRob Stevens
Rob Stevens
SCScott Crawford
Scott Crawford
SPShona Pennock
Shona Pennock
JMJon Miles
Jon Miles

23 December 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pablo Ruiz-MinguelaPablo Ruiz-Minguela
Pablo Ruiz-Minguela
DNDonald R. Noble
Donald R. Noble
Vincenzo NavaVincenzo Nava
Vincenzo Nava
SPShona Pennock
Shona Pennock
Jesús M. BlancoJesús M. Blanco
Jesús M. Blanco
HJHenry Jeffrey
Henry Jeffrey
The development of new renewable energy technologies is generally perceived as a critical factor in the fight against climate change. However, significant difficulties arise when estimating the future performance and costs of nascent technologies such as wave energy. Robust methods to estimate the commercial costs that emerging technologies may reach in the future are needed to inform decision-making. The aim of this paper is to increase the clarity, consistency, and utility of future cost estimates for emerging wave energy technologies. It proposes a novel three-step method: (1) using a combination of existing bottom-up and top-down approaches to derive the current cost breakdown; (2) assigning uncertainty ranges, depending on the estimation reliability then used, to derive the first-of-a-kind cost of the commercial technology; and (3) applying component-based learning rates to produce the LCOE of a mature technology using the upper bound from (2) to account for optimism bias. This novel method counters the human propensity toward over-optimism. Compared with state-of-the-art direct estimation approaches, it provides a tool that can be used to explore uncertainties and focus attention on the accuracy of cost estimates and potential learning from the early stage of technology development. Moreover, this approach delivers useful information to identify remaining technology challenges, concentrate innovation efforts, and collect evidence through testing activities.

22 June 2023 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SPShona Pennock
Shona Pennock
DNDonald R. Noble
Donald R. Noble
YVYelena Vardanyan
Yelena Vardanyan
TDTimur Delahaye
Timur Delahaye
HJHenry Jeffrey
Henry Jeffrey

25 February 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPShona Pennock
Shona Pennock
AGAnna Garcia-Teruel
Anna Garcia-Teruel
DNDonald R. Noble
Donald R. Noble
OROwain Roberts
Owain Roberts
AAAdrian de Andres
Adrian de Andres
HJHenry Jeffrey
Henry Jeffrey
This work investigates potential cost reduction trajectories of three emerging offshore renewable energy technologies (floating offshore wind, tidal stream, and wave) with respect to meeting ambitious cost targets set out in the Strategic Energy Technology Implementation Plans (SET-Plans) for Offshore Wind and Ocean Energy. A methodology is presented which calculates target costs for current early-stage devices, starting from the 2030 SET-Plan levelised cost targets. Component-based experience curves have been applied as part of the methodology, characterised through the comparative maturity level of each technology-specific cost centre. The resultant early-stage target costs are then compared with actual costs for current devices to highlight where further cost reduction is still required. It has been found that innovation and development requirements to reach these targets vary greatly between different technologies, based on their current level of technological maturity. Future funding calls and programmes should be designed with these variables in mind to support innovative developments in offshore renewables. The method presented in this paper has been applied to publicly available cost data for emerging renewable technologies and is fully adaptable to calculate the innovation requirements for specific early-stage renewable energy devices.