Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Most GISTs originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), the pacemaker cell situated between the circular and longitudinal layers of the muscularis propria along the GI tract. In this population-based study using the SEER database, we sought to identify demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors that affect the prognosis and survival of patients with this neoplasm. Molecular genetic advances, current management guidelines, and advances in targeted therapy are discussed. Methods: Demographic and clinical data from GIST patients were retrieved from the SEER research plus database for the period 2000–2018. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS^® v20.2 software using the Chi-square test, paired t-test, multivariate analysis, and Kaplan–Meier functions. Results: A total of 10,833 patients with GIST were identified. Most patients were between 60–74 years of age: 40%, Caucasian: 68%, and the male to female ratio was 1.1:1. The most common primary tumor sites were stomach: 63%, small intestine: 30%, rectum: 3%, and esophagus: 0.7%. When reported, the grade of differentiation was well: 38%, moderately: 32%, undifferentiated: 19%, poorly: 12%. The size of most tumors ranged between 6–10 cm: 36% and they were treated by surgical intervention: 82% and/or chemotherapy/targeted therapy: 39%. The stage was localized: 66%, advanced: 19%, and regional: 15%. The 5-year survival was 74% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 72.6–74.7), and the 5-year cause-specific survival 82% (95% CI = 80.7–82.6). The 5-year cause-specific survival by treatment included surgery at 86% (95% CI = 85.4–87.3), chemotherapy/targeted therapy with or without surgery at 77% (95% CI = 75.7–78.9), and radiation at 75% (95% CI = 74.5–80). On multivariable analysis tumor size > 5 cm, poorly and undifferentiated grade, age > 60, and distant metastases at presentation were associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: GISTs comprise 1–2% of malignancies of the GI tract, usually affect male Caucasians between the ages of 60 and 74 years, most tumors occur in the stomach and small intestine, and are usually >5 cm, but still localized, at the time of diagnosis. Most tumors receive multimodality surgical and chemotherapy/targeted therapy treatment, with a 5-year overall survival of 74% and cause-specific survival of 82%. GIST patients would benefit from enrollment in large clinical trials to establish better therapy guidelines for unresectable, treatment-refractory, and recurrent tumors.

Introduction: Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is an extremely rare entity, with a frequency of 0.005% of all malignancies. Most data related to this rare disease are limited to case series and a few database studies. We present a large database study that aims to investigate the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors, prognosis, and survival of PC. Methods: Data of parathyroid carcinoma were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) diagnosed between 1975 and 2016. Results: PC had a slightly higher incidence in men (52.2%, p < 0.005), the majority of cases affected Caucasians (75.4%, p < 0.005), and the mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. Histologically, 99.7% were adenocarcinomas not otherwise specified (p < 0.005), well-differentiated (p < 0.005), and 2–4 cm (p < 0.001) in size among the patients with available data. In cases with staging provided, most PC were organ-confined (36.8%, p < 0.001). Lymph nodes were positive in 25.2% of cases where lymph node status was reported. The main treatment modality was surgery (97.2%), followed by radiation alone (2%), and very few received chemotherapy alone (0.8%), p < 0.005. Five-year follow-up was available for 82.7% of the cases. Those who underwent surgery only or radiation alone had 5-year survivals of 83.8% and 72.2%, respectively (p < 0.037). Multivariable analysis identified tumor size >4 cm, age > 40 years, male sex, Caucasian race, distant spread, and poorly differentiated grade as independent risk factors for mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusion: PC is a very rare tumor mostly affecting Caucasian individuals in the fifth decade. Older age, poor histologic differentiation, and distant metastasis are associated with a worse prognosis. Surgical resection offers the best survival outcome. To better understand the pathogenesis and factors affecting survival, all PC patients should be enrolled in national and international registries.

Background: Salivary gland neoplasms are uncommon in both pediatric and adult populations. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is one of the most common salivary gland tumors and usually presents with atypical clinical features. This study sought to evaluate the demographic and clinical factors affecting outcomes in adults and pediatric populations with MEC that could be used to risk stratification for treatment selection and clinical trial enrollment. Methods: Data on 4507 MEC patients were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database (2000–2018). Patients aged ≤ 18 years were classified into the pediatric population, and those older than 18 years were placed in the adult group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were created to analyze survival probabilities for various independent factors. Results: The pediatric population comprised 3.7% of the entire cohort, with a predominance of females (51.5%), while the adult population constituted 96.3% of the cohort, with a predominance of female patients (52.2%). Caucasians were the predominant race overall (75.3%), while more African Americans were seen in the pediatric group. In tumor size of <2 cm overall, poorly differentiated tumors with higher metastasis rates were observed more in adults (11.3% and 9.3%) than in the pediatric population (3.0% and 4.8%, p < 0.05). Surgical resection was the most common treatment option (53.9%), making up 63.6% of the pediatric and 53.5% of the adult groups. A combination of surgical resection and radiation was used in 29.8% of the entire cohort while a combination of surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy made up only 3.2%. The pediatric group had a lower overall mortality rate (5.5%) than the adult group (28.6%). Females had a higher 5-year survival rate in comparison to males (86.5%, and 73.7%, respectively). Surgical resection led to a more prolonged overall survival and 5-year cancer-specific survival (98.4% (C.I, 93.7–99.6) in the pediatric group and 88.8% (C.I, 87.5–90.0) in the adult group), respectively. Metastasis to the lung, bone, brain, and/or liver was found to have significantly lower survival rates. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that adults (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.4), Asian or Pacific Islander (HR = 0.5), male (HR = 0.8), poorly differentiated histology (HR = 3.8), undifferentiated histology (HR = 4.5), regional spread (HR = 2.1), and distant spread (HR = 3.2) were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands primarily affects Whites and is more aggressive in adults than in the pediatric population. Even with surgical resection, the overall survival is poor in the adult population as compared to its pediatric counterparts. Advanced age, larger tumor size, male sex, and lymph node invasion are associated with increased mortality.

Background: Primary peritoneal mesothelioma (PPM) is a rare and aggressive tumor arising from the visceral and parietal peritoneum. The diagnosis and treatment of PPM are often delayed because of non-specific clinical presentation, and the prognosis is worse. The current study investigated the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting patient prognosis and survival in PPM. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of 1998 patients with PPM were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975–2016). The chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: The majority of PPM patients were male (56.2%, p < 0.005) and Caucasian (90.4%, p < 0.005, with a mean age of diagnosis was 69 ± 13 years. The grading, histological, and tumor size information were classified as “Unknown” in most of the cases, but when available, poorly differentiated tumors (8.7%), malignant mesothelioma, not otherwise specified (63.4%) and tumors > 4 cm in size (8%), respectively, were most common, p < 0.005. Chemotherapy was administered to 50.6% of patients, followed by resection (29.2%) and radiation (1.5%), p < 0.001. The cohort of PPM had a five-year overall survival of 20.3% (±1.1), compared to 43.5% (±5.9), 25.9% (± 8.4), and 18.7% (±1.6) for those with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy alone, respectively. Poor differentiation (OR = 4.2, CI = 3.3–4.9), tumor size > 4 cm (OR = 3.9, CI = 3.2–4.5), Caucasian race (OR = 2.9, CI = 2.6–4.4), and distant SEER stage (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.1–3.2) were all linked with increased mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusion: An extremely rare and aggressive peritoneal tumor, PPM may be difficult to identify at the time of diagnosis. Radiation therapy likely to have a limited function in the treatment of this condition, with surgery and chemotherapy being the primary choices. All PPM patients should be enrolled in a nationwide registry to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and identify factors affecting survival.

Programmed death-ligand (PD-L) 1 and 2 are ligands of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor. They are members of the B7/CD28 ligand-receptor family and the most investigated inhibitory immune checkpoints at present. PD-L1 is the main effector in PD-1-reliant immunosuppression, as the PD-1/PD-L pathway is a key regulator for T-cell activation. Activation of T-cells warrants the upregulation of PD-1 and production of cytokines which also upregulate PD-L1 expression, creating a positive feedback mechanism that has an important role in the prevention of tissue destruction and development of autoimmunity. In the context of inadequate immune response, the prolonged antigen stimulation leads to chronic PD-1 upregulation and T-cell exhaustion. In lung cancer patients, PD-L1 expression levels have been of special interest since patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) demonstrate higher levels of expression and tend to respond more favorably to the evolving PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, alone as front-line single-agent therapy instead of chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥1% expression and chemoimmunotherapy regimens are available for lower stage disease. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines also delineate treatment by low and high expression of PD-L1 in NSCLC. Thus, studying PD-L1 overexpression levels in the different histological subtypes of lung cancer can affect our approach to treating these patients. There is an evolving role of immunotherapy in the other sub-types of lung cancer, especially small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In addition, within the NSCLC category, squamous cell carcinomas and non-G12C KRAS mutant NSCLC have no specific targetable therapies to date. Therefore, assessment of the PD-L1 expression level among these subtypes of lung cancer is required, since lung cancer is one of the few malignances wherein PD-L1 expression levels is so crucial in determining the role of immunotherapy. In this study, we compared PD-L1 expression in lung cancer according to the histological subtype of the tumor.

Background: Uterine cancer (UC) is one of the leading gynecologic neoplastic disorders in the United States (US), of which over 80% are endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EA). In contrast to EA, carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus is a sporadic and highly malignant tumor, phylogenetically containing both epithelial and mesenchymal histologic elements. This study sought to analyze demographic, pathological retrospectively, and survival characteristics of a large cohort of CS patients compared to EA patients to identify prognostic factors and treatment approaches that may improve the current clinical management of CS patients. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from 88,530 patients diagnosed with uterine malignancy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for 38 years (1973-2010). Extracted variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis, while Kaplan-Meier functions were used to compare survival between groups. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS^©), version 20.2 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results: A total of 3,706 cases of CS comprised 38.2% of uterine sarcomas (n=9,702), and 4.1% of uterine cancers overall (n=88,530). EA made up 88.6% (n=78,481) of all uterine cancers. CS patients presented later in life (68.3±11.5 years) than EA (61.9±12.5 years). 65.2% of CS and 77.8% of EA occurred in Caucasians. The incidence (per million) of EA was higher in Caucasians compared to African-Americans (AA) (41% vs. 26.8%), while the incidence of CS was higher among AA than Caucasians (4% vs. 1.9%, p<0.001). 33.4% of CS was poorly differentiated at presentation, compared to 13.1% of EA. 27.8% of CS patients presented with a distant disease compared to only 4.7% of EA patients. 29.9% of AA patients with CS presented with metastatic disease, compared to 28.2% of Caucasian patients (p<0.001). Mean survival for CS patients (6.6±0.2 years) was significantly lower than that of EA patients (17.7±0.7 years, p<0.001), and AA CS patients had significantly lower survival than Caucasians CS patients (4.5±0.4 years vs. 7.1±0.3 years, p<0.001). CS patients treated with combined surgery and radiotherapy had the highest survival (9.4±0.5 years, p<0.001), while EA patients treated with surgery alone had the highest survival (20.4±1.2 years, p<0.001). Survival among AA CS patients treated with combination therapy was significantly inferior compared to Caucasians (6.5±0.6 years vs. 9.8±0.5 years, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified CS histology (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, CI=1.7-2.1), AA race (OR 1.3, CI=1.2-1.4), age over 40 (OR 3.4, CI=2.9-4.1), undifferentiated grade (OR 3.0, CI=2.6-3.4), and distant metastases (OR 6.2, CI=5.8-6.8) as independently associated with increased mortality (p<0.005). The use of radiotherapy in CS patients was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.1, CI=0.02-0.6, p<0.005). Conclusions: Uterine CS is a highly malignant tumor with a significantly worse prognosis than EA. AA has a considerably higher CS incidence compared to EA. Moreover, AA CS had higher tumor grades, higher rates of metastatic disease, and experienced significantly lower overall survival compared to Caucasians despite receiving similar therapy. Primary radiotherapy or combination radiotherapy confers a survival advantage to AA uterine CS patients.