Rafael Pastor

Dr. Rafael Pastor

Department of Management, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2009 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLuigi Martino
Luigi Martino
RPRafael Pastor
Rafael Pastor
The general assembly line balancing problem with setups (GALBPS) was recently defined in the literature. It adds sequence-dependent setup time considerations to the classical simple assembly line balancing problem (SALBP) as follows: whenever a task is assigned next to another at the same workstation, a setup time must be added to compute the global workstation time, thereby providing the task sequence inside each workstation. This paper proposes heuristic procedures, based on priority rules, for solving GALBPS, many of which are an improvement upon heuristic procedures published to date.

9 April 2009 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRafael Pastor
Rafael Pastor
LFLaia Ferrer-Martí
Laia Ferrer-Martí
The simple assembly line balancing problem (SALBP) has been extensively examined in the literature. Various mathematical programs have been developed to solve SALBP type-1 (minimising the number of workstations, m, for a given cycle time, ct) and SALBP type-2 (minimising ct given m). Usually, an initial pre-process is carried out to calculate the range of workstations to which a task i may be assigned, in order to reduce the number of variables of task–workstation assignment. This paper presents a more effective mathematical program than those released to date to solve SALBP-1 and SALBP-2. The key idea is to introduce additional constraints in the mathematical program, based on the fact that the range of workstations to which a task i may be assigned depends either on the upper bound on the number of workstations or on the upper bound on the cycle time (for SALBP-1 and SALBP-2, respectively). A computational experiment was carried out and the results reveal the superiority of the mathematical program proposed.

27 October 2007 in Journal of Heuristics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLiliana Capacho
Liliana Capacho
RPRafael Pastor
Rafael Pastor
Alexandre DolguiAlexandre Dolgui
Alexandre Dolgui
OGOlga Guschinskaya
Olga Guschinskaya

1 December 2020 in Computers & Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHarry Aguilar
Harry Aguilar
AGAlberto García-Villoria
Alberto García-Villoria
RPRafael Pastor
Rafael Pastor

15 April 2008 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiliana Capacho
Liliana Capacho
RPRafael Pastor
Rafael Pastor
Assembly line balancing problems basically consist of assigning a set of tasks to a group of workstations while maintaining the tasks’ precedence relations, which are represented by a predetermined precedence graph. However, one or more parts of a product's assembly process may admit alternative precedence subgraphs, which represent possible assembly variants. In general, because of the great difficulty of the problem and the impossibility of representing alternative subgraphs in a precedence graph, the system designer will decide to select, a priori, one of such alternative subgraphs. This paper presents, characterizes and formulates a new general assembly line balancing problem with practical relevance: the alternative subgraphs assembly line balancing problem (ASALBP). Its novel characteristic is that it considers the possibility of having alternative assembly subgraphs, with the processing times and/or the precedence relations of certain tasks dependent on the assembly subgraph selected. Therefore, solving this problem implies simultaneously selecting an assembly subgraph for each part of the assembly that allows alternatives and balancing the line. The potentially positive effects of this on the solution of the problem are shown in a numerical example. Finally, a simple mathematical programming model is described and the results of a brief computational experiment are presented.

25 February 2011 in Journal of Global Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LFLaia Ferrer-Martí
Laia Ferrer-Martí
RPRafael Pastor
Rafael Pastor
GCG. Miquel Capó
G. Miquel Capó
EVEnrique Velo
Enrique Velo