Donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a negative impact on kidney graft survival. Therefore, we analyzed the occurrence of DSA and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in patients from two prospective randomized trials in our center. At 3–4.5 months posttransplant 127 patients were randomized to continue cyclosporine or converted to everolimus therapy. The presence of DSA was prospectively assessed using Luminex assays. AMR was defined according to the Banff 2009 classification. Antibody screening was available in 126 patients with a median follow‐up of 1059 days. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) patients on cyclosporine developed DSA after a median of 991 days. In comparison, 14/61 patients (23.0%) randomized to everolimus developed DSA after 551 days (log‐rank: p = 0.048). Eight patients on everolimus compared to two patients on cyclosporine developed AMR (log‐rank: p = 0.036). Four of 10 patients with AMR—all in the everolimus group—lost their graft. A multivariate regression model revealed everolimus, >3 mismatches and living donor as significant risk factors for DSA. Acute rejection within the first year, >3 mismatches, everolimus and living donor were independent risk factors for AMR. This single center analysis demonstrates for the first time that everolimus‐based immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk for the development of DSA and AMR.

Significance Statement: There is no proven effective treatment for a major cause of graft failure, late antibody-mediated rejection, but IL-6, a cytokine known to promote B cell immunity, may be a promising therapeutic target. The authors describe the results of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial involving 20 patients, designed to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint analysis) of an anti–IL-6 antibody, clazakizumab, versus placebo in late antibody-mediated rejection. Although the occurrence of serious infections and diverticulitis presented important safety signals, clazakizumab was associated with an early decrease in donor-specific antibody levels, modulated antibody-mediated rejection activity, and slowed the decline of renal function. Preliminary efficacy results suggest a potentially beneficial effect of clazakizumab and may therefore support the design of larger trials with a longer duration of follow-up. Background: Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of transplant failure. Blocking IL-6 has been proposed as a promising therapeutic strategy. Methods: We performed a phase 2 randomized pilot trial to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint analysis) of the anti–IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late ABMR. The trial included 20 kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific, antibody-positive ABMR ≥365 days post-transplantation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 25 mg clazakizumab or placebo (4-weekly subcutaneous injections) for 12 weeks (part A), followed by a 40-week open-label extension (part B), during which time all participants received clazakizumab. Results: Five (25%) patients under active treatment developed serious infectious events, and two (10%) developed diverticular disease complications, leading to trial withdrawal. Those receiving clazakizumab displayed significantly decreased donor-specific antibodies and, on prolonged treatment, modulated rejection-related gene-expression patterns. In 18 patients, allograft biopsies after 51 weeks revealed a negative molecular ABMR score in seven (38.9%), disappearance of capillary C4d deposits in five (27.8%), and resolution of morphologic ABMR activity in four (22.2%). Although proteinuria remained stable, the mean eGFR decline during part A was slower with clazakizumab compared with placebo (−0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], −1.96 to 0.03 versus −2.43; 95% CI, −3.40 to −1.46 ml/min per 1.73 m² per month, respectively, P=0.04). During part B, the slope of eGFR decline for patients who were switched from placebo to clazakizumab improved and no longer differed significantly from patients initially allocated to clazakizumab. Conclusions: Although safety data indicate the need for careful patient selection and monitoring, our preliminary efficacy results suggest a potentially beneficial effect of clazakizumab on ABMR activity and progression.

Significance Statement: Stagnating long-term outcomes are a persistent obstacle for the transplant community, but surprisingly, large contemporary studies investigating the causes of graft failure are rare. However, it is obvious that a thorough analysis of graft failures is the first step to improve outcomes. A study that is on the basis of a database designed and implemented for kidney transplant recipients over 20 years ago and an active effort to keep allograft recipients in the post-transplant care program reveals previously overlooked information that leads to insights into the complexity of allograft failure. These include the effect of T cell–mediated rejection, the role of antibody-mediated rejection in late graft failure, and the influence of recipient age on the causes of graft failure. Background: Few studies have thoroughly investigated the causes of kidney graft loss (GL), despite its importance. Methods: A novel approach assigns each persistent and relevant decline in renal function over the lifetime of a renal allograft to a standardized category, hypothesizing that singular or multiple events finally lead to GL. An adjudication committee of three physicians retrospectively evaluated indication biopsies, laboratory testing, and medical history of all 303 GLs among all 1642 recipients of transplants between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2017 at a large university hospital to assign primary and/or secondary causes of GL. Results: In 51.2% of the patients, more than one cause contributed to GL. The most frequent primary or secondary causes leading to graft failure were intercurrent medical events in 36.3% of graft failures followed by T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) in 34% and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in 30.7%. In 77.9%, a primary cause could be attributed to GL, of which ABMR was most frequent (21.5%). Many causes for GL were identified, and predominant causes for GL varied over time. Conclusions: GL is often multifactorial and more complex than previously thought.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity, is usually administered as a standard dose of 1 g b.i.d. after renal transplantation. Because MMF dose reductions are associated with inferior outcome, we investigated pre-transplant IMPDH activity, MMF dose reductions and outcome. IMPDH activity was determined in isolated peripheral mononuclear cells immediately prior to renal transplantation. We observed considerable inter-individual variability in pre-transplant IMPDH activity (9.35 ± 4.22 nmol/mg/h). Thirty of 48 patients (62.5%) with standard MMF dose (1 g b.i.d.) had dose reductions within 3 years post-transplant; these patients also had significantly lower IMPDH activity. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) for prediction of dose reduction within 6 months post-transplant was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61–0.89; p < 0.004). IMPDH activity above the cut-off value, MMF dose reduction and age of recipient were significant contributors for the occurrence of acute rejection in the multivariate logistic regression. Patients with high IMPDH activity and MMF dose reduction had the highest rejection rate (81.8% vs. 36.4%; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with low IMPDH activity experienced more complications of MMF therapy. High pre-transplant IMPDH activity and MMF dose reductions were associated with rejection. Determination of IMPDH activity prior to transplantation may help to improve MMF therapy after renal transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) following kidney transplantation is associated with poor allograft survival. Conventional treatment based on plasmapheresis (PPH) and the administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) is not satisfactory. Two compounds, more specifically targeting B cells and plasma cells, may help to improve the prognosis: rituximab, a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, and bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor causing apoptosis of plasma cells. Starting in February 2009, we treated 10 consecutive patients with ABMR according to current Banff criteria with one cycle of bortezomib [1.3 mg/m ² intravenously (i.v.), Day 1, 4, 8, 11]. This group was compared to a historical control group of patients ( n = 9) treated with a fixed single dose of rituximab (500 mg i.v.). All patients received PPH (6×) and IVIG (30 g). Patients with acute ABMR additionally received methylprednisolone (3 × 500 mg i.v.). Patient survival in both groups was 100%. At 18 months after treatment, graft survival was 6/10 in the bortezomib group as compared to 1/9 functioning grafts in the rituximab group (P = 0.071). Renal function was superior in patients treated with bortezomib as compared to rituximab-treated patients (serum creatinine at 9 months: 2.5 ± 0.6 versus 5.1 ± 2.1 mg/dL, P = 0.008). Proteinuria was not different between both groups (9 months: 1.3 ± 1.0 versus 1.6 ± 1.6 g/day, P = n.s.). Treatment of ABMR with bortezomib in addition to standard therapy was partially effective, whereas treatment with a fixed dose of rituximab in addition to standard therapy with PPH and IVIG did not result in sufficient long-term graft survival. In the future, new strategies including the combination of both substances and the application of higher doses must be discussed.

So far, the combined influence of donor age and recipient age on renal allograft survival has not been investigated sufficiently. In this retrospective single-centre study we analysed whether the influence of donor age and recipient age on renal allograft survival are dependent on each other. Data from 1269 cadaveric renal allograft transplantations were evaluated. Paediatric donors (55 years, n=176), young recipients (yr, 55 years, n=211). Functional and actual long-term graft survival (8 years) within the four resulting groups was determined: yd/yr (n=926), yd/or (n=167), od/yr (n=132), and od/or (n=44). Univariate analysis showed that long-term graft survival of both, kidneys from young donors (functional, 66.1 vs 52.2%, P=0.004; actual, 53.3 vs 46.2%, P=0.065) and kidneys from old donors (functional, 68.7 vs 22.5%, P=0.07; actual, 57.1 vs 20.8%, P=0.15) was better in old recipients as compared to young recipients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that actual graft survival of kidneys from old donors was significantly reduced in young recipients (od/yr) as compared to all other groups (P=0.001; RR, 1. 97; 95% CI, 1.32-2.94). In this group of patients, graft loss was mainly due to acute (33.7%) and chronic (24.0%) rejection. Transplantation of kidneys from 'old' donors into 'young' recipients should be avoided, and these kidneys should be given to age-matched recipients.