Giuseppe Ferrazzo

Dr. Giuseppe Ferrazzo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 February 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cesare de GregorioCesare de Gregorio
Cesare de Gregorio
LCLuigi Colarusso
Luigi Colarusso
GCGiuseppe P Calcaterra
Giuseppe P Calcaterra
PBPier Paolo Bassareo
Pier Paolo Bassareo
AIAntonio Ieni
Antonio Ieni
Nicholas KounisNicholas Kounis
Nicholas Kounis
To date, billions of vaccine doses have been administered to restrain the current COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Rare side effects, including intravascular blood clots, were reported in the general population after vaccination. Among these, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) has been considered the most serious one. To shed further light on such an event, we conducted a literature search for case descriptions of CVST in vaccinated people. Findings were analyzed with emphasis on demographic characteristics, type of vaccine, site of thrombosis, clinical and histopathological findings. From 258 potential articles published till September 2021, 41 studies were retrieved for a total of 552 patients. Of these, 492 patients (89.1%) had received AZD1222/Vaxzevria, 45 (8.2%) BNT162b2/CX-024414 Spikevax, 15 (2.7%) JNJ-78436735, and 2 (0.3%) Covishield vaccine. CVST occurred in 382 women and 170 men (mean aged 44 years), and the median timing from the shot was 9 days (range 2–45). Thrombi were predominantly seen in transverse (84%), sigmoid (66%), and/or superior sagittal (56%) sinuses. Brain injury (chiefly intracranial bleeding) occurred in 32% of cases. Of 426 patients with detailed clinical course, 63% were discharged in good clinical conditions, at times with variable neurological sequelae, whereas 37% deceased, largely due to brain injury. This narrative review confirmed CVST as a rare event after (adenoviral vector) COVID-19 vaccination, with a women/men rate ratio of 2.25. Though the pathogenesis of thrombosis is still under discussion, currently available histopathological findings likely indicate an underlying immune vasculitis.

1 April 2026 in Cardiovascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGiuseppe Ferrazzo
Giuseppe Ferrazzo
GLGiulia Laterra
Giulia Laterra
GAGiampiero Avruscio
Giampiero Avruscio
CTCarmen Tirrito
Carmen Tirrito
SRSonia Ragazzo
Sonia Ragazzo
MBMarco Barbanti
Marco Barbanti
The use of excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) has significantly evolved from the mid-1990s to the present, showing substantial improvements in both coronary and peripheral artery interventions. Initially associated with suboptimal outcomes due to low-energy settings and limited techniques, advancements such as high-energy delivery, improved catheter designs, contrast injection protocols, and refined procedural approaches have greatly enhanced clinical efficacy. In coronary applications, ELA has become an established technique for treating intracoronary thrombus, under-expanded stents, in-stent restenosis, and heavily calcified lesions, offering favorable procedural and clinical outcomes with low complication rates. The excimer laser operates through photochemical, photothermal, and photomechanical mechanisms, enabling precise plaque ablation with minimal collateral damage. In peripheral interventions, especially in critical limb ischemia (CLI), ELA has emerged as a viable option for complex, non-crossable lesions and in-stent restenosis, demonstrating high technical success, improved patency, and promising limb salvage rates. Multiple clinical trials and registries support the safety and effectiveness of ELA, particularly in high-risk patient populations. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and practical considerations on the use of excimer laser atherectomy in coronary and peripheral interventions.