Marthe De Boevre

Prof. Dr. Marthe De Boevre

Department of Bioanalysis, Centre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, MYTOX-SOUTH, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2020 in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiesel Claeys
Liesel Claeys
CRChiara Romano
Chiara Romano
KRKarl De Ruyck
Karl De Ruyck
HWHayley Wilson
Hayley Wilson
BFBéatrice Fervers
Béatrice Fervers
Inge HuybrechtsInge Huybrechts
Inge Huybrechts

1 October 2015 in Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKarl De Ruyck
Karl De Ruyck
Marthe De BoevreMarthe De Boevre
Marthe De Boevre
Inge HuybrechtsInge Huybrechts
Inge Huybrechts
Sarah De SaegerSarah De Saeger
Sarah De Saeger

1 April 2013 in Toxicology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marthe De BoevreMarthe De Boevre
Marthe De Boevre
LJLiesbeth Jacxsens
Liesbeth Jacxsens
CLCarl Lachat
Carl Lachat
MEMia Eeckhout
Mia Eeckhout
JMJosé Diana Di Mavungu
José Diana Di Mavungu
Sarah De SaegerSarah De Saeger
Sarah De Saeger

27 February 2012 in Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marthe De BoevreMarthe De Boevre
Marthe De Boevre
JMJ.D. Di Mavungu
J.D. Di Mavungu
PMP. Maene
P. Maene
Kris AudenaertKris Audenaert
Kris Audenaert
DDDieter Deforce
Dieter Deforce
Sarah De SaegerSarah De Saeger
Sarah De Saeger
An LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2-toxin, HT-2-toxin and metabolites, including 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside, α-zearalenol, β-zearalenol, zearalenone-4-glucoside, α-zearalenol-4-glucoside, β-zearalenol-4-glucoside and zearalenone-4-sulfate in maize, wheat, oats, cornflakes and bread. Extraction was performed with acetonitrile/water/acetic acid (79/20/1, v/v/v) followed by a hexane defatting step. After filtration, the extract was evaporated and the residue was redissolved in mobile phase for injection. The mobile phase, which consisted of a mixture of methanol and water with 10 mM ammonium acetate, was adjusted to pH 3 with glacial acetic acid. A sample clean-up procedure was not included because of the low recoveries of free and masked mycotoxins and their differences in polarity. The method allowed the simultaneous determination of 13 Fusarium mycotoxins in a one-step chromatographic run using a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled to a Quattro Premier XE mass spectrometer. The method was validated for several parameters such as linearity, apparent recovery, limit of detection, limit of quantification, precision, expanded measurement uncertainty and specificity. The limits of detection varied from 5 to 13 ng g−1; those for the limit of quantification from 10 to 26 ng g−1. The results of the performance characteristics of the developed LC-MS/MS method were in good agreement with the criteria mentioned in Commission Regulation (EC) No. 401/2006. Thirty samples of a variety of food and feed matrices were sampled and analysed between July 2010 and January 2011.

5 January 2017 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCynthia Adaku Chilaka
Cynthia Adaku Chilaka
Marthe De BoevreMarthe De Boevre
Marthe De Boevre
OAOlusegun Atanda
Olusegun Atanda
Sarah De SaegerSarah De Saeger
Sarah De Saeger
Fusarium fungi are common plant pathogens causing several plant diseases. The presence of these molds in plants exposes crops to toxic secondary metabolites called Fusarium mycotoxins. The most studied Fusarium mycotoxins include fumonisins, zearalenone, and trichothecenes. Studies have highlighted the economic impact of mycotoxins produced by Fusarium. These arrays of toxins have been implicated as the causal agents of wide varieties of toxic health effects in humans and animals ranging from acute to chronic. Global surveillance of Fusarium mycotoxins has recorded significant progress in its control; however, little attention has been paid to Fusarium mycotoxins in sub-Saharan Africa, thus translating to limited occurrence data. In addition, legislative regulation is virtually non-existent. The emergence of modified Fusarium mycotoxins, which may contribute to additional toxic effects, worsens an already precarious situation. This review highlights the status of Fusarium mycotoxins in sub-Saharan Africa, the possible food processing mitigation strategies, as well as future perspectives.

13 February 2019 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVictor Kagot
Victor Kagot
SOSheila Okoth
Sheila Okoth
Marthe De BoevreMarthe De Boevre
Marthe De Boevre
Sarah De SaegerSarah De Saeger
Sarah De Saeger
Fungal contamination and the consequent mycotoxin production is a hindrance to food and feed safety, international trade and human and animal health. In Africa, fungal contamination by Fusarium and Aspergillus is heightened by tropical climatic conditions that create a suitable environment for pre- and postharvest mycotoxin production. The biocontrol of Fusarium and its associated fusariotoxins has stagnated at laboratory and experimental levels with species of Trichoderma, Bacillus and atoxigenic Fusarium being tested as the most promising candidates. Hitherto, there is no impetus to upscale for field use owing to the inconsistent results of these agents. Non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus have been developed to create biocontrol formulations by outcompeting the aflatoxigenic strains, thus thwarting aflatoxins on the target produce by 70% to 90%. Questions have been raised on their ability to produce other mycotoxins like cyclopiazonic acid, to potentially exchange genetic material and to become aflatoxigenic with consequent deleterious effects on other organisms and environments. Other biocontrol approaches to mitigate aflatoxins include the use of lactic acid bacteria and yeast species which have demonstrated the ability to prevent the growth of Aspergillus flavus and consequent toxin production under laboratory conditions. Nevertheless, these strategies seem to be ineffective under field conditions. The efficacy of biological agents is normally dependent on environmental factors, formulations’ safety to non-target hosts and the ecological impact. Biocontrol agents can only be effectively evaluated after long-term use, causing a never-ending debate on the use of live organisms as a remedy to pests and diseases over the use of chemicals. Biocontrol should be used in conjunction with good agricultural practices coupled with good postharvest management to significantly reduce mycotoxins in the African continent.