Stefan Lindinger

Prof. Dr. Stefan Lindinger


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 November 2019 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMasaki Takeda
Masaki Takeda
NMNaoto Miyamoto
Naoto Miyamoto
TETakaaki Endo
Takaaki Endo
OOOlli Ohtonen
Olli Ohtonen
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger
Thomas StögglThomas Stöggl
Thomas Stöggl
Cross-country skiing (XCS) embraces a broad variety of techniques applied like a gear system according to external conditions, slope topography, and skier-related factors. The continuous detection of applied skiing techniques and cycle characteristics by application of unobtrusive sensor technology can provide useful information to enhance the quality of training and competition. (1) Background: We evaluated the possibility of using a high-precision kinematic global navigation satellite system (GNSS) to detect cross-country skiing classical style technique. (2) Methods: A world-class male XC skier was analyzed during a classical style 5.3-km time trial recorded with a high-precision kinematic GNSS attached to the skier’s head. A video camera was mounted on the lumbar region of the skier to detect the type and number of cycles of each technique used during the entire time trial. Based on the GNSS trajectory, distinct patterns of head displacement (up-down head motion) for each classical technique (e.g., diagonal stride (DIA), double poling (DP), kick double poling (KDP), herringbone (HB), and downhill) were defined. The applied skiing technique, skiing duration, skiing distance, skiing speed, and cycle time within a technique and the number of cycles were visually analyzed using both the GNSS signal and the video data by independent persons. Distinct patterns for each technique were counted by two methods: Head displacement with course inclination and without course inclination (net up-down head motion). (3) Results: Within the time trial, 49.6% (6 min, 46 s) was DP, 18.7% (2 min, 33 s) DIA, 6.1% (50 s) KDP, 3.3% (27 s) HB, and 22.3% (3 min, 03 s) downhill with respect to total skiing time (13 min, 09 s). The %Match for both methods 1 and 2 (net head motion) was high: 99.2% and 102.4%, respectively, for DP; 101.7% and 95.9%, respectively, for DIA; 89.4% and 100.0%, respectively, for KDP; 86.0% and 96.5%, respectively, in HB; and 98.6% and 99.6%, respectively, in total. (4) Conclusions: Based on the results of our study, it is suggested that a high-precision kinematic GNSS can be applied for precise detection of the type of technique, and the number of cycles used, duration, skiing speed, skiing distance, and cycle time for each technique, during a classical style XCS race.

10 February 2022 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMats Ainegren
Mats Ainegren
Vesa LinnamoVesa Linnamo
Vesa Linnamo
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effects of aerodynamic drag and drafting on propulsive force (F PROP), drag area (C D A), oxygen cost (V˙O2), metabolic rate (E˙), and heart rate (HR) during roller skiing on a treadmill in a wind tunnel using the double poling technique. A secondary aim was to investigate the effects of wind versus no-wind test conditions on the same physiological parameters. Methods: Ten subjects of each gender participated in the experiments. One pair of skiers of the same gender roller skied simultaneously in line with the air flow; the distance between the skiers was ~2.05 m. Each pair was tested as follows: I) with wind, leading; II) with wind, drafting; and III) without wind. The treadmill inclination was 0° throughout the tests. For the wind conditions, the air velocity was similar to the treadmill belt speed: 3 to 7 m·s−1 for men and 3 to 6 m·s−1 for women. Results: Drafting resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) lower F PROP, C D A, V˙O2, and E˙, compared with leading, for both genders at racing speed but not at lower speeds, whereas HR was only affected for the male skiers at racing speed. The test without wind resulted in significantly lower F PROP, V˙O2, and E˙ at all tested speeds compared with the tests with wind present, whereas HR was lower only at higher speeds. Conclusions: At racing speed, but not at lower speeds, the positive effects of drafting behind a skier during double poling were obvious and resulted in a lower F PROP, C D A, V˙O2, E˙, and HR. Tests without wind present put even lower demands on the skiers’ physiology, which was also evident at lower speeds.

10 May 2021 in Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMagdalena Karczewska-Lindinger
Magdalena Karczewska-Lindinger
VLVesa Linnamo
Vesa Linnamo
VRValeria Rosso
Valeria Rosso
LGLaura Gastaldi
Laura Gastaldi
WRWalter Rapp
Walter Rapp
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger
Purpose: To biomechanically profile force generation connected to the complex role of the trunk in double poling in a representative sample of Para-Nordic sit-skiers.Methods: Twelve male World Cup Para-Nordic sit-skiers (sport classes: LW10–12) were skiing on flat snow terrain at submaximal speed of 4.5 m/s (~ 73% maximum speed). 2D video (50 Hz) and pole force analyses (1000 Hz) were performed synchronously, examining angle, force and cycle characteristics to analyse the role of the trunk in generating propulsion.Results: LW10–11.5 skiers lost between 21% and 4% propulsive force versus LW12 athletes only due to different geometrics of the trunk and pole angle at an equal axial pole force. While LW10–11 skiers indicated trunk extension or position maintenance during pole thrust, LW11.5–12 skiers showed strong trunk flexion combined with smaller pole angles to the ground. Hence, LW11.5–12 skiers could create larger propulsive forces and therefore greater cycle lengths at lower cycle rates at the same speed. Maximum speed increased from LW10 to LW12 and was significantly correlated to trunk flexion range of motion (r = 0.63) and cycle length (r = 0.59). Trunk flexion ROM showed a significant relationship to the impulse of propulsive force (r = 0.63) and pole angle to the ground (r = − 0.76) (allP < 0.05).Conclusion: The impact of impairment on the force production profiles and its physiological-biomechanical consequences need further investigation also in other terrains and at wider spectrums of skiing speeds. The evident problem of low numbers of LW10–11 skiers in World Cup needs creative future solutions for research.

5 April 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shuang ZhaoShuang Zhao
Shuang Zhao
OOOlli Ohtonen
Olli Ohtonen
KRKeijo Ruotsalainen
Keijo Ruotsalainen
LKLauri Kettunen
Lauri Kettunen
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger
Vesa LinnamoVesa Linnamo
Vesa Linnamo
This study evaluated two approaches for estimating the total propulsive force on a skier’s center of mass (COM) with double-poling (DP) and V2-skating (V2) skiing techniques. We also assessed the accuracy and the stability of each approach by changing the speed and the incline of the treadmill. A total of 10 cross-country skiers participated in this study. Force measurement bindings, pole force sensors, and an eight-camera Vicon system were used for data collection. The coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) was calculated to evaluate the similarity between the force curves. Mean absolute force differences between the estimated values and the reference value were computed to evaluate the accuracy of each approach. In both DP and V2 techniques, the force–time curves of the forward component of the translational force were similar to the reference value (CMC: 0.832–0.936). The similarity between the force and time curves of the forward component of the ground reaction force (GRF) and the reference value was, however, greater (CMC: 0.879–0.955). Both approaches can estimate the trend of the force–time curve of the propulsive force properly. An approach by calculating the forward component of GRF is a more appropriate method due to a better accuracy.

27 July 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
VLVesa Linnamo
Vesa Linnamo
WRWalter Rapp
Walter Rapp
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger

1 May 1995 in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRoger Bartlett
Roger Bartlett
Erich MüllerErich Müller
Erich Müller
CRChristian Raschner
Christian Raschner
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger
CJCaroline Jordan
Caroline Jordan
The aim of this study was to compare the plantar pressures and forces recorded from both feet of two groups of javelin throwers of different performance levels, in order to investigate differences between skill levels. The study was carried out using an EMED insole system on a Tartan javelin runway at the University of Innsbruck, Austria. Most of the differences (at p < .01) between the two groups were found in the two foot contacts during the delivery stride. Higher maximum total forces (forces on the whole foot) and maximum pressures were recorded for the more skilled or club throwers during the right foot contact at the beginning of this stride. For the left foot landing before release, the club throwers exhibited higher overall maximum forces and overall pressures (the largest forces and pressures recorded on any of the different foot regions) than the novices. The differences between the groups in the medial forefoot region contributed significantly to this result.