Aim: To establish whether the addition of probiotics to a globally accepted Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-eradication scheme may reduce the rates of side effects and increase the eradication rates. Methods. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients receiving eradication therapy for H. pylori in the eight participating centers. All patients received a 10-day proton pump inhibitor containing non-bismuth quadruple therapeutic regimen for H. pylori eradication (omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg all twice daily orally) and were randomized to receive either probiotics (group A) or placebo (group B). The probiotic used combined four probiotic strains, i.e., Lactobacillus Acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Saccharomyces boulardii. Results. Data were analyzed for 329 patients in group A and 335 patients in group B. Fifty six (17.0%) patients in group A and 170 (50.7%) patients in group B reported the occurrence of an H. pylori treatment-associated new symptom or the aggravation of a pre-existing symptom of any severity (p < 0.00001). H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 303 patients in group A (92.0%) and 291 patients in group B (86.8%), (p = 0.028). Conclusion: Adding probiotics to the 10-day concomitant non-bismuth quadruple H. pylori eradication regimen increases the eradication rate and decreases side effects.

Introduction: Optimizing treatment with biological agents is an ideal goal for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent data suggest that mucosal inflammation patterns and serum cytokine profiles differ between patients who respond and those who do not. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, has shown promise, but predicting treatment response remains a challenge. We aimed to identify prognostic markers of response to ustekinumab in patients with active UC, utilizing information from their mucosal transcriptome. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study of 36 UC patients initiating treatment with ustekinumab. Colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained before treatment initiation for a gene expression analysis using a microarray panel of 84 inflammatory genes. A differential gene expression analysis (DGEA), correlation analysis, and network centrality analysis on co-expression networks were performed to identify potential biomarkers. Additionally, machine learning (ML) models were employed to predict treatment response based on gene expression data. Results: Seven genes, including BCL6, CXCL5, and FASLG, were significantly upregulated, while IL23A and IL23R were downregulated in non-responders compared to responders. The co-expression analysis revealed distinct patterns between responders and non-responders, with key genes like BCL6 and CRP highlighted in responders and CCL11 and CCL22 in non-responders. The ML algorithms demonstrated a high predictive power, emphasizing the significance of the IL23R, IL23A, and BCL6 genes. Conclusions: Our study identifies potential biomarkers associated with ustekinumab response in UC patients, shedding light on its underlying mechanisms and variability in treatment outcomes. Integrating transcriptomic approaches, including gene expression analyses and ML, offers valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies and highlights avenues for further research to enhance therapeutic outcomes for patients with UC.

Background/Objectives: Ustekinumab has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Real-world data regarding its efficacy and the discovery of predictive factors of response need to be studied further. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and identify predictors of response to induction treatment with ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Clinical response (CR) at week 16 was the primary endpoint, and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCRem) and endoscopic response were the secondary endpoints. Baseline histology, mucosal gene expression, and pharmacokinetics were studied for their effect on response to treatment. Results: We included 123 patients (mean age = 50.3 years). CR was recorded in 70.8% (75/106), SFCRem in 48% (59/123), endoscopic improvement in 71.4% (40/56), and mucosal healing in 28.6% (16/56). Higher PRO-stool frequency (OR = 0.49, p = 0.027), concomitant use of 5-ASA (OR = 3.69, p = 0.021), platelet number of ≥284 × 10⁹/L (OR = 6.52, p = 0.001) at baseline, and a drop in the total count of platelets by 10⁸/L (OR = 1.23, p = 0.022) at week 8 were independently associated with CR. Elevated trough levels of ustekinumab at week 16 were associated with a higher probability of endoscopic improvement (median difference = 3784 ng/mL, p = 0.013), with an optimal cut-off value of 3500 ng/mL (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66–0.96). Increased mucosal mRNA expression for IL-23 (p = 0.007) and IL-23R (p = 0.031) at baseline was associated with increased probability of CR. Higher continuous Geboes scores at baseline were associated with a lower probability of CR (OR = 0.80, p = 0.045), with an optimal cut-off value of 14 (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57–0.93). Conclusions: Clinical, laboratory, and molecular markers may identify patients with ulcerative colitis who are more likely to respond to ustekinumab.