Soil labile organic carbon fractions (SLOCFs) mainly include microbial biomass carbon (MBC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC) and light fraction organic carbon (LFOC). The link between bedrock exposure rates with SLOCFs and the carbon pool management index under karst rocky desertification has not been well understood. We selected the bedrock exposure rate and vegetation coverage of 30–50% (light bedrock exposure, LBE), 50–70% (moderate bedrock exposure, MBE) and >70% (intense bedrock exposure, IBE) as the experimental sample plots according to the classification standard of karst rocky desertification, and then selected a sample plot of 0–30% (secondary forest, SF) as the control. This study compared the concentrations and stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC) and SLOCFs and analyzed the relevant carbon pool management index on karst landforms at Anshun, S.W. China. The aims were to determine the relationship between bedrock exposure rates and SLOCFs and to identify the most limiting factors for SLOCFs in karst rocky desertification areas. We found that (1) the concentrations and stocks of SLOCFs declined with increasing soil depth. SOC, DOC and MBC showed IBE > LBE > MBE > SF; LFOC decreased with increasing bedrock exposure rate, and EOC did not show obvious regularity. (2) The carbon pool management index and sensitivity index had significant differences under different bedrock exposure rates. Redundancy analysis and linear regression showed that the increase in bedrock exposure rate had a great impact on MBC, DOC, EOC and SOC. In conclusion, the increase of bedrock exposure rate has no side impact on the DOC, EOC and MBC of the soil, but side effects are exhibited by LFOC. Secondary forest improves the integrity of karst landscapes, and does not change the soil properties as well as the concentrations and stocks of SLOCFs in karst rocky desertification areas.

Karst rocky desertification is a common phenomenon in terrestrial ecosystems, and the deterioration of soil quality has a serious side effect on the aboveground vegetation and underground environmental factors. To clarify the variety of soil quality in different rocky desertification grades in typical karst areas of southwest China, the soil quality of four rocky desertification grades was calculated by a single model (SQI: soil quality index), two screening processes (TDS: total dataset and MDS: minimum dataset) and three scoring methods (SSF: standard scoring function, S_L: linear scoring function and S_NL: nonlinear scoring function). The key results are as follows: Significant differences were found in the soil environment factors in non-rocky desertification (NRD), light rocky desertification (LRD) and moderate rocky desertification (MRD) as compared to intense rocky desertification (IRD) (p < 0.01). Except for total potassium (TK), manganese (Mn) and amylase, the other soil environmental factors showed U-shaped changes. In contrast, TK, Mn and amylase increased first and then decreased. Additionally, the SQI based on MDS in SSF, S_L and S_NL was IRD (0.58) > NRD (0.48) > LRD (0.45) > MRD (0.43), IRD (0.53) > NRD (0.42) > LRD (0.39) > MRD (0.36) and IRD (0.57) > NRD (0.47) > MRD (0.42) > LRD (0.40), respectively. However, the SQI was always in the trend of IRD > NRD > MRD > LRD based on the TDS. Overall, although the soil area is scarce, the edaphic properties, enzyme activities and soil quality are not poor in the IRD. Furthermore, we found that S_NL was more suitable for the evaluation of soil quality in the karst rocky desertification area (R² = 0.63, p < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation = 30.69%). This research helps to clarify the variation in soil properties and quality during the succession of rocky desertification and provides guidelines for the sustainable management of soil quality in areas of southwest China.

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper