Donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a negative impact on kidney graft survival. Therefore, we analyzed the occurrence of DSA and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in patients from two prospective randomized trials in our center. At 3–4.5 months posttransplant 127 patients were randomized to continue cyclosporine or converted to everolimus therapy. The presence of DSA was prospectively assessed using Luminex assays. AMR was defined according to the Banff 2009 classification. Antibody screening was available in 126 patients with a median follow‐up of 1059 days. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) patients on cyclosporine developed DSA after a median of 991 days. In comparison, 14/61 patients (23.0%) randomized to everolimus developed DSA after 551 days (log‐rank: p = 0.048). Eight patients on everolimus compared to two patients on cyclosporine developed AMR (log‐rank: p = 0.036). Four of 10 patients with AMR—all in the everolimus group—lost their graft. A multivariate regression model revealed everolimus, >3 mismatches and living donor as significant risk factors for DSA. Acute rejection within the first year, >3 mismatches, everolimus and living donor were independent risk factors for AMR. This single center analysis demonstrates for the first time that everolimus‐based immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk for the development of DSA and AMR.

Transplant recipients exhibit an impaired protective immunity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, potentially caused by mycophenolate (MPA) immunosuppression. Recent data from patients with autoimmune disorders suggest that temporary MPA hold might greatly improve booster vaccination outcomes. We applied a fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to 29 kidney transplant recipients during a temporary (5 weeks) MPA/azathioprine hold, who had not mounted a humoral immune response to previous vaccinations. Seroconversion until day 32 after vaccination was observed in 76% of patients, associated with acquisition of virus-neutralizing capacity. Interestingly, 21/25 (84%) calcineurin inhibitor–treated patients responded, but only 1/4 belatacept-treated patients responded. In line with humoral responses, counts and relative frequencies of spike receptor binding domain–specific (RBD-specific) B cells were markedly increased on day 7 after vaccination, with an increase in RBD-specific CD27 ⁺⁺ CD38 ⁺ plasmablasts. Whereas overall proportions of spike-reactive CD4 ⁺ T cells remained unaltered after the fourth dose, frequencies were positively correlated with specific IgG levels. Importantly, antigen-specific proliferating Ki67 ⁺ and in vivo–activated programmed cell death 1–positive T cells significantly increased after revaccination during MPA hold, whereas cytokine production and memory differentiation remained unaffected. In summary, antimetabolite hold augmented all arms of immunity during booster vaccination. These data suggest further studies of antimetabolite hold in kidney transplant recipients.

Mortality from COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is high, and their response to three vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 is strongly impaired. We retrospectively analyzed the serological response of up to five doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in KTR from 27 December 2020 until 31 December 2021. Particularly, the influence of the different dose adjustment regimens for mycophenolic acid (MPA) on serological response to fourth vaccination was analyzed. In total, 4277 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 in 1478 patients were analyzed. Serological response was 19.5% after 1203 basic immunizations, and increased to 29.4%, 55.6%, and 57.5% in response to 603 third, 250 fourth, and 40 fifth vaccinations, resulting in a cumulative response rate of 88.7%. In patients with calcineurin inhibitor and MPA maintenance immunosuppression, pausing MPA and adding 5 mg prednisolone equivalent before the fourth vaccination increased the serological response rate to 75% in comparison to the no dose adjustment (52%) or dose reduction (46%). Belatacept-treated patients had a response rate of 8.7% (4/46) after three vaccinations and 12.5% (3/25) after four vaccinations. Except for belatacept-treated patients, repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of up to five times effectively induces serological response in kidney transplant recipients. It can be enhanced by pausing MPA at the time of vaccination.

Background. Patients with blood group O have disadvantages in the allocation of deceased donor organs in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System and fewer ABO-compatible living donors. In order to investigate the consequences of this dilemma, we analysed the outcome of patients with blood group O in our transplantation programme. Methods. A single-centre analysis of 1186 waitlisted patients for first deceased donor kidney transplantations between 1996 and 2008 was performed, and the mechanisms of blood group-dependant differences for graft and recipient outcome were assessed. Results. Median follow-up time until death or end of observation for all waitlisted patients was 66 months (range, 0–158 months) and for 589 recipients of a kidney graft was 61 months (range, 0–158 months). Patients with blood group O had significantly longer waiting times for deceased donor kidney grafts, compared to non-group O recipients (median waiting time, 85 vs 59 months). As a consequence, blood group O patients had an increased risk for death without transplantation (13.1% for O patients vs 9.6% for non-O patients; P < 0.05). Despite a good human leukocyte antigen match, graft outcome tended to be worse in O recipients; 14.1% (95% CI, 8.2–19.9%) of all O kidneys from deceased donors were transplanted into non-O recipients, leading to the accumulation of O recipients on the waiting list. Conclusions. The export of blood group O donor kidneys to other blood groups leads to longer waiting times, to a higher death rate and to accumulation of blood group O patients on the waiting list, which will further aggravate the problem in the future. Our results should prompt further research on the issues associated with blood group O. Current allocation systems and living donor kidney exchange programmes should be re-evaluated to address this problem.

Currently, no international standard for the pre‐transplant evaluation of living donor renal function exists. Following a standardized questionnaire on current practice in all Eurotransplant (ET) centers, we compared a new CT‐based technique to measure renal cortex volume with our standard of DTPA‐clearance combined with MAG3‐scintigraphy (DTPA × MAG3) and with creatinine‐based methods in 167 consecutive living kidney donors. Most ET centers use creatinine‐clearance (64%) to measure total renal function and radioistopic methods (82%) to assess split renal function. Before transplantation, CT‐measured total cortex volume (r = 0.67; P < 0.001) and estimated GFR using the Cockcroft‐Gault formula [eGFR(CG)] (r = 0.55; P < 0.001) showed the strongest correlation with DTPA‐clearance. In contrast, the correlation between DTPA‐clearance and creatinine clearance was weak (r = 0.21; P = 0.02). A strong correlation was observed between CT‐measured split cortex volume and MAG3‐measured split renal function (r = 0.93; P < 0.001). A strong correlation was also found between pre‐transplant split renal function assessed by eGFR(CG) together with cortex volume measurement and post‐transplant eGFR(CG) of both, the donor (r = 0.83; P < 0.001) and the recipient (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). In conclusion CT‐based assessment of renal cortex volume bears the potential to substitute existing methods to assess pre‐transplant living donor split renal function.

Anaemia is a frequent problem after renal transplantation, which may appear as hypo‐regenerative anaemia (due to myelotoxic drugs or infectious agents and/or poor graft function) or hyper‐regenerative anaemia (haemolysis or bleeding). It, therefore, seems reasonable to distinguish between different underlying causes of anaemia according to reticulocyte counts.