Abdul Waheed

Dr. Abdul Waheed

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 July 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
AWAbdul Waheed
Abdul Waheed
Nabin R KarkiNabin R Karki
Nabin R Karki
NANawaraj Adhikari
Nawaraj Adhikari
HMHector Mesa
Hector Mesa
Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Most GISTs originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), the pacemaker cell situated between the circular and longitudinal layers of the muscularis propria along the GI tract. In this population-based study using the SEER database, we sought to identify demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors that affect the prognosis and survival of patients with this neoplasm. Molecular genetic advances, current management guidelines, and advances in targeted therapy are discussed. Methods: Demographic and clinical data from GIST patients were retrieved from the SEER research plus database for the period 2000–2018. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS® v20.2 software using the Chi-square test, paired t-test, multivariate analysis, and Kaplan–Meier functions. Results: A total of 10,833 patients with GIST were identified. Most patients were between 60–74 years of age: 40%, Caucasian: 68%, and the male to female ratio was 1.1:1. The most common primary tumor sites were stomach: 63%, small intestine: 30%, rectum: 3%, and esophagus: 0.7%. When reported, the grade of differentiation was well: 38%, moderately: 32%, undifferentiated: 19%, poorly: 12%. The size of most tumors ranged between 6–10 cm: 36% and they were treated by surgical intervention: 82% and/or chemotherapy/targeted therapy: 39%. The stage was localized: 66%, advanced: 19%, and regional: 15%. The 5-year survival was 74% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 72.6–74.7), and the 5-year cause-specific survival 82% (95% CI = 80.7–82.6). The 5-year cause-specific survival by treatment included surgery at 86% (95% CI = 85.4–87.3), chemotherapy/targeted therapy with or without surgery at 77% (95% CI = 75.7–78.9), and radiation at 75% (95% CI = 74.5–80). On multivariable analysis tumor size > 5 cm, poorly and undifferentiated grade, age > 60, and distant metastases at presentation were associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: GISTs comprise 1–2% of malignancies of the GI tract, usually affect male Caucasians between the ages of 60 and 74 years, most tumors occur in the stomach and small intestine, and are usually >5 cm, but still localized, at the time of diagnosis. Most tumors receive multimodality surgical and chemotherapy/targeted therapy treatment, with a 5-year overall survival of 74% and cause-specific survival of 82%. GIST patients would benefit from enrollment in large clinical trials to establish better therapy guidelines for unresectable, treatment-refractory, and recurrent tumors.

10 March 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
AWAbdul Waheed
Abdul Waheed
NSNitasha Sharma
Nitasha Sharma
EPElizabeth K. Pryor
Elizabeth K. Pryor
NKNagla Abdel Karim
Nagla Abdel Karim
Introduction: Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is an extremely rare entity, with a frequency of 0.005% of all malignancies. Most data related to this rare disease are limited to case series and a few database studies. We present a large database study that aims to investigate the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors, prognosis, and survival of PC. Methods: Data of parathyroid carcinoma were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) diagnosed between 1975 and 2016. Results: PC had a slightly higher incidence in men (52.2%, p < 0.005), the majority of cases affected Caucasians (75.4%, p < 0.005), and the mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. Histologically, 99.7% were adenocarcinomas not otherwise specified (p < 0.005), well-differentiated (p < 0.005), and 2–4 cm (p < 0.001) in size among the patients with available data. In cases with staging provided, most PC were organ-confined (36.8%, p < 0.001). Lymph nodes were positive in 25.2% of cases where lymph node status was reported. The main treatment modality was surgery (97.2%), followed by radiation alone (2%), and very few received chemotherapy alone (0.8%), p < 0.005. Five-year follow-up was available for 82.7% of the cases. Those who underwent surgery only or radiation alone had 5-year survivals of 83.8% and 72.2%, respectively (p < 0.037). Multivariable analysis identified tumor size >4 cm, age > 40 years, male sex, Caucasian race, distant spread, and poorly differentiated grade as independent risk factors for mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusion: PC is a very rare tumor mostly affecting Caucasian individuals in the fifth decade. Older age, poor histologic differentiation, and distant metastasis are associated with a worse prognosis. Surgical resection offers the best survival outcome. To better understand the pathogenesis and factors affecting survival, all PC patients should be enrolled in national and international registries.

14 February 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
AWAbdul Waheed
Abdul Waheed
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
AMAnkita Mishra
Ankita Mishra
BTBisma Tareen
Bisma Tareen
NKNagla Abdel Karim
Nagla Abdel Karim
Background: Primary peritoneal mesothelioma (PPM) is a rare and aggressive tumor arising from the visceral and parietal peritoneum. The diagnosis and treatment of PPM are often delayed because of non-specific clinical presentation, and the prognosis is worse. The current study investigated the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting patient prognosis and survival in PPM. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of 1998 patients with PPM were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975–2016). The chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: The majority of PPM patients were male (56.2%, p < 0.005) and Caucasian (90.4%, p < 0.005, with a mean age of diagnosis was 69 ± 13 years. The grading, histological, and tumor size information were classified as “Unknown” in most of the cases, but when available, poorly differentiated tumors (8.7%), malignant mesothelioma, not otherwise specified (63.4%) and tumors > 4 cm in size (8%), respectively, were most common, p < 0.005. Chemotherapy was administered to 50.6% of patients, followed by resection (29.2%) and radiation (1.5%), p < 0.001. The cohort of PPM had a five-year overall survival of 20.3% (±1.1), compared to 43.5% (±5.9), 25.9% (± 8.4), and 18.7% (±1.6) for those with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy alone, respectively. Poor differentiation (OR = 4.2, CI = 3.3–4.9), tumor size > 4 cm (OR = 3.9, CI = 3.2–4.5), Caucasian race (OR = 2.9, CI = 2.6–4.4), and distant SEER stage (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.1–3.2) were all linked with increased mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusion: An extremely rare and aggressive peritoneal tumor, PPM may be difficult to identify at the time of diagnosis. Radiation therapy likely to have a limited function in the treatment of this condition, with surgery and chemotherapy being the primary choices. All PPM patients should be enrolled in a nationwide registry to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and identify factors affecting survival.

24 August 2022 in Clinics and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
SPSteven Kyle Pulliam
Steven Kyle Pulliam
Nabin R KarkiNabin R Karki
Nabin R Karki
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
SJSana Jogezai
Sana Jogezai
NKNagla Abdel Karim
Nagla Abdel Karim
Programmed death-ligand (PD-L) 1 and 2 are ligands of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor. They are members of the B7/CD28 ligand-receptor family and the most investigated inhibitory immune checkpoints at present. PD-L1 is the main effector in PD-1-reliant immunosuppression, as the PD-1/PD-L pathway is a key regulator for T-cell activation. Activation of T-cells warrants the upregulation of PD-1 and production of cytokines which also upregulate PD-L1 expression, creating a positive feedback mechanism that has an important role in the prevention of tissue destruction and development of autoimmunity. In the context of inadequate immune response, the prolonged antigen stimulation leads to chronic PD-1 upregulation and T-cell exhaustion. In lung cancer patients, PD-L1 expression levels have been of special interest since patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) demonstrate higher levels of expression and tend to respond more favorably to the evolving PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, alone as front-line single-agent therapy instead of chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥1% expression and chemoimmunotherapy regimens are available for lower stage disease. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines also delineate treatment by low and high expression of PD-L1 in NSCLC. Thus, studying PD-L1 overexpression levels in the different histological subtypes of lung cancer can affect our approach to treating these patients. There is an evolving role of immunotherapy in the other sub-types of lung cancer, especially small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In addition, within the NSCLC category, squamous cell carcinomas and non-G12C KRAS mutant NSCLC have no specific targetable therapies to date. Therefore, assessment of the PD-L1 expression level among these subtypes of lung cancer is required, since lung cancer is one of the few malignances wherein PD-L1 expression levels is so crucial in determining the role of immunotherapy. In this study, we compared PD-L1 expression in lung cancer according to the histological subtype of the tumor.

14 April 2024 in Clinical and Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AYAbdul Qahar Khan Yasinzai
Abdul Qahar Khan Yasinzai
BTBisma Tareen
Bisma Tareen
KTKatharine Tracy
Katharine Tracy
NJNimra Jamil
Nimra Jamil
MKMarjan Khan
Marjan Khan
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah

17 December 2021 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMuhammad S. Panezai
Muhammad S. Panezai
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
KBKalyani Ballur
Kalyani Ballur
LGLauren Gilstrap
Lauren Gilstrap
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
FCFredrerick D Cason
Fredrerick D Cason
Introduction: Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated disease caused by ingesting gluten-containing foods and is characterized mainly by malabsorptive diarrhea. Furthermore, distinguishing between mild disease and asymptomatic individuals is critical and necessitates a high level of clinical suspicion. Short stature, delayed puberty, bone abnormalities, neurological problems, and intestinal cancer can all be consequences of a delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of celiac disease among our community's recurrent diarrhea patients. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study aimed at determining the frequency of celiac disease in patients with chronic diarrhea. One hundred eighty-eight patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years who had chronic diarrhea lasting greater than three months were enrolled in this study. Stratification was utilized to control for modifiers. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 74.5% of patients (n=140) were male, while 25.5% (n=48) were female with a mean age of 38.48±10.85 years. The average duration of celiac disease symptoms was 8.17± 3.75 months. Celiac disease was found in 12.2% (n=23) of the individuals. Also, 21% of individuals with a positive family history of CD devolved CD, compared to those without prior CD family history (p=0.01). Conclusions: In individuals with chronic diarrhea for more than three months, the prevalence of celiac disease was determined to be 12.2% (n=23). There was a statistically significant difference between those with a positive family history of CD and those who did not have the condition.